Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Russia May Turn Focus To Pro-U.S. Ukraine After Beating Georgia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Russia May Turn Focus To Pro-U.S. Ukraine After Beating Georgia

    RUSSIA MAY TURN FOCUS TO PRO-U.S. UKRAINE AFTER BEATING GEORGIA
    By Henry Meyer

    Bloomberg
    Aug 13, 2008

    Aug. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Now that Russia has humiliated Georgia with a
    punishing military offensive, it may shift its attention to reining in
    pro-Western Ukraine, another American ally in the former Soviet Union.

    Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's
    first order of business likely will be to try to thwart Ukraine's
    bid to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

    "The Moscow authorities will use this opportunity to remind Ukraine
    of the damages of allying itself with NATO," said Geoffrey Smith at
    Renaissance Capital investment bank in Kiev.

    The U.S. has long seen Georgia and Ukraine as counterweights to
    Russia's influence in the region. Opposition leaders in the two
    countries came to power after U.S.-backed popular protests in 2003
    and 2004. Their ascension advanced an American strategy of expanding
    NATO to include both countries and securing energy routes from the
    Caspian Sea that bypass Russia. The BP Plc-led Baku- Tbilisi-Ceyhan
    oil pipeline to Turkey runs through Georgia.

    The future effectiveness of that policy is now in doubt, with Georgia's
    U.S.-educated President Mikheil Saakashvili, 40, weakened by a five-day
    blitz that his American patrons were powerless to halt.

    Medvedev, 42, and Putin, 56, say Russia began the offensive in response
    to a drive by Georgia to restore control over the breakaway region
    of South Ossetia. Now Russia has ousted Georgian forces from there
    and from Abkhazia, another separatist region, and destroyed much of
    the central government's military.

    Less Confident

    "Georgia will be enormously more careful in its actions in the future,
    and much less confident of its relationship with the United States,"
    said U.S.-based geopolitical advisory group Stratfor in a research
    note.

    NATO is due in December to review the two countries' bids to join the
    Western military alliance. NATO leaders in April promised Ukraine
    and Georgia eventual membership while declining them fast- track
    status. Russia, which has also denounced U.S. plans to station
    missile defense sites in former Soviet satellites Poland and the
    Czech Republic, says the expansion of the Cold War-era alliance to
    its borders is a security threat.

    NATO should affirm the potential of Georgia and Ukraine to become
    alliance members in the face of Russia's incursion into Georgia,
    senior U.S. officials said yesterday in Washington.

    "Russia may find it convenient to raise the level of tension with
    Ukraine in the run-up to the December NATO review," Citigroup
    Inc.'s London-based David Lubin and Ali Al- Eyd wrote in a note to
    clients. "If the conflict with Russia decelerates or reverses Georgia's
    integration with the West, a similar fate could also affect Ukraine."

    Divided Country

    Ukraine has a large Russian-speaking population in the south and
    east that opposes NATO entry and looks to Moscow. Russian officials
    warn that if President Viktor Yushchenko pushes Ukraine into NATO,
    the nation may split in two. Russia has made its displeasure with
    Ukraine clear in recent years, cutting off gas supplies to the country
    in 2005 and reducing deliveries earlier this year.

    The military operation in Georgia will serve "as a warning" to
    Ukraine that it should desist from petitioning for NATO entry,
    said Janusz Bugajski, director of the New European Democracies
    Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in
    Washington. "Otherwise, Moscow may intervene to protect the allegedly
    threatened interests of the Russian population."

    Too Aggressive

    An overly aggressive move by Russia against Ukraine might invite a
    backlash, said Renaissance Capital's Smith.

    "If it reacts too violently against Ukraine, then it risks provoking
    the reaction it least wants: trade and investment barriers for its
    companies, a more antagonistic approach to energy transit, and above
    all, it risks scaring Ukraine into seeking western protection,"
    he said.

    Germany and France opposed NATO entry for Georgia and Ukraine because
    of the Georgian separatist disputes and opposition to membership among
    some Ukrainians. They now will feel their concerns have been justified,
    said Cliff Kupchan of New-York based Eurasia Group a political risk
    consulting firm.

    "Considering both European reticence and possible fears about Ukraine,
    I think it is very much on the slow track," he said, referring to
    NATO membership for both states.

    The assault by Russian artillery, tanks and bombers inflicted
    significant damage on Georgia's armed forces, which last month
    increased their size to 37,000 soldiers. Russia's military has 1.13
    million personnel. The U.S. trained and equipped Georgia's military
    and in 2006 approved almost $300 million in aid over five years.

    Army Regroups

    "A substantial part of our military power has been destroyed," said
    Georgian National Security Council chief Kakha Lomaia. "However,
    we did preserve the core of our army, and have managed to regroup it
    close to the capital."

    An airbase in Senaki was destroyed and three Georgian ships blown up
    in the Black Sea port of Poti, he said.

    A month ago, about 1,000 U.S. soldiers joined 600 Georgians and 100
    from Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Armenia in joint exercises at the Vaziani
    military base near Tbilisi. Russia repeatedly bombed the base during
    this month's war.

    "The American role in the region has been weakened," Jan Techau,
    a European and security affairs analyst at the German Council on
    Foreign Relations in Berlin, said in a telephone interview. "It's a
    reassertion of Russia's dominant role in the region."

    Ian Hague, a Bank of Georgia board member and fund manager with
    $1.8 billion in the former Soviet Union, said the attack on Georgia
    discouraged Western investments in energy infrastructure by raising
    the risk premium.

    "It's somewhat reminiscent, in 1939, when Stalin attacked Finland,"
    former U.S. national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski told
    Bloomberg Television. "I think this kind of confrontation is the best
    kind of answer as to why they are seeking to be members of NATO."
    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X