Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Georgian-Russian Conflict Through The Eyes Of Baku

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Georgian-Russian Conflict Through The Eyes Of Baku

    THE GEORGIAN-RUSSIAN CONFLICT THROUGH THE EYES OF BAKU
    By Fariz Ismailzade

    Eurasia Daily Monitor
    Tuesday, August 12, 2008
    DC

    The escalating conflict in Georgia--with its unexpected military
    developments and great humanitarian losses--seems to have caught
    Azerbaijani officials and the public off guard. Azerbaijanis are not
    new to the world of Russian political games in the Caucasus. Baku
    itself suffered greatly from Russian intervention in 1990 and after
    that from the military conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh. Yet, the rapid
    and aggressive style of Russian intervention in Georgia in the past
    few days has created far greater security and economic dilemmas for
    Azerbaijan than even the most pessimistic analysts in the country
    could have predicted only a week ago.

    Russian jet fighters have bombed both civilians and military airports
    in Georgia, forcing all airlines, including Azerbaijani Airlines
    (AZAL), to stop flights. Moreover, for several days in a row the
    Russians bombed the Black Sea port of Poti, which serves as the main
    terminal for the export of Azerbaijani energy products as well as
    other cargo. With the explosions on the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline
    last week, Azerbaijan was looking for Georgian railways, ports and
    pipelines as an important alternative for the export of Caspian energy
    supplies to Western markets. All of this has stopped, putting both
    Georgia and Azerbaijan in economic difficulties. Nonetheless, there
    is little fear in official circles in Baku that Russia will bomb the
    Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline and other energy-related infrastructures
    to destroy the successful East-West transport and energy corridor
    between Azerbaijan and Georgia.

    Azerbaijan is Georgia's strategic ally. Both countries are united
    not only by geopolitical interests and world-class pipelines, but
    also by the regional security organization GUAM. GUAM, although
    passive for most of the decade, has lately been re-energized and
    even played with the idea of establishing its own peacekeeping and
    security forces. Under such a situation, it seems like GUAM would be a
    convenient venue to express support and solidarity with the Georgians.

    Azerbaijan, however, finds itself in a very difficult situation. On
    the one hand, there is enormous public support for Georgia
    throughout Azerbaijan. In private conversations, almost all
    Azerbaijanis blame Russia for aggression and express frustration
    with the imperialist policies of the Kremlin in the South
    Caucasus. A group of intelligentsia went to the Russian embassy
    on August 10 to protest against the military actions in Georgia
    (http://ilgarmammadov.livejournal.com). This was repeated by members
    of youth organizations (www.day.az, August 11). The main opposition
    party Musavat issued a statement on August 11, calling for "respect
    of the territorial integrity of Georgia and an immediate stop to the
    aggressive policy of Russia" (Musavat party press release). The party
    called on the Azerbaijani government to show a "principled position"
    on the conflict. A similar statement came from the Democratic Party
    of Azerbaijan.

    For its pro-Georgian coverage of the events, the most popular
    Azerbaijani news website www.day.az was attacked by Russian special
    forces on August 11 and had to cease its activities temporarily
    (www.day.az press release, August 11). Elnur Baimov, the editor in
    chief of www.day.az said on August 11 that "we all saw the diplomatic
    loss of Russia."

    Government officials have been relatively calm about the situation,
    considering the fragile relations between Moscow and Baku and the
    desire of the latter not to ruin bilateral relations between the two
    countries. The spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Khazar
    Ibrahim told journalists on August 8, however, that "Azerbaijan favors
    the solution of the South Ossetia conflict based on the territorial
    integrity of Georgia and Georgian adherence to international law"
    (www.day.az).

    On August 11, ANS TV reported that 50 Azerbaijanis had gathered in
    Georgia's Azerbaijani-populated provinces to go to the war for the
    defense of their country. It is noteworthy that Russians have bombed
    Azerbaijani populated areas of Georgia for three days in a row, killing
    four and wounding dozens. The possibility is not excluded that this
    was done in hopes of fomenting strife between Azeris and Georgians.

    The present situation in Georgia presents huge security concerns for
    official Baku. If Russia manages to squeeze Georgia, then it would
    put an end to the economic independence of Azerbaijan as well. Many
    analysts in Baku believe that the real purpose of the pressure on
    Georgia is the Kremlin's desire to control Azerbaijan.

    Thus, it is vital for Azerbaijan to provide all necessary assistance
    to its strategic ally. Considering the political realities between
    Baku and Moscow, it is unlikely that the Azerbaijani government will
    provide any military assistance to Georgia. Economic and humanitarian
    assistance, however, is definitely an option. Azerbaijan remains the
    only viable international outlet for Georgia, and many Georgians have
    already started using the territory of Azerbaijan to travel abroad.

    Azerbaijani political analysts believe that the war in Georgia is a
    long-term loss for the Kremlin. By showing its neo-imperialist face,
    Russia may have lost the Caucasus forever. The political analyst
    Ilgar Mammadov says that "If Georgia stays strong for few more days,
    we will all see the defeat of Russia from the Caucasus." Another
    analyst Vugar Seidov says "The departure of Russia from Abkhazia and
    South Ossetia is historically inevitable" (Regnum, August 10).
Working...
X