Tweet
Today's Zaman, Turkey
Aug 24 2008
Turkey's Caucasus boat likely to sail
Turkey is in a bid to be the shipyard for the construction of a boat
called "Caucasia Stability and Cooperation Platform," with five
sailors on the boat having "deep-frozen conflicts" with each other.
Views regarding the proposed platform differ, with some suggesting
that this boat is destined to sink even before setting sail for the
first time, while others say that it may be a good idea for those five
sailors -- Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Russia and Turkey -- to be on
their own in the high seas so they can put their heads together to
discuss their issues with each other. Ankara's proposal for the
platform came after a regional crisis erupted following a Georgian
military offensive in its Russian-backed breakaway region of South
Ossetia earlier this month. In the first half of August, PM Recep
Tayyip ErdoÄ?an paid successive visits to Moscow and Tbilisi and
earlier this week traveled to Baku to promote and gain support for the
proposed platform. Both Georgian and Russian leaders said they would
welcome the idea, while a joint statement released by ErdoÄ?an
and Azerbaijan's President Ilham Aliyev said Baku had approached the
proposal "positively."
Armenia and Azerbaijan are in a state of enmity due to Armenia's
continued occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh in Azerbaijan, and observers
say a regional alliance including both countries as members may be
difficult to implement. With Armenian troops still in
Nagorno-Karabakh, Azerbaijani leadership is unlikely to warm to any
sort of cooperation with Yerevan.
Speaking at a joint press conference with Aliyev, ErdoÄ?an did
not refer to Armenia and said instead Turkey was willing to further
cooperation with Azerbaijan and Georgia for peace and stability in the
Caucasus. He also said the Nagorno-Karabakh problem should be resolved
on the basis of principles of international law and through peaceful
ways. Aliyev thanked Turkey for its supportive stance.
Ahead of his departure for Baku on Aug. 20, however, ErdoÄ?an
disclosed Ankara's eagerness for Armenia's participation in a
"Caucasus alliance," as he said it would greatly increase regional
stability. He said the form of talks with Armenia would be set
following Babacan's consultations with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey
Lavrov.
In the meantime, as of Aug. 16 and 17, Babacan initiated a hectic
telephone diplomacy, having talks with US Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice; EU term president France's Foreign Minister Bernard
Kouchner; German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier; Council of
Europe term president Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt; and
Alexander Stubb, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe (OSCE) chairman-in-office and Finnish foreign minister.
His talks focusing on Turkey's proposal took place before he departed
for Brussels to participate in a key meeting of NATO foreign
ministers, who had emergency talks to reconsider the alliance's ties
with Russia after the conflict in Georgia.
As of Thursday this week, remarks by Georgian Ambassador to Turkey
Grigol Mgaloblishvili, who firmly said that his country would not
participate in the proposed cooperation platform for the Caucasus as
long as Russia doesn't entirely withdraw its forces from Georgian
soil, led to curiosity over whether Tbilisi's initial welcome to the
idea was just out of courtesy.
In an initial reaction to the Turkish plans to involve Armenia in the
Caucasus talks, Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian said
Yerevan welcomed the Turkish initiative. "Armenia was always in favor
of dialogue and talks, particularly on the issues concerning
cooperation and security in our region. The Turkish prime minister's
statement on the intention to start talks with Armenia on this agenda
could be welcomed," he said in a statement in response to a question
posed by Today's Zaman on Wednesday.
It is not clear what shape the planned talks with Armenia will
take. Turkey severed its ties with Armenia in the early 1990s in
protest of the Armenian occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh. According to
official Turkish policy, normalization of ties depends on Armenian
withdrawal from Nagorno-Karabakh, the termination of the Armenian
policy of supporting claims of an Armenian genocide at the hands of
the Ottoman Empire and an official endorsement by Armenia of the
current borders between the two countries.
As of Friday afternoon Babacan, as expected, initiated a telephone
conversation with Russia's Lavrov and spoke of the proposed platform.
