Tweet
PRO-TURKEY FORCES PRESSING EP TO RETREAT FROM PRINCIPLED STAND ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE
PanARMENIAN.Net
04.09.2006 14:21 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The European Parliament Committee on Foreign Affairs
is scheduled on September 4th to consider a draft report on Turkey
prepared by Dutch MEP Camiel Eurlings (EPP). Over the past two months,
pro-Turkish forces with European institutions have sought to ignore
or marginalize more than 340 amendments, mostly critical of Turkey,
that have been offered to the measure.
The draft prepared by Eurling deals with the Armenian Genocide in a
vaguely worded paragraph that calls upon the Parliament to "takes
note of the proposal by Turkey to establish a bilateral committee
of experts in order to overcome the tragic experience of the past,
and the position of Armenia regarding that proposal" and "urges both
the Turkish government and the Armenian government to continue their
process of reconciliation leading to a mutually acceptable resolution.
" This formulation, which is patterned after the outright denial
position of the Turkish government, represents a retreat from the
Parliament's traditional posture of calling on Turkey to properly
acknowledge this crime against humanity. This proposed dramatic shift
in position prompted a broad range of MEPs to offer amendments to
this measure.
With regard to Turkey's blockade of Armenia, the draft report "urges
Turkey to take the necessary steps, without any preconditions, to
establish diplomatic and good neighbourly relations with Armenia
and to open the land border at an early date, in accordance with the
resolutions adopted by Parliament between 1987 and 2005."
Rather than recognizing that the large number of amendments reflect
broad-based dissatisfaction with the draft's pro-Turkey bias, the
Rapporteur and political party leaders chose to propose their own set
of proposed "compromise" changes. These proposals largely ignore the
vast majority of the amendments.
The managers of this process, in the place of allowing MEPs
to weight the merits of the amendments, have chosen instead to
reduce these concerns to a series of weak and basically ineffectual
measures. Collectively, the "compromise" proposals that have more in
common with Turkish government's position than the standing policy
of the European Parliament.
"The draft and the changes being put forward by the Rapporteur don't
represent a compromise, but rather a profound retreat from the European
Parliament's principled position," declared the Chairperson of the
European Armenian Federation, Hilda Tchoboian.
The European Armenian Federation encourages Members of the Committee on
Foreign Affairs to exercise their right to vote on the duly offered
amendments urging Turkey to recognize the Armenian Genocide as a
precondition for joining the European Union. The Federation also
calls upon MEPs to vote for amendments calling upon the Commission
to include in the Ankara Roadmap framework the necessity that Turkey
recognizes the Armenian Genocide and lifts its blockade of Armenia.
PanARMENIAN.Net
04.09.2006 14:21 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The European Parliament Committee on Foreign Affairs
is scheduled on September 4th to consider a draft report on Turkey
prepared by Dutch MEP Camiel Eurlings (EPP). Over the past two months,
pro-Turkish forces with European institutions have sought to ignore
or marginalize more than 340 amendments, mostly critical of Turkey,
that have been offered to the measure.
The draft prepared by Eurling deals with the Armenian Genocide in a
vaguely worded paragraph that calls upon the Parliament to "takes
note of the proposal by Turkey to establish a bilateral committee
of experts in order to overcome the tragic experience of the past,
and the position of Armenia regarding that proposal" and "urges both
the Turkish government and the Armenian government to continue their
process of reconciliation leading to a mutually acceptable resolution.
" This formulation, which is patterned after the outright denial
position of the Turkish government, represents a retreat from the
Parliament's traditional posture of calling on Turkey to properly
acknowledge this crime against humanity. This proposed dramatic shift
in position prompted a broad range of MEPs to offer amendments to
this measure.
With regard to Turkey's blockade of Armenia, the draft report "urges
Turkey to take the necessary steps, without any preconditions, to
establish diplomatic and good neighbourly relations with Armenia
and to open the land border at an early date, in accordance with the
resolutions adopted by Parliament between 1987 and 2005."
Rather than recognizing that the large number of amendments reflect
broad-based dissatisfaction with the draft's pro-Turkey bias, the
Rapporteur and political party leaders chose to propose their own set
of proposed "compromise" changes. These proposals largely ignore the
vast majority of the amendments.
The managers of this process, in the place of allowing MEPs
to weight the merits of the amendments, have chosen instead to
reduce these concerns to a series of weak and basically ineffectual
measures. Collectively, the "compromise" proposals that have more in
common with Turkish government's position than the standing policy
of the European Parliament.
"The draft and the changes being put forward by the Rapporteur don't
represent a compromise, but rather a profound retreat from the European
Parliament's principled position," declared the Chairperson of the
European Armenian Federation, Hilda Tchoboian.
The European Armenian Federation encourages Members of the Committee on
Foreign Affairs to exercise their right to vote on the duly offered
amendments urging Turkey to recognize the Armenian Genocide as a
precondition for joining the European Union. The Federation also
calls upon MEPs to vote for amendments calling upon the Commission
to include in the Ankara Roadmap framework the necessity that Turkey
recognizes the Armenian Genocide and lifts its blockade of Armenia.