Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Genocide case still stuck in court

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Genocide case still stuck in court

    Genocide case still stuck in court
    By Jillian Fennimore/ Staff Writer

    Community News Company
    Friday, September 22, 2006

    Oral arguments were heard for the first time on the motion to dismiss
    the case of the Assembly of Turkish American Associations and its
    lawsuit against the Massachusetts's Department of Education's
    curriculum guide concerning the teaching of the Armenian genocide.

    U.S. District Court Judge Mark L. Wolf presided over the
    courtroom on Monday, and has yet to make a ruling regarding
    procedural issues and merits within the case.

    As a result of last year's lawsuit, involving a Lincoln-Sudbury
    High School history teacher and high school senior, along with
    another teacher and ATAA, the Armenian Assembly of America filed an
    amicus curiae - friend of the court - brief in support of defending
    the rights to teach the genocide history in the schools.

    According to a press release, the ATAA lawsuit asserts that a
    decision to remove materials of genocide denial in the school
    curriculum amounts to "censoring" and therefore would be a violation
    of the First Amendment.

    The Lincoln-Sudbury High School teacher, Bill Schecter, and
    senior Ted Griswold argue that the Turkish perspective in the
    teaching of 1915 slayings of approximately 1.5 million Armenians
    during their deportation from Turkey were deleted from curriculum
    guidelines.

    Their perspective is that the Armenian Genocide never occurred,
    even though genocidal historians fully acknowledge that it did occur.

    Harvey Silvergate, an attorney representing the ATAA, said he is
    hopeful of the outcome because the judge was very precise in hearing
    all the facts.

    "It's unusual to have a judge hear a motion like this for so
    long," he said about the 2 1/2-hour session. "He has a very serious
    consideration for this."

    Silvergate estimates that a ruling will be made within weeks.

    But voices from the other side say the lawsuit is an act of
    rewriting history and is just wrong.

    "The state's curriculum ensures that the lessons of the
    Holocaust, Armenian Genocide, Irish Famine and other crimes against
    humanity are not forgotten and thus taught in classrooms," said Scott
    Ferson, spokesman for the Armenian Assembly of America.

    Arnold Rosenfeld, an attorney representing the Armenian Assembly
    of America, said there are three basic procedural issues the judge
    could rule on, regarding whether or not the lawsuit meets the statute
    of limitations, is qualified as discrimination, or has standing,
    "They really did not show that they had been harmed," Rosenfeld
    said about the plaintiff's case.

    Anthony Barsamian, Armenian Assembly Board of Directors chairman,
    labeled the lawsuit as "disingenuous" and without clout, only moving
    forward to create controversy.

    "We will just keep muddying this thing up," he said. "I just
    think that is unfortunate."

    He said he has been pleased by the response of community members
    and the interest in joining the coalition to seek a positive outcome.

    Depending on the judge's ruling, the case could be dismissed,
    appealed or continued into a discovery hearing.

    Jillian Fennimore can be reached at [email protected].
Working...
X