"During the conversation, Mr. Babacan conveyed our concrete proposals
concerning the Caucasia Stability and Cooperation Platform to the
Russian side," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Burak
Ã-zügergin told the Anatolia news agency. The two ministers
decided to meet next week within this framework, Ã-zügergin
said, noting that the two also decided to hold another meeting in
early September.
Russia's 'one package for all'
If this platform can at least bring together in Ankara the foreign
ministers of the two sides -- Georgia and Russia, who say that they
will not meet with each other for the time being -- then it will take
an important step on the way to building peace and stability in the
Caucasus, believes Associate Professor Kasım Kamer.
South Ossetia, Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh are all "frozen
conflicts," Kamer, a Caucasia expert of the Ankara-based International
Strategic Research Organization (ISRO/ USAK), first of all noted,
while speaking with Sunday's Zaman.
"OSCE [the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe] is
ineffective in regards to the Nagorno-Karabakh issue, since Russia is
one of the co-chairs in the OSCE Minsk Group. If such a Caucasia
platform is established, Russia's participation in this body is
inevitable, and if Turkey can get Russia and Georgia together under
the same roof, then this will be a success by itself," Kamer said.
"Both Russia and Georgia do not want to give up South Ossetia and
Abkhazia at the same time. However there may be a bargaining on the
two regions, while Georgia will definitely be very stubborn, as it
considers both of the regions its own soil. On the other side, there
is a deep lack of confidence vis-à-vis Russia, a lack of
confidence which makes expectation of great consequences from this
platform in the short run very difficult. Russia's main goal was to
topple Saakashvili with its recent move; it would either walk to
Tbilisi in order to enter the capital or it would force Georgia to
give major concessions, like withdrawing half of its troops from the
disputed regions. Nevertheless, none took place, and it seems
Saakashvili will remain in power for a considerable time. Thus Russia
couldn't reach its eventual goal," he explained.
The Nagorno-Karabakh factor
When asked about the possibility of any improvement in resolution of
the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan in the
event of their sitting around the same table within the framework of
the proposed platform, Kamer underlined that Armenia's acceptance of
Turkey's mediation in the international legal sense doesn't seem
possible, since Turkey is a party in this dispute. On the other hand,
the same thing applies to Russia's mediation from the point of view of
Azerbaijan, as according to Azerbaijan, Russia is a party in this
dispute, he said.
"What could happen is this: The parties come together around the same
table, and they can take steps regarding secondary issues related to
Nagorno-Karabakh, for example the refugee issue. In the long run,
Russia has a tendency to introduce the issues of Nagorno-Karabakh,
South Ossetia and Abkhazia in one package, which will not be
acceptable for a large majority of the international community because
the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh is entirely different from all
others, since Armenia is de facto on Azerbaijan soil via invading
Nagorno-Karabakh. Following the unilateral declaration of Kosovo's
independence and its recognition by the world, Russia has become
increasingly aggressive concerning the issue of Nagorno-Karabakh. But
it is impossible to put these issues in the same file -- neither
geographically nor historically [can this be done]. Even looking at
the significant differences of population between Kosovo and these
regions make this point clear," Kamer said.
"We also have this triangle of Caucasia, the United States and
Turkey. The US is actually looking favorably at all kinds of moves of
rapprochement between Turkey and Armenia. Yet a significant step by
Armenia is not easy to be taken in the short term due to the clout of
the hard-liner Karabakh clan with the leadership of the country. As a
matter of fact, Turkey's conditions for reopening the border and
re-establishing diplomatic relations are quite moderate," he added.
Does anyone have a better idea?
According to retired Ambassador Ã-zdem Sanberk, a former Foreign
Ministry undersecretary and an esteemed foreign policy analyst,
Turkish diplomacy has taken a very appropriate step that deserves
appreciation -- via maturation of the idea of the Caucasia
platform. Sanberk also has a strong conviction that this initiative is
destined to "take off," given that Russia, one of the two countries
key to rendering the initiative successful, has approached Turkey's
idea positively. The other is the United States, which should
definitely not be excluded from this process, he says.
