Tweet
NKR FOREIGN MINISTER`S ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS BY THE MEDIA
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
2008-12-16 16:20
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic
At the OSCE Ministerial Council meeting in Helsinki, 4 and 5 December,
the Azerbaijani delegation circulated a document, summarizing
its viewpoints on the principles of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict
settlement. What is Stepanakert`s position with respect to those
principles?
The attempts of the Azerbaijani party to impose on the mediators
and the world community in general, using different international
forums, its own vision of both the conflict between Nagorno Karabakh
and Azerbaijan, and the ways of its settlement are not a novelty. In
the framework of this policy, Baku resorts to different techniques,
in particular, presents itself as a victim of its own aggression
launched against the people of NKR and uses slogans for European
values and democracy as a cover for its goals.
Meanwhile, the latest statements by the Azerbaijani leadership, in
particular, the peculiar interpretation of provisions of the Moscow
Declaration by Ilham Aliyev, i.e the political settlement of the
conflict does not exclude use of force, as well as the above-mentioned
Azerbaijani principles of conflict settlement demonstrate all the
hypocrisy of the Azerbaijani diplomacy and thwart all the efforts
of the international community to find ways of peaceful resolution
of the conflict. Moreover, this kind of actions by Azerbaijan sho w
not only disrespect for the international mediators` work, but also
create an impression of Azerbaijan as an improper partner, which is
ready to denounce a previous agreement the very next day.
Have there been any changes in the position of official Baku towards
the settlement of the conflict between Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan
since 1988?
At all stages of the conflict development, Azerbaijan has been and
continues to be the main bearer of the idea of military resolution
of the conflict.
Counting on power turned into ethnic pogroms and expulsion of Armenians
from Sumgait, Baku, Kirovabad and other parts of the former Azerbaijani
SSR, which was followed by operation "Koltso" (Ring) on deportation
of the population of Armenian villages of the Shahoumian, Hadrout
and Shoushi regions of Nagorno Karabakh. During the military phase
of the conflict, Baku time and again moved away from restrictions and
termination of hostilities, frustrated cease-fire agreements, was the
first and repeated violator of the four UN Security Council Resolutions
on the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, and did not comprehensively and
promptly fulfill a single requirement of the resolutions. After the
cease-fire, the leadership of Azerbaijan has been actively and in
quantity purchasing offensive weapons, thus promoting arms race,
as well as continues threatening the Nagorno Karabakh Republic with
resumption of hostilities. The readiness to risk reg ional peace,
a basic precondition for social-economic development and realization
of international investment projects, makes the policy of official
Baku a serious threat not only to the Nagorno Karabakh Republic,
but also to regional peace and security.
Azerbaijan accuses Armenia of the intention to impose a fait accompli
based solution...
The current status quo is the result of aggression and consequent
hostilities of Azerbaijan against NKR and its people. As an
initiator of the war, Azerbaijan carries full responsibility for the
consequences. The existing status quo is the minimum that allowed
guaranteeing the security and independence of NKR and its people
under Azerbaijani aggression. The policy of the NKR authorities is
directed to maintaining peace and guaranteeing the irreversibility
of the process of establishment of long-time stability in the
region. Changing the status quo, as we see it, will inevitably lead
to destabilization of the situation and escalation of tensions with a
possible resumption of hostilities. During the years of Soviet rule,
the leadership of the Azerbaijani SSR, including "national leader"
Heydar Aliyev, was trying to make Nagorno Karabakh not self-sufficient
and dependent on Baku, first of all with their attempts to change the
demographic composition of the population. This was also the case while
drawing the borders of the former Nagorno Karabakh autonomous region.
Today, they are trying to retur n Nagorno Karabakh into the
past. However these attempts are doomed to failure.
Has the Nagorno Karabakh party received the "technical document",
which according to the information, provided by the French Co-chair
of the OSCE Minsk Group, was presented to the parties in Helsinki in
the framework of the OSCE Ministerial Council?
