Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Human Rights Watch" Has Sent a Letter to the Court of Cassation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • "Human Rights Watch" Has Sent a Letter to the Court of Cassation

    A1+

    "HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH" HAS SENT A LETTER TO THE COURT OF CASSATION
    [01:46 pm] 15 September, 2006

    The International Organization `Human Rights Watch' which struggles
    for the protection of humanm rights is more than 70 countries has sent
    a letter to Armenia, in particular to the President of the RA Court of
    Cassation, Hovhannes Manoukyan.

    Your Honor,

    Please accept my greetings on behalf of Human Rights Watch. As you may
    know, Human Rights Watch is an independent, international human rights
    organization that advocates respect for human rights in some seventy
    countries worldwide, including Armenia.

    We are writing to express our deep concern regarding allegations of
    torture and inhuman and degrading treatment relating to the case of
    Razmik Sargsian, Musa Serobian and Arayik Zalian, convicted of
    murdering two of their fellow conscript soldiers. The Court of
    Cassation received a request to hear an appeal in this case on
    September 11, 2006.

    On May 13, 2005, the Syunik Marz Court of first instance sentenced
    Razmik Sargsian, Musa Serobian and Arayik Zalian to fifteen years of
    imprisonment. On May 30, 2006, the Court of Appeals changed the
    sentence to life imprisonment.

    During a recent mission to Armenia, Human Rights Watch collected
    information about the case. Taking no position on the defendants'
    innocence or guilt, we are profoundly concerned that the verdicts of
    both courts were largely based on the confession of one of the
    defendants, Razmik Sargsian. There are reasonable grounds to believe
    that his confession was made following subjection to torture and other
    cruel treatment. Sargsian stated first to his lawyer and then later in
    court that after he had been initially questioned as a witness in the
    case on April 19, 2004, he was subjected to several days of brutal
    beatings and psychological pressure by the military procuracy
    investigators, as a result of which he confessed to the crime and
    incriminated Serobian and Zalian as his accomplices. Sargsian states
    that the investigators handcuffed his hands behind his back, suspended
    him from his hands and beat him in this position. They also threatened
    him with rape. In a video tape of the confession, Sargsian's face was
    swollen and bruised, strongly suggesting that he had suffered
    ill-treatment prior to making the confession.

    Later, during the pretrial investigation and at the trial Sargsian
    stated his innocence saying that he had been forced under physical and
    psychological pressure into making the confession. The other
    defendants, Serobian and Zalian, also told the court they had been
    tortured during interrogations by investigating officers, and they
    never pleaded guilty. The Syunik Marz court, however, did not
    investigate the allegations of ill-treatment and denied the defense's
    motions that were introduced to substantiate the torture
    complaints. For instance, the court refused to grant the defense's
    motion to do an examination of the wooden floor in the investigation
    room in which the men were questioned. According to the defense, the
    floor has blood stains as result of the torture of Sargsian, Serobian
    and Zalian. The court also refused to examine medical documents from
    the hospital where Sargsian was taken during his hunger strike which
    indicate a variety of medical problems, some of which appear to be the
    result of beatings.

    In addition, in its verdict the court did not address numerous
    contradictions in the prosecution's case, including those related to
    the date, hour, place, and method of the killing.

    The defendants' lawyer has submitted an application to the European
    Court of Human Rights alleging numerous violations of the European
    Convention on Human Rights with respect to the defendants.

    International treaties to which Armenia is a party, including the
    European Convention on Human Rights, the International Covenant on
    Civil and Political Rights, and the United Nations Convention against
    Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
    prohibit the use of torture. These treaties also emphasize that
    statements made under torture cannot be invoked as evidence, except
    against a person accused of torture. International law also obliges
    states to guarantee defendants' right to a fair trial and to ensure
    that any criminal proceedings areconducted in accordance with
    fundamental due process requirements. The failure to uphold these
    standards would constitute serious breaches of Armenia's international
    obligations.

    Your honor, we hope that the Court of Cassation, will be fully mindful
    as it reviews the case that it does so in accordance with Armenia's
    binding human rights obligations.

    Human Rights Watch believes that it is very important that given the
    credible allegations of torture in this case, and Armenia's
    obligations to do so, that a prompt investigation into the allegations
    is ordered, and that all measures are put in place to ensure that any
    conviction based on evidence coerced under torture does not stand.

    Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter,

    Sincerely,

    Holly Cartner

    Executive Director

    Europe and Central Asia Division
Working...
X