Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Amid intense debate, Senate Foreign Relations Committee approves Hoa

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Amid intense debate, Senate Foreign Relations Committee approves Hoa

    Amid intense debate, Senate Foreign Relations Committee approves Hoagland
    nomination

    ArmRadio.am
    08.09.2006 10:17

    The Senate Foreign Relations Committee, by a vote of 13 to 5,
    approved Ambassador-Designate Hoagland's nomination. For over forty
    minutes, Senators spoke forcefully on the nomination, each affirming
    the historical facts of the Armenian Genocide. Those opposed to
    the nomination urged their colleagues to take a stand against the
    Administration's complicity in genocide denial. Senator Barbara Boxer
    (D-CA), in her remarks, noted that "The only way to express our deep
    disappointment that he [Ambassador Evans] was recalled, it seems to
    me, is to vote 'no'." Answering concerns about the absence of an
    US Ambassador to Armenia during an extended confirmation process,
    Sen. Boxer argued, "I agree that it is important that we have an
    Ambassador there. But isn't it easy for the Administration to simply
    say 'we will speak the truth'? And then, we will have our Ambassador."

    In his remarks, Senator Paul Sarbanes (D-MD) expressed concerns about
    the nominee's ability to accurately and effectively communicate the
    Administration's position on the Armenian Genocide. Noting that, in
    correspondence with Ranking Democrat Joseph Biden (D-DE), Amb. Hoagland
    had needed to make changes to his initial written responses to a
    series of Senate inquiries; Sen. Sarbanes noted that, "Ambassadors
    deal with language. It is very important. You pick the wrong word,
    you create a lot of problems. They have revised other answers. And so,
    I looked through the revisions, and approve of them, but it raises
    a question in my mind: 'where was the understanding and sensitivity
    on the part of this nominee on responding to the questions that had
    been submitted to him in the first place. What does it say that we
    got those answers in the first place?"

    Senator John Kerry (D-MA), voted against the nomination as a matter of
    principle. "For us to recall an ambassador because he utters the word
    'genocide', is to cow-tow, to cave-in to those who change history,
    something we are witnessing today with [President] Ahmadinajad in
    Iran who says the Holocaust didn't exist. So it is even more important
    that we say something to the contrary.

    We are not going to allow revisionism. We are not going to allow
    people to push the United States of America around and say what you
    can and can't say about what's happening with respect to history. We
    honor history and we honor the truth. I don't think we do so if we
    allow this Administration to take the contrary policy."

    On two previous occasions, June 28th and again on August 1st,
    the panel had delayed its consideration of Ambassador-Designate
    Hoagland's nomination.

    These delays were prompted by bipartisan concerns over a series of
    controversies over the nomination. Among these points of contention
    were is the nominee's written response to Senator Boxer's inquiry,
    in which he questioned the genocidal intent of the Ottoman Turkish
    government. Also of concern to members of the panel is the State
    Department's firing of the current US Ambassador to Armenia, John
    Marshal Evans. His early recall from Yerevan is widely seen as
    retribution for his public statements, in February of 2005, calling
    for an end to "word games" by the US government in avoiding the proper
    recognition of the Armenian Genocide. Despite dozens of Congressional
    inquiries, the Administration has yet explain its reasons for firing
    Amb. Evans or to reveal the communications it received from the
    Turkish government on this matter.
Working...
X