"If someone has a better idea, then s/he should come forward and tell
us this better idea," Sanberk told Sunday's Zaman, saying that he
could not agree with those analysts and politicians who suggest that
Turkey's proposed platform is "a stillborn idea."
"Such an initiative could not be taken without having Russia's
consent, and Turkey gained this consent. Nobody takes initiatives with
consequences or success being taken for granted, as there is always a
calculated risk. When Turkey initiated the Black Sea Economic
Cooperation back in the early 1990s, the same kinds of comments were
made, suggesting that the idea was not realistic at all. But it took
off. Later it lost its vigorousness due to neglect by the governments
of the time, starting from 1996," Sanberk said, while bringing to mind
a similar idea for constituting a Caucasia cooperation platform put
forward in 1999 by the then-President Süleyman Demirel.
"Unfortunately the coalition government led by late Prime Minister
Bülent Ecevit and the next president, Ahmet Necdet Sezer,
neglected the idea put forward by Demirel purely on political
concerns, since it was not first floated by them, and it failed before
it was born," Sanbek continued.
As for the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) coming to
power for the first time in 2002, it handled the European Union
membership process as a priority and made a very appropriate decision
by doing so, Sanberk said, adding however, he wished the AK Party
government had also made the Caucasus platform idea a priority and had
matured it simultaneously with the other priorities, such as playing a
key role in the Middle East.
"When governments give clear signals about their priorities, the
people of Turkey read this message and act accordingly and make the
necessary sacrifices falling on their shoulders. In the case of the
absence of clear signals and messages, extreme ideas such as Turkey
joining the Shanghai Five or its establishing a new front with Iran
and Russia gain currency in the town," the veteran diplomat said,
highlighting the influence of foreign policy messages on domestic
politics as well.
Turning back to the proposed Caucasia platform, Sanberk said that
today's circumstances were not sustainable for Russia, although it had
manipulated very good chess maneuvers in the recent incidents by
showing off its military capacity at a time when the European
continent's security capacity was overstretched.
"But now it needs sustainable power, and it cannot rely forever and
solely upon the ups and downs in natural gas prices to maintain its
power. This should be well explained by Turkey to Russia, with which
it has a strategic relationship. Moscow should understand that the
Soviet Union cannot be re-established and that the current situation
is not in its interests, either. As for the Georgian ambassador's
remarks, they are not surprising, Tbilisi is naturally trying to
maintain its position at this phase.
"I find comments suggesting that a new cold war era has started as
exaggerated, but it is obvious that the cards are being
redistributed. And that this is happening -- putting forward
constructive and positive ideas -- as Ankara has been doing, is
extremely good," Sanberk said. "The fact that this idea has not been
rejected spells that it will be able to stand on its own feet. Even if
these five countries come together and set a date for their second
meeting without making a concrete decision over disputed issues, this
will be a real success."
`EU, US should be well informed'
As of Tuesday, during a briefing at the US State Department's Foreign
Press Center on the "Situation in Georgia and Implications for the
Caucasus," Prime Minister Recep Tayyip ErdoÄ?an's proposal for a
Caucasus cooperation platform appeared to have received a lukewarm
response from the State Department's top diplomat for Eurasian and
Caucasian affairs.
"I must say I was surprised," Matt Bryza, the US deputy assistant
secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, was quoted as
saying by the Anatolia news agency at the briefing. "I hadn't been
briefed that that was going to happen. We have a partnership with
Turkey on the Caucasus, and I presume that we'll be able to work
together very closely now with our allies in Turkey since we do have
clearly shared interests, not to mention values, throughout the
Caucasus with our Turkish ally."
According to Associate Professor Kasım Kamer, the United States
would like to actively take place in such a platform, and those
remarks reflect their disappointment over the perception they got as
if they were being excluded on purpose from this platform by Turkey.
