Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Way Towards Preventing Genocide

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Way Towards Preventing Genocide

    THE WAY TOWARDS PREVENTING GENOCIDE
    Naira Khachatryan

    Hayots Ashkhar Daily
    Published on April 23, 2008
    Armenia

    "There was a group of people among the Armenians for whom April 24
    also became a day of struggle. They made political appeals under the
    Soviet rule.

    These were the people who chanted 'our lands', a slogan behind
    which lay the idea of eliminating the consequences of Genocide,"
    PARUYR HAYRIKYAN, Head of the National Self-Determination Union,
    said yesterday in "Urbat" club, recalling the events of April 24, 1965.

    According the leader of the National Self-Determination Union,
    April 24 is also a day of learning lessons from history. "We tried to
    understand what were the historical regularities that led to Genocide
    and how it was possible to prevent them. My colleague Movses Gorgisyan,
    a national hero, used to say that the shortest way towards recognizing
    Genocide is restoring the statehood."

    The recognition of the Armenian Genocide and the elimination of its
    consequences is a strategic issue, and it is necessary to reveal its
    political and legal background. "We have a potential; we have serious
    legal and political opportunities in the form of an international
    document, and all this should be summed up."

    Among those strategic issues, P. Hayrikyan singled out the questions
    concerning the Armenian-Turkish relations. In particular, he offered
    to reject the agreement signed on March 16, 1921. "The Turks are
    well-aware that the agreement is illegal. They are also aware that
    the issue will be raised sooner or later."

    He is convinced that other politicians, political scientists and
    scholars will advance a proposal on the elimination of the consequences
    of Genocide, but the issue may be resolved only through a coordinated
    state approach.

    "In my opinion, from the first day of establishing our statehood, it
    was necessary to set up a committee elaborating packages applicable
    to different situations and specifying the strategic trends."

    The times when the publication of a book written by a historian or an
    opinion expressed by the latter could arouse happiness are in the past.

    "The state has to sum up and bring to life the interests which are
    to its benefit."

    According to the leader of the National Self-Determination
    Union, no matter how much we may try to build the Armenia-Turkish
    relations without any preconditions, they have fallen to our lot by
    destiny, and the 1921 treaty is one of those preconditions. "After
    declaring it null and void, there emerges the problem of Kars,
    Ardahan and Nakhijevan. These are not only political-moral but
    also legal opportunities. Two states signed a treaty concerning a
    third state. From the point of view of international law, this is
    unacceptable, and I believe the relations with Turkey should be
    started at this point."

    P. Hayrikyan insisted that it is impossible to build relations with a
    state which denies the fact of genocide, a fact that was recognized
    by around 20 countries of the world. "Turkey is the successor of a
    criminal state that committed murders and now it tries to deny the
    fact of Genocide by its policy, whereas the world recognizes it. The
    European Union recognized the fact back in 1987."

    By the way, this period of time is favorable in terms of introducing
    a turning point in the Armenian-Turkish relations since our
    country's president is supported by the overwhelming majority of the
    parliamentary factions. "The President should feel that 80 percent of
    the entire political arena supports him and he can really undertake
    serious steps."

    The leader of the National Self-Determination Union also submitted his
    proposals to the political coalition. Perhaps, they seem unfeasible
    at present, but he always has the hope of bringing them to life. "The
    Supreme Council used to condemn us for desiring to have a 'national
    army' and refusing to admit the absurd principle that said, 'our
    protection consists in our being unprotected'. When we spoke about
    the constitution, they would say we didn't need any constitution at
    all. And today, these are usual, regular achievements. Ideas should
    be put into circulation, developed and represented."
Working...
X