Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Special Report: Axis Of Allies

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Special Report: Axis Of Allies

    SPECIAL REPORT: AXIS OF ALLIES
    By Christopher Orlet

    The American Spectator
    Oct 26 2006

    Writing last week in the Wall Street Journal Tunku Varadarajan made a
    good case that Pakistan's leader Gen. Pervez Musharraf has been for
    the past five years two-timing the U.S. The general has "played the
    Americans beautifully":

    After five years of Pakistani collaboration with the U.S. military in
    Afghanistan, not one Taliban leader of consequence has been captured
    or killed. Afghanistan's president, Hamid Karzai, cries himself hoarse
    over the Taliban functioning out of Pakistan's western regions and he
    is treated with open ridicule by Gen. Musharraf. There is precious
    little, however, that George W. Bush can do about this: He cannot
    now admit that a man he has called his "ally" for the past five years
    has been double-crossing him nearly every minute of that time.

    Nor can he admit that there is a "vast nuclear smuggling ring emanating
    from Pakistan" (Washington Post), doubtless with Musharraf's tacit
    authorization, with Pakistani weapons finding their way to every
    rogue nation that can scrape together a few bucks.

    Sadly, the case of Pakistan is not unique. Another so-called ally,
    Saudi Arabia, has also been playing the U.S. like one of Antonio
    Stradivari's fiddles. The Saudis have never been big fans of Team
    USA. In fact, 87 percent of Saudis hold an unfavorable opinion of
    the U.S. And their own leaders aren't going to win any popularity
    contests either. The Saudi royal family is nothing if not a web of
    contradictions: an ally of the U.S. in the War on Terror and a main
    target of Osama bin Laden, while at the same time an exporter of
    radical Wahhabism. In fact, the only thing the Saudis export more of
    is oil.

    If any Muslim state should be pro-American, it is fellow NATO member
    Turkey. A secular, nominally democratic nation, Turkey longs to
    modernize and move closer to the West, while paradoxically keeping
    Western society at arm's length. (About three-quarters of Turks favor
    EU integration, while a recent Pew Global Attitudes poll showed that
    only 16 percent of Turks held a favorable view of Christians, just
    one percentage point higher than their dislike of Jews.) Politically,
    Turkey is a shambles, a secular government kept that way by a powerful
    military that was seriously embarrassed recently when novelist Orhan
    Pamuk won the Nobel Prize for Politics...errr, Literature, despite
    the government's recent attempts to have him locked up for "insulting
    the Republic." Not long ago Pamuk had the bad taste to bring up the
    (1915-17) Armenian genocide. The Nobel laureate deserved some kind
    of award, if only because he is hated by both the Islamicists and
    the Turkish military, which means he must be doing something right.

    As Pamuk's novels amply demonstrate, there is in his homeland an
    intense hate of "Europeanized" Turks, a revulsion that is only kept
    from violent outbreak by a thuggish military that routinely uses
    torture and the threat of torture to maintain a semblance of order.

    The Turkish rural majority is rabidly anti-American. A recent poll
    shows that a mere 12 percent of Turks hold a favorable opinion of
    the U.S. As for our allies in the capital Ankara, the Turks not only
    opposed the War in Iraq, their parliament voted to forbid U.S. troops
    from crossing into Iraq from Turkish soil.

    EGYPT IS ANOTHER so-called friend who is an ally in name only. An
    impressive 98 percent of Egyptians surveyed have an "unfavorable
    attitude" toward the U.S., according to a Zogby poll. Perhaps Egyptians
    hate the U.S. so much because their military is the second largest
    recipient of American foreign aid, which tends to be used to prop up a
    double-dealing dictatorship that encourages the spread of anti-American
    propaganda ("vicious and loony lies," according to James Glassman of
    the American Enterprise) which tends to feed Muslim extremism.

    And thanks to Saudi meddling, Asian Muslim nations are experiencing
    an upsurge of anti-Western feeling as Wahhabism replaces the mainly
    peaceful, moderate version of Islam long practiced by Asians.

    Wahhabism takes its most radical form in terrorist factions like
    Islamic Defenders' Front, Darul Islam, Laskar Jihad, and Jemaah
    Islamiah, groups that seem determined to prove to their Arab
    co-religionists that they are indeed true Muslims, and who are
    responsible for the many terror attacks in Bali and the Philippines.

    Jemaah Islamiah, a member of the al Qaeda network, maintains that
    it will not cease its terror campaign until a pan-Islamic state,
    consisting of Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, and the Philippine
    island of Mindanao, is established.

    This is especially troubling considering that Indonesia is the
    world's fourth most populous country with the world's largest
    Muslim population. And nowhere do terrorists get off so easily as
    in Indonesia. Human Right's Watch reports that "Abu Bakar Bashir,
    believed by many to be the spiritual head of the terrorist organization
    Jemaah Islamiyah, was convicted in March 2005 of criminal conspiracy
    behind the 2002 Bali bombings. Due to poor conduct of the prosecution,
    he was acquitted of the more serious charge of planning a terrorist
    attack. He received a sentence of only thirty months, which was
    further shortened to twenty-five-and-a-half months in an August 2005
    Independence Day sentence reduction."

    The standard response is that these allies should be cut a generous
    amount of slack, since they must delicately balance the conflicting
    ideals of their Muslim populations and their Western allies, which
    must be why they tell Bush and Rice one thing and their Muslim masses
    another. This would explain the Musharraf-Bush-Karzai love-in at
    the White House last month, while back home in Islamabad the natives
    were hearing that the U.S. threatened to bomb Pakistan back to the
    Stone Age if Musharraf didn't cooperate in the War on Terror. Such
    two-timing works to the general's advantage, of course. A recent BBC
    poll showed that 88 percent of Pakistanis believe that Musharraf was
    pressured to support the War on Terror.

    Majority Muslim nations and the West are not natural allies. Most
    Muslim countries are undemocratic, or at best illiberal democracies
    where separation of church and state and other basic freedoms are
    wanting, where Sharia law trumps what's known as Roman or British
    law, where religious police or a thuggish military dispense a unique
    brand of primitive justice. More and more Muslims are adopting
    an anti-Christian, anti-American, and anti-modern desert Islam due
    largely to the continuing exportation of Saudi and Egyptian preachers
    of hate. We call these countries our allies, but only because
    our vocabulary lacks a descriptive noun for such an unpleasant,
    but necessary arrangement. Genuine allies share goals, values, an
    interest in outcomes -- they are those nations you can trust to get
    your back. Britain is such an ally, Australia, Canada, Poland too.

    Perhaps some industrious young linguist will come up with an
    appropriate neologism. Ally isn't cutting it.

    Christopher Orlet is a frequent contributor and runs the Existential
    Journalist.

    http://www.spectator.org/ dsp_article.asp?art_id=10540

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X