"Russia's actions in Gori led to an environment of cold war, and
Washington was actually not expecting such action by Russia, which
fuelled already existing doubts over Moscow's respect for Georgia's
sovereignty. All of these facts might have led to such a distanced
manner by the United States; however, in the long term, this platform
is also in the interest of the United States," Kamer, of the
Ankara-based International Strategic Research Organization (ISRO/
USAK), told Sunday's Zaman.
Retired Ambassador Ã-zdem Sanberk, a former Foreign Ministry
undersecretary, was actively involved in 2001 in the arrangement and
conduct of series of conferences under the title "Seeking Stability in
the Caucasus," initiated by the Ä°stanbul-based Turkish Economic
and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV).
The late Ä°smail Cem, then foreign minister, had also attended
those conferences -- during which establishment of a Caucasus
Stability Pact was discussed.
"Then we were discussing the involvement of the United States and Iran
in the issue; today there is no US aspect of the issue at the time
being, but Washington should definitely be persuaded to effectively
support this initiative," Sanberk told Sunday's Zaman.
"The Western world in general, for example via NATO, and the United
States in particular should be appropriately briefed that their
interests in the region will be protected. In this regard,
Mr. Babacan's telephone talks are very positive. Yet I believe that
the level should be upgraded with Mr. Prime Minister [Recep Tayyip]
ErdoÄ?an holding talks with EU term president France's leader
Nicolas Sarkozy as well as with the EU's foreign policy chief Javier
Solana," the veteran diplomat added.
Approached by Sunday's Zaman on Friday and invited to comment on the
Turkish proposal, US Embassy Press Attaché Kathryn Schalow
first of all praised Turkey's efforts as a regional player.
"As we have seen in the recent past, Turkey has played an important
role in the region, and we hope that Turkey's new efforts to promote
stability in the South Caucasus will be in harmony with other
international efforts to promote peace, prosperity and stability in
the Caucasus -- including through NATO, the EU and the OSCE," Schalow
told Sunday's Zaman. "And we look forward to consulting with Ankara on
its Caucasus platform concept," she added. Ankara Today's Zaman
24 August 2008, Sunday
EMÄ°NE KART ANKARA
Aug 24 2008
Turkey's Caucasus boat likely to sail
Turkey is in a bid to be the shipyard for the construction of a boat
called "Caucasia Stability and Cooperation Platform," with five
sailors on the boat having "deep-frozen conflicts" with each other.
Views regarding the proposed platform differ, with some suggesting
that this boat is destined to sink even before setting sail for the
first time, while others say that it may be a good idea for those five
sailors -- Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Russia and Turkey -- to be on
their own in the high seas so they can put their heads together to
discuss their issues with each other. Ankara's proposal for the
platform came after a regional crisis erupted following a Georgian
military offensive in its Russian-backed breakaway region of South
Ossetia earlier this month. In the first half of August, PM Recep
Tayyip ErdoÄ?an paid successive visits to Moscow and Tbilisi and
earlier this week traveled to Baku to promote and gain support for the
proposed platform. Both Georgian and Russian leaders said they would
welcome the idea, while a joint statement released by ErdoÄ?an
and Azerbaijan's President Ilham Aliyev said Baku had approached the
proposal "positively."
Armenia and Azerbaijan are in a state of enmity due to Armenia's
continued occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh in Azerbaijan, and observers
say a regional alliance including both countries as members may be
difficult to implement. With Armenian troops still in
Nagorno-Karabakh, Azerbaijani leadership is unlikely to warm to any
sort of cooperation with Yerevan.
Speaking at a joint press conference with Aliyev, ErdoÄ?an did
not refer to Armenia and said instead Turkey was willing to further
cooperation with Azerbaijan and Georgia for peace and stability in the
Caucasus. He also said the Nagorno-Karabakh problem should be resolved
on the basis of principles of international law and through peaceful
ways. Aliyev thanked Turkey for its supportive stance.
Ahead of his departure for Baku on Aug. 20, however, ErdoÄ?an
disclosed Ankara's eagerness for Armenia's participation in a
"Caucasus alliance," as he said it would greatly increase regional
stability. He said the form of talks with Armenia would be set
following Babacan's consultations with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey
Lavrov.
