Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Two Allegiances, One Truth

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Two Allegiances, One Truth

    TWO ALLEGIANCES, ONE TRUTH
    By Lisa Haidostian

    Michigan Daily
    http://media.www.michigandaily.com/media/sto rage/paper851/news/2008/04/09/TheStatement/Two-All egiances.One.Truth-3312034.shtml
    April 9 2008
    MI

    PrintEmail Article Tools Page 1 of 1 In ninth grade, my world studies
    teacher was delivering a requisite "We are the melting pot of the
    world" lecture when he said something that jarred me away from my
    old-school Nokia cell phone game.

    "I mean, if there was a war, most immigrants in this country would
    fight for America's army," he said, or something along those lines.

    Not so fast, I thought. It can't be that clear-cut.

    As a third-generation Armenian, and ever since I spent my first summer
    transitioning abruptly from country club tennis matches to singing
    the Armenian anthem at culture camp, I've been playing some sort of
    identity hopscotch game, never quite knowing on exactly which square
    to land.

    It's no surprise that there's a blurring of national loyalties for
    someone who grew up, as I did, with steadfast ties to an ancestral
    homeland, but who also waves the American flag, as I do, as high as
    the rest on the Fourth of July.

    But for many Armenians, there's an especially strong devotion to our
    ethnicity because of an unrecognized, unaddressed and often unknown
    genocide that's been stinging our people for more than 92 years.

    While the passing of almost a century might seem to dim the catastrophe
    for most, it only sharpens it for Armenians of my generation. The
    survivors and witnesses to the systematic killings are all but
    gone, and most countries still won't go on the record to call it a
    genocide. Many young Armenians feel it now falls to them to make sure
    the atrocities aren't blotted out of history forever.

    By now, I hope you've heard. Between the years of 1915 and 1918,
    the Ottoman Turks killed an estimated 1.5 million Armenians. Many
    were either brutally murdered or died of starvation or exhaustion
    while on forced marches to concentration camps in the Syrian Desert
    that most never reached.

    It concerns me that most students won't read about the genocide in
    textbooks. Despite the scholarly consensus, overwhelming evidence and
    first-hand accounts of the atrocities, Turkey's government claims
    the mass killings were "ethnic conflicts" due to World War I. Only
    22 countries to date have officially recognized the Armenian genocide.

    It's impossible for me not to relate the "Save Darfur" e-mails dotting
    my inbox to my own country, which, almost a hundred years later,
    still needs some saving of its own.

    While President Bush has officially acknowledged the killings in
    Darfur as genocide, the United States has yet to condemn the Armenian
    killings as such.

    In October, the U.S. got sort of close when the House of
    Representatives nearly brought to a vote a resolution condemning the
    Ottoman Turks' actions against Armenians as genocide.

    But for me, the resolution represented both a step toward the
    fulfillment of a longtime hope and a personal identity crisis.

    Immediately after the U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs passed
    the resolution, there was backlash from President Bush, prominent
    politicians and others who insisted that, while what happened was
    regrettable, relations with Turkey were too crucial to be harmed. And
    relations with Turkey were what mattered.

    This isn't the right time, they insisted. Not when Turkey is an ally
    in an ongoing war, they decreed.

    At the risk of making the Armenian community's collective jaw drop,
    I found myself a bit conflicted while sifting through the many news
    articles and columns on the issue. I'd been grappling with the genocide
    since I was five years old, ever since my Sunday school teacher
    explained it as I crafted a cross out of dry macaroni noodles. I'd
    written the letters to my congressmen. I'd held my candle during the
    vigils on the Diag.

    But I'm an American, too, I thought. As government official after
    government official warned of violence and a ricochet of consequences
    felt round the world, I wondered whether it would be best if we waited
    just a few more years. Maybe this isn't the right time. What if the
    resolution was adopted and the next day, Turkish syndicates launched
    an attack on the U.S.? I felt un-Armenian and un-American at the same
    time, and suddenly I wasn't even on the hopscotch board at all.

    But soon I understood that I was in such a state of flux because I
    wasn't looking at the situation properly. I realized that it does more
    harm than good for the U.S. to continue denying that the massacres
    were genocide and to condoning the millions of dollars the Turkish
    government spends trying to convince people it never happened. Sitting
    center stage in the global arena, the U.S. can send a message to the
    world that there are actual consequences for committing genocide. It
    doesn't matter that ours was in the past.

    Genocide is still happening today.

    I also realized that it's OK to have two homes and sport both an
    American flag and an Armenian key chain. There's no need to pick
    between countries, and if there was, I'd fight for whichever needed
    me most.

    -Lisa Haidostian is an associate news editor for The Michigan Daily
Working...
X