Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Georgian leader chose his moment

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Georgian leader chose his moment

    The Post, Ireland
    Aug 10 2008


    Georgian leader chose his moment


    10 August 2008

    Seamus Martin examines the background to the conflict between Russia
    and Georgia.

    The volatile Caucasus region is strategically important as a transit
    route for oil from the east. Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili
    is, without question, the region's most volatile leader.

    His decision to shell the South Ossetian city of Tshkinvali while most
    world leaders were in Beijing for the opening of the Olympic Games has
    threatened to cause the biggest crisis in Europe for almost two
    decades. His action appears to have been a calculated gamble at a time
    when world attention is focused elsewhere.

    Saakashvili, who is ostensibly pro-western, gambled correctly that
    Russia would respond in such away that it would leave itself open to
    allegations of expansionism and invasion. In fact, Russia's new
    president, Dmitry Medvedev, had little option but to send in the
    tanks. The bombing of the Georgian town of Gori, Stalin's birthplace,
    is less excusable.

    Saakashvili has also gambled that the west will come to his aid
    militarily in any conflict with Russia. He is likely to lose that
    second bet. Concerted peace efforts by Europe, the US and the
    international community, in general, appear to be the only hope of
    avoiding catastrophic warfare in the area and the main catastrophe
    could be on the Georgian side.

    These efforts will, on the one hand, need to take the form of strong
    pressure on Saakashvili, since he is the party in this conflict most
    likely to be open to western influence. On the other hand, calm
    requests to Russia to accept a negotiated ceasefire will need to be
    made.

    Saakashvili's continuous and consistent tweaking of the Bear's tail
    has finally brought a serious response with Russian tanks rolling into
    South Ossetia. In a technical sense, Russia can be seen as invading
    Georgian territory, but South Ossetia has been independent of Georgia
    on a de facto basis since the early 1990s.

    Another and perhaps more serious situation could now arise in
    Abkhazia, a second area that broke away from Georgia in 1993.

    Known throughout Georgia simply as `Misha', Saakashvili came to power
    in the name of democracy during the Rose Revolution of 2003 that
    ousted former Soviet foreign minister Eduard Shevardnadze from the
    Georgian presidency.

    His democratic credentials were damaged by ill-treatment of opposition
    supporters, and media censorship then began to erode his support in
    the west. His continuous and sometimes baseless allegations of Russian
    aggression have not helped relations with Moscow, which has
    traditionally been a major trading partner.

    Georgia inherited two major ethnic problems from the dissolution of
    the Soviet Union. To the north of the capital, Tbilisi, lay South
    Ossetia an enclave of ethnic Ossetes, a group historically supportive
    of Russia.

    They wanted unity with their compatriots in the Russian area of North
    Ossetia, the people whose children were later tome massacred by
    Chechens in the school at Beslan.

    To the west was the incredibly beautiful region of Abkhazia, where the
    Caucasus Mountains reached the coast of the Black Sea. Early in the
    Soviet era Abkhazia had become a Constituent Republic, a status that
    would have automatically given it independence on the dissolution of
    the USSR. But the area was later granted to Georgia by Stalin who was
    a Georgian.

    A fierce war raged in Abkhazia in 1993, during which the region's
    ethnic Georgians were driven off their land. Ethnic Greeks and
    Armenians also fled the area leaving the Abkhaz people almost on their
    own.

    Although technically part of Georgia, the two regions, with Russian
    help, gained de facto independence. The original ethnic reasons for
    separatism added to by the near collapse of Georgia's economy. As the
    years passed, they settled into what has become known in international
    affairs as `frozen conflicts'.

    The shelling of Tskhinvali has ensured that the conflict in South
    Ossetia is no longer frozen. While many former Soviet states, notably
    Russia itself, improved their economies and the living standards of
    their various peoples, Georgia descended into a tumult of clan and
    inter-ethnic hostilities upon the dissolution of the USSR.

    These conflicts, allied to serious corruption, militated against
    economic development. Infrastructure crumbled, unemployment soared,
    and energy sources dried up and the political jokes so prominent in
    the Soviet era began to resurface.

    One told of a typical Georgian apartment in which the macho husband
    sat on the balcony drinking wine while his wife prepared to burn the
    furniture in a stove in order to cook dinner. Suddenly there was a
    flicker and the electric light came on. Then a hiss and the gas
    returned. The wife ran to the balcony shouting: ``I have very bad
    news. I think the communists are back.'

    Under Shevardnadze's rule there was little progress towards settlement
    of the two separatist issues and on the economic front he failed to
    improve matters. Saakashvili and his supporters took to the streets
    successfully to force Shevardnadze from power.

    The Rose Revolution and its supporters were, paradoxically, allowed
    virtually free rein on the streets of the country's ancient and
    beautiful capital, Tbilisi. They triumphed in the name of democracy,
    and Saakashvili was elected president by an overwhelming majority of
    the voters.

    When, four years later, those opposed to Saakashvili's presidency took
    to the same streets they were met with a brutal response from special
    police forces armed not only with conventional weaponry but also with
    modern sonic devices designed to disorient them.

    Opposition protests continued and Saakashvili called an early
    presidential election in January of this year at which he was
    re-elected with a massively reduced majority.

    Europe's main election watchdog, the Office for Democratic
    Institutions and Human Rights, a section of the Organisation for
    Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), while noting that the vote
    was the first genuinely contested election since Georgian
    independence, also verified allegations of intimidation on public
    sector employees and opposition activists.

    Its report also noted that ``the distinction between state
    activities'' and the campaign of Saakashvili was ``blurred'',
    shorthand for the use of the state's resources by Saakashvili in his
    election campaign.

    These election tactics and the earlier brutal treatment of opposition
    protesters by the US-educated Saakashvili caused some western
    governments to question the almost unqualified support they had given
    the Georgian president. His major aim - to succeed in gaining
    membership of Nato for Georgia - was believed to have been badly
    damaged in the process.

    Even his blatant sycophancy in naming the main road from Tbilisi
    Airport to the city centre as George W Bush Avenue had begun to wear
    thin in Washington political circles. He may not be able to count any
    support greater than strongly worded statements, such as that issued
    by US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice, who called on Russia to
    respect Georgia's territorial integrity.

    Seamus Martin is a retired international editor and Moscow
    correspondent of the Irish Times. His memoir, Good Times and Bad, was
    published earlier this year

    http://www.sbpost.ie/post/pages/p/story.aspx -qqqt=WORLD-qqqs=news-qqqid=35039-qqqx=1.asp
Working...
X