In the meantime, as of Aug. 16 and 17, Babacan initiated a hectic
telephone diplomacy, having talks with US Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice; EU term president France's Foreign Minister Bernard
Kouchner; German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier; Council of
Europe term president Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt; and
Alexander Stubb, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe (OSCE) chairman-in-office and Finnish foreign minister.
His talks focusing on Turkey's proposal took place before he departed
for Brussels to participate in a key meeting of NATO foreign
ministers, who had emergency talks to reconsider the alliance's ties
with Russia after the conflict in Georgia.
As of Thursday this week, remarks by Georgian Ambassador to Turkey
Grigol Mgaloblishvili, who firmly said that his country would not
participate in the proposed cooperation platform for the Caucasus as
long as Russia doesn't entirely withdraw its forces from Georgian
soil, led to curiosity over whether Tbilisi's initial welcome to the
idea was just out of courtesy.
In an initial reaction to the Turkish plans to involve Armenia in the
Caucasus talks, Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian said
Yerevan welcomed the Turkish initiative. "Armenia was always in favor
of dialogue and talks, particularly on the issues concerning
cooperation and security in our region. The Turkish prime minister's
statement on the intention to start talks with Armenia on this agenda
could be welcomed," he said in a statement in response to a question
posed by Today's Zaman on Wednesday.
It is not clear what shape the planned talks with Armenia will
take. Turkey severed its ties with Armenia in the early 1990s in
protest of the Armenian occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh. According to
official Turkish policy, normalization of ties depends on Armenian
withdrawal from Nagorno-Karabakh, the termination of the Armenian
policy of supporting claims of an Armenian genocide at the hands of
the Ottoman Empire and an official endorsement by Armenia of the
current borders between the two countries.
As of Friday afternoon Babacan, as expected, initiated a telephone
conversation with Russia's Lavrov and spoke of the proposed platform.
"During the conversation, Mr. Babacan conveyed our concrete proposals
concerning the Caucasia Stability and Cooperation Platform to the
Russian side," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Burak
Ã-zügergin told the Anatolia news agency. The two ministers
decided to meet next week within this framework, Ã-zügergin
said, noting that the two also decided to hold another meeting in
early September.
Russia's 'one package for all'
If this platform can at least bring together in Ankara the foreign
ministers of the two sides -- Georgia and Russia, who say that they
will not meet with each other for the time being -- then it will take
an important step on the way to building peace and stability in the
Caucasus, believes Associate Professor Kasım Kamer.
South Ossetia, Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh are all "frozen
conflicts," Kamer, a Caucasia expert of the Ankara-based International
Strategic Research Organization (ISRO/ USAK), first of all noted,
while speaking with Sunday's Zaman.
"OSCE [the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe] is
ineffective in regards to the Nagorno-Karabakh issue, since Russia is
one of the co-chairs in the OSCE Minsk Group. If such a Caucasia
platform is established, Russia's participation in this body is
inevitable, and if Turkey can get Russia and Georgia together under
the same roof, then this will be a success by itself," Kamer said.
"Both Russia and Georgia do not want to give up South Ossetia and
Abkhazia at the same time. However there may be a bargaining on the
two regions, while Georgia will definitely be very stubborn, as it
considers both of the regions its own soil. On the other side, there
is a deep lack of confidence vis-à-vis Russia, a lack of
confidence which makes expectation of great consequences from this
platform in the short run very difficult. Russia's main goal was to
topple Saakashvili with its recent move; it would either walk to
Tbilisi in order to enter the capital or it would force Georgia to
give major concessions, like withdrawing half of its troops from the
disputed regions. Nevertheless, none took place, and it seems
Saakashvili will remain in power for a considerable time. Thus Russia
couldn't reach its eventual goal," he explained.