The Nagorno Karabakh authorities have not received this document yet;
however as a party to the conflict, acknowledged as such in accordance
with OSCE basic documents on the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, we expect
to get it soon from the Minsk Group Co-chairs.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
2008-12-16 16:20
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic
At the OSCE Ministerial Council meeting in Helsinki, 4 and 5 December,
the Azerbaijani delegation circulated a document, summarizing
its viewpoints on the principles of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict
settlement. What is Stepanakert`s position with respect to those
principles?
The attempts of the Azerbaijani party to impose on the mediators
and the world community in general, using different international
forums, its own vision of both the conflict between Nagorno Karabakh
and Azerbaijan, and the ways of its settlement are not a novelty. In
the framework of this policy, Baku resorts to different techniques,
in particular, presents itself as a victim of its own aggression
launched against the people of NKR and uses slogans for European
values and democracy as a cover for its goals.
Meanwhile, the latest statements by the Azerbaijani leadership, in
particular, the peculiar interpretation of provisions of the Moscow
Declaration by Ilham Aliyev, i.e the political settlement of the
conflict does not exclude use of force, as well as the above-mentioned
Azerbaijani principles of conflict settlement demonstrate all the
hypocrisy of the Azerbaijani diplomacy and thwart all the efforts
of the international community to find ways of peaceful resolution
of the conflict. Moreover, this kind of actions by Azerbaijan sho w
not only disrespect for the international mediators` work, but also
create an impression of Azerbaijan as an improper partner, which is
ready to denounce a previous agreement the very next day.
Have there been any changes in the position of official Baku towards
the settlement of the conflict between Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan
since 1988?
At all stages of the conflict development, Azerbaijan has been and
continues to be the main bearer of the idea of military resolution
of the conflict.
Counting on power turned into ethnic pogroms and expulsion of Armenians
from Sumgait, Baku, Kirovabad and other parts of the former Azerbaijani
SSR, which was followed by operation "Koltso" (Ring) on deportation
of the population of Armenian villages of the Shahoumian, Hadrout
and Shoushi regions of Nagorno Karabakh. During the military phase
of the conflict, Baku time and again moved away from restrictions and
termination of hostilities, frustrated cease-fire agreements, was the
first and repeated violator of the four UN Security Council Resolutions
on the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, and did not comprehensively and
promptly fulfill a single requirement of the resolutions. After the
cease-fire, the leadership of Azerbaijan has been actively and in
quantity purchasing offensive weapons, thus promoting arms race,
as well as continues threatening the Nagorno Karabakh Republic with
resumption of hostilities. The readiness to risk reg ional peace,
a basic precondition for social-economic development and realization
of international investment projects, makes the policy of official
Baku a serious threat not only to the Nagorno Karabakh Republic,
but also to regional peace and security.
Azerbaijan accuses Armenia of the intention to impose a fait accompli
based solution...
The current status quo is the result of aggression and consequent
hostilities of Azerbaijan against NKR and its people. As an
initiator of the war, Azerbaijan carries full responsibility for the
consequences. The existing status quo is the minimum that allowed
guaranteeing the security and independence of NKR and its people
under Azerbaijani aggression. The policy of the NKR authorities is
directed to maintaining peace and guaranteeing the irreversibility
of the process of establishment of long-time stability in the
region. Changing the status quo, as we see it, will inevitably lead
to destabilization of the situation and escalation of tensions with a
possible resumption of hostilities. During the years of Soviet rule,
the leadership of the Azerbaijani SSR, including "national leader"
Heydar Aliyev, was trying to make Nagorno Karabakh not self-sufficient
and dependent on Baku, first of all with their attempts to change the
demographic composition of the population. This was also the case while
drawing the borders of the former Nagorno Karabakh autonomous region.
Today, they are trying to retur n Nagorno Karabakh into the
past. However these attempts are doomed to failure.
Has the Nagorno Karabakh party received the "technical document",
which according to the information, provided by the French Co-chair
of the OSCE Minsk Group, was presented to the parties in Helsinki in
the framework of the OSCE Ministerial Council?
The Nagorno Karabakh authorities have not received this document yet;
however as a party to the conflict, acknowledged as such in accordance
with OSCE basic documents on the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, we expect
to get it soon from the Minsk Group Co-chairs.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress