Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mixed Reaction In Azeri Breakaway Region's Media To US Official's Re

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mixed Reaction In Azeri Breakaway Region's Media To US Official's Re

    MIXED REACTION IN AZERI BREAKAWAY REGION'S MEDIA TO US OFFICIAL'S REMARKS

    Kavkazskiy Uzel website
    Aug. 5 2008
    Russia

    The Karabakh media are discussing a statement by the American
    co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group, Matthew Bryza, that the people
    of Nagornyy Karabakh should themselves decide whether they should be
    a part of Azerbaijan or to live independently.

    The statement caused "raptures of delight" in Armenian political
    circles and the pro-government media, writes the Karabakh correspondent
    of the Armenian Lragir.am news agency website. In the opinion of a
    representative of the bureau of the American Revolutionary Federation
    - Dashnaktsutyun, Kiro Manoyan, Bryza said nothing new, and what's
    more, according to him, there is nothing positive for us in what he
    had to say".

    Kiro Manoyan stresses that the co-chairmen, when speaking
    about Karabakh, think about the former NKAO [Nagornyy Karabakh
    Autonomous Region], which is definitely not in the interests of the
    Armenians. Within the framework of the former NKAO Nagornyy Karabakh
    cannot implement its right to self-determination.

    "In politics at large no-one goes by state borders. In politics at
    large the world is divided into military-strategic and fuel-energy
    entities. Each entity is a self-sufficient system with its own
    communications, defence system, natural resources and the capability
    of influencing other entities. Borders divide this entity into
    several weak-willed states, each of which is of no use to anything
    in isolation. In this context Karabakh, within the confines of the
    NKAO, is not an entity, it is merely a part of it, like a disabled
    person without arms and legs. In the big political map Karabakh may
    be considered only in its current actual borders. They have, after
    all, developed by accident. Somebody once drew a line on which the
    fighting in 1994 was supposed to be stopped," the agency site writes.

    In the paper's opinion, to divide Nagornyy Karabakh into the NKAO
    and "liberated" or "occupied territories" means pulling apart a
    self-sufficient military-political entity. "And one has to think in
    whose interests this is being done. And one cannot be pleased by the
    statements of the cheerful American who, unlike our politicians, often
    looks at the map and does not want to see a strong military-strategic
    entity in the region." the paper notes.

    The Aparazh newspaper, which is the organ of the Karabakh structure
    of the ARF Dashnaktsutyun, writes in its editor's column, that in the
    foreign policy of the Armenian states there should be a "red line",
    which should not be crossed. This "red line" in the Karabakh question
    is the security of the people of the NKR and the preservation of
    statehood within the present borders. The paper urges the Karabakh
    Foreign Ministry to carry out more active publicity in the outside
    world to present the position of the NKR.

    It will be recalled that on 1 August in Moscow, at the initiative of
    the OSCE, a meeting was held of the foreign ministers of Armenia and
    Azerbaijan, Edvard Nalbandyan and Elmar Mammadyarov.

    At the end of the meeting US Assistant Deputy State Secretary Matthew
    Bryza said that Karabakh would either achieve independence or transfer
    to the jurisdiction of Azerbaijan. "A referendum will be held and
    the Karabakhis themselves will decide," Bryza noted on the decision
    regarding the status of the unrecognized republic.
Working...
X