The Nagorno-Karabakh factor
When asked about the possibility of any improvement in resolution of
the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan in the
event of their sitting around the same table within the framework of
the proposed platform, Kamer underlined that Armenia's acceptance of
Turkey's mediation in the international legal sense doesn't seem
possible, since Turkey is a party in this dispute. On the other hand,
the same thing applies to Russia's mediation from the point of view of
Azerbaijan, as according to Azerbaijan, Russia is a party in this
dispute, he said.
"What could happen is this: The parties come together around the same
table, and they can take steps regarding secondary issues related to
Nagorno-Karabakh, for example the refugee issue. In the long run,
Russia has a tendency to introduce the issues of Nagorno-Karabakh,
South Ossetia and Abkhazia in one package, which will not be
acceptable for a large majority of the international community because
the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh is entirely different from all
others, since Armenia is de facto on Azerbaijan soil via invading
Nagorno-Karabakh. Following the unilateral declaration of Kosovo's
independence and its recognition by the world, Russia has become
increasingly aggressive concerning the issue of Nagorno-Karabakh. But
it is impossible to put these issues in the same file -- neither
geographically nor historically [can this be done]. Even looking at
the significant differences of population between Kosovo and these
regions make this point clear," Kamer said.
"We also have this triangle of Caucasia, the United States and
Turkey. The US is actually looking favorably at all kinds of moves of
rapprochement between Turkey and Armenia. Yet a significant step by
Armenia is not easy to be taken in the short term due to the clout of
the hard-liner Karabakh clan with the leadership of the country. As a
matter of fact, Turkey's conditions for reopening the border and
re-establishing diplomatic relations are quite moderate," he added.
Does anyone have a better idea?
According to retired Ambassador Ã-zdem Sanberk, a former Foreign
Ministry undersecretary and an esteemed foreign policy analyst,
Turkish diplomacy has taken a very appropriate step that deserves
appreciation -- via maturation of the idea of the Caucasia
platform. Sanberk also has a strong conviction that this initiative is
destined to "take off," given that Russia, one of the two countries
key to rendering the initiative successful, has approached Turkey's
idea positively. The other is the United States, which should
definitely not be excluded from this process, he says.
"If someone has a better idea, then s/he should come forward and tell
us this better idea," Sanberk told Sunday's Zaman, saying that he
could not agree with those analysts and politicians who suggest that
Turkey's proposed platform is "a stillborn idea."
"Such an initiative could not be taken without having Russia's
consent, and Turkey gained this consent. Nobody takes initiatives with
consequences or success being taken for granted, as there is always a
calculated risk. When Turkey initiated the Black Sea Economic
Cooperation back in the early 1990s, the same kinds of comments were
made, suggesting that the idea was not realistic at all. But it took
off. Later it lost its vigorousness due to neglect by the governments
of the time, starting from 1996," Sanberk said, while bringing to mind
a similar idea for constituting a Caucasia cooperation platform put
forward in 1999 by the then-President Süleyman Demirel.
"Unfortunately the coalition government led by late Prime Minister
Bülent Ecevit and the next president, Ahmet Necdet Sezer,
neglected the idea put forward by Demirel purely on political
concerns, since it was not first floated by them, and it failed before
it was born," Sanbek continued.
As for the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) coming to
power for the first time in 2002, it handled the European Union
membership process as a priority and made a very appropriate decision
by doing so, Sanberk said, adding however, he wished the AK Party
government had also made the Caucasus platform idea a priority and had
matured it simultaneously with the other priorities, such as playing a
key role in the Middle East.
"When governments give clear signals about their priorities, the
people of Turkey read this message and act accordingly and make the
necessary sacrifices falling on their shoulders. In the case of the
absence of clear signals and messages, extreme ideas such as Turkey
joining the Shanghai Five or its establishing a new front with Iran
and Russia gain currency in the town," the veteran diplomat said,
highlighting the influence of foreign policy messages on domestic
politics as well.
Turning back to the proposed Caucasia platform, Sanberk said that
today's circumstances were not sustainable for Russia, although it had
manipulated very good chess maneuvers in the recent incidents by
showing off its military capacity at a time when the European
continent's security capacity was overstretched.
