Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What Will The Unification Of Tax And Customs Service Give

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What Will The Unification Of Tax And Customs Service Give

    WHAT WILL THE UNIFICATION OF TAX AND CUSTOMS SERVICE GIVE
    Vasak Tarposhyan

    Hayots Ashkharh Daily
    21 Aug 2008
    Armenia

    As we know by President Serge Sargsyan's decree the Customs State
    Committee and Tax State Committee merge into one State Income
    Committee.

    During the recent years the issue of the reunification of tax and
    customs service has always been discussed. But for different reasons
    no practical steps were taken in that regard. For the last 7 years
    tax and customs services have been working separately. If in terms
    of the collection of tax entries it did show some good results,
    the same can't be said about the improvement of the economic field.

    There were lots of failings in tax and customs system, which required
    a review. The role of these two structures is especially important
    in terms of the provision of economic rivalry and the formation
    of an equal field, whereas the situation in Armenia in that regard
    is far not a secret. And one of the main reasons is that these two
    structures used to function separately, sometimes giving chance for the
    formation of shadow economy and the intensification of disproportionate
    competitive relations.

    Undeniably, by separated structure, during the previous years the tax
    officers ensured significant growth of entry: the average yearly growth
    of income fluctuates within 25-30%. But nevertheless the percentage
    of tax collection in gross domestic product i s significantly small
    in Armenia. Actually during the recent one-two years this index is
    being improved, but it still remains very small as compared with not
    only the developing but also regional countries.

    If in Georgia tax-GDP ratio reaches 24-25%, in Armenia, as of the
    last year's results it made up 16,1%. Of course a serious growth
    is predicted for this year. But it will never solve the issue of
    overcoming the obstacles created in economy and tax system.

    The issue of the low level of tax-GDP ratio in Armenia was permanently
    raised by international financial organizations. Of course there are
    certain objective reasons for that. But it is a fact that the growth
    of shadow economy is the main one.

    No matter how the previewed indexes of the tax income were permanently
    completed during the recent years, the separate functioning of
    the tax officers created favorable conditions for the formation of
    shadow economy.

    And the existence of unequal competitive field is the bases of the
    before mentioned.

    The issue first of all exists in the tax field, in the sphere of the
    realization of imported goods. As a consequence of not coordinated
    actions, which was conditioned by the separate functioning of
    tax-customs system lots of goods imported to Armenia get lost in
    the tax field. By realizing these goods in hidden ways the importers
    evade taxes.

    As a consequence of all the before mentioned not only does the state
    budget, but also the whole economy that loses its competitive
    advantages suffer. It serves as a reason for the so-called
    "undocumented" commodity circulation, which becomes one of the bases
    of the formation of shadow.

    The second important factor of the unification of tax-collecting
    bodies is the transformation of the goods from the tax field by customs
    border. That is to say the export. As we know the export from Armenia
    is not only free of taxes but the principle of VAT compensation also
    functions. Whereas certain phenomena take place in this process due
    to which only the income of the state suffers.

    We must also underscore that in Armenia tax and customs services used
    to function jointly, as one ministry. But in that status the system
    worked for only 2 years, which is naturally a very short term for
    the assessment of the productiveness of similar structure.
Working...
X