Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BAKU: Azerbaijani territorial integrity vital in Karabakh settlement

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BAKU: Azerbaijani territorial integrity vital in Karabakh settlement

    ITAR-TASS
    Azerbaijani territorial integrity vital in Karabakh settlement
    05.08.2008

    BAKU, August 5 (Itar-Tass) -- The Karabakh conflict must be resolved within
    the territorially integral Azerbaijan, President Ilham Aliyev said at the
    Tuesday meeting of the national government.
    `The main essence of the settlement negotiations is the restoration of the
    territorial integrity of Azerbaijan. We do not discuss any options outside
    this framework,' he said.
    It is possible to discuss the future status of Karabakh, the president said.
    `However, no status is possible without consent of the Azerbaijani state.
    Azerbaijan will never grant Karabakh with any status outside its territorial
    integrity. This is known by Armenia and the OSCE Minsk Group Cochairmen
    [Russia, the United States and France],' he said.
    There is no document at the negotiations, which could make Karabakh
    independent, Aliyev said. `There is no mechanism of Karabakh's secession
    from Azerbaijan, and there cannot be any,' he said.
    The problem can have only a legal solution, the president said. `Azerbaijan
    will not waive its rights an inch. It will mobilize all the resources and
    work on the soonest settlement with due account of all international norms,'
    he said.
    Aliyev said they should intensify diplomatic, political, economic,
    propaganda and military efforts in order to resolve the Karabakh problem as
    soon as possible.
    The Azerbaijani and Armenian foreign ministers held consultations with the
    OSCE Minsk Group cochairmen in Moscow on Friday, August 1.
    It is still a long way to the Karabakh settlement, Azerbaijani Foreign
    Minister Elmar Mamedyarov said after the consultations.
    `We attentively listened to the Armenian side. It is still a long way to a
    breakthrough, but we have agreed to continue negotiations,' he said.
    `The negotiations were useful. We discussed remaining problems,' the
    minister noted.
    Mamedyarov said that the Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents might hold
    another meeting. `Everything depends on consultations between the two
    foreign ministers,' he said. `If we find a common ground, nothing will be
    impossible.'
    Armenian Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandian did not go into the meeting's
    details. `If we tell details to the media, it will be hard to make further
    progress,' he said. `There are delicate issues, and we must be careful in
    order not to create additional impediments. The Moscow meeting confirmed
    that the sides were trying to create proper conditions for further
    negotiations.'
    The sides agreed that the problem must be resolved gradually, Mamedyarov
    said. `We are neighbors, and we must resolve Karabakh problems,' Nalbandian
    said. `I am sure we can resolve any problems with political will. The spirit
    of the negotiations is positive and constructive.'
    The OSCE Minsk Group cochairmen lauded the Moscow meeting of the Armenian
    and Azerbaijani foreign ministers.
    `The meeting was very constructive. Both ministers were satisfied,' Russian
    Cochairman Yuri Merzlyakov said. He abstained from forecasts about the
    possible Karabakh settlement deadline, but lauded the activity of the OSCE
    Minsk Group. `That was the third meeting of the ministers in the past three
    months,' he said.
    U.S. Cochairman Matthew Bryza said that it was possible to resolve the
    Karabakh problem in case of a political will of both sides. He said their
    mission was to build up confidence and to promote the negotiations.
    Bryza said that the Karabakh situation was still difficult but some progress
    had been made. He recalled the Madrid proposals of the OSCE Minsk Group,
    which started current consultations. Bryza also said that the possible
    Karabakh sovereignty would be a question of referendum.
Working...
X