"But now it needs sustainable power, and it cannot rely forever and
solely upon the ups and downs in natural gas prices to maintain its
power. This should be well explained by Turkey to Russia, with which
it has a strategic relationship. Moscow should understand that the
Soviet Union cannot be re-established and that the current situation
is not in its interests, either. As for the Georgian ambassador's
remarks, they are not surprising, Tbilisi is naturally trying to
maintain its position at this phase.
"I find comments suggesting that a new cold war era has started as
exaggerated, but it is obvious that the cards are being
redistributed. And that this is happening -- putting forward
constructive and positive ideas -- as Ankara has been doing, is
extremely good," Sanberk said. "The fact that this idea has not been
rejected spells that it will be able to stand on its own feet. Even if
these five countries come together and set a date for their second
meeting without making a concrete decision over disputed issues, this
will be a real success."
`EU, US should be well informed'
As of Tuesday, during a briefing at the US State Department's Foreign
Press Center on the "Situation in Georgia and Implications for the
Caucasus," Prime Minister Recep Tayyip ErdoÄ?an's proposal for a
Caucasus cooperation platform appeared to have received a lukewarm
response from the State Department's top diplomat for Eurasian and
Caucasian affairs.
"I must say I was surprised," Matt Bryza, the US deputy assistant
secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, was quoted as
saying by the Anatolia news agency at the briefing. "I hadn't been
briefed that that was going to happen. We have a partnership with
Turkey on the Caucasus, and I presume that we'll be able to work
together very closely now with our allies in Turkey since we do have
clearly shared interests, not to mention values, throughout the
Caucasus with our Turkish ally."
According to Associate Professor Kasım Kamer, the United States
would like to actively take place in such a platform, and those
remarks reflect their disappointment over the perception they got as
if they were being excluded on purpose from this platform by Turkey.
"Russia's actions in Gori led to an environment of cold war, and
Washington was actually not expecting such action by Russia, which
fuelled already existing doubts over Moscow's respect for Georgia's
sovereignty. All of these facts might have led to such a distanced
manner by the United States; however, in the long term, this platform
is also in the interest of the United States," Kamer, of the
Ankara-based International Strategic Research Organization (ISRO/
USAK), told Sunday's Zaman.
Retired Ambassador Ã-zdem Sanberk, a former Foreign Ministry
undersecretary, was actively involved in 2001 in the arrangement and
conduct of series of conferences under the title "Seeking Stability in
the Caucasus," initiated by the Ä°stanbul-based Turkish Economic
and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV).
The late Ä°smail Cem, then foreign minister, had also attended
those conferences -- during which establishment of a Caucasus
Stability Pact was discussed.
"Then we were discussing the involvement of the United States and Iran
in the issue; today there is no US aspect of the issue at the time
being, but Washington should definitely be persuaded to effectively
support this initiative," Sanberk told Sunday's Zaman.
"The Western world in general, for example via NATO, and the United
States in particular should be appropriately briefed that their
interests in the region will be protected. In this regard,
Mr. Babacan's telephone talks are very positive. Yet I believe that
the level should be upgraded with Mr. Prime Minister [Recep Tayyip]
ErdoÄ?an holding talks with EU term president France's leader
Nicolas Sarkozy as well as with the EU's foreign policy chief Javier
Solana," the veteran diplomat added.
Approached by Sunday's Zaman on Friday and invited to comment on the
Turkish proposal, US Embassy Press Attaché Kathryn Schalow
first of all praised Turkey's efforts as a regional player.
"As we have seen in the recent past, Turkey has played an important
role in the region, and we hope that Turkey's new efforts to promote
stability in the South Caucasus will be in harmony with other
international efforts to promote peace, prosperity and stability in
the Caucasus -- including through NATO, the EU and the OSCE," Schalow
told Sunday's Zaman. "And we look forward to consulting with Ankara on
its Caucasus platform concept," she added. Ankara Today's Zaman
24 August 2008, Sunday
EMÄ°NE KART ANKARA