Tweet
IRAQI KURD ARTICLE DISCUSSES TURK HISTORIAN'S THESIS ON ORIGINS OF ARMENIANS
by Stran Abdallah
Iraqi Patriotic Union of Kurdistan
Jan 28 2008
Aso, Kirkuk, Iraq
"The plight of Turkey"
The plight of Turkey is created by its historians. In the past, the
historians instilled the idea of purifying the Turkish language from
foreign words, particularly Arabic words, into [founder of Turkish
state] Kemal Ataturk.
They were busy with this issue when others [historians] said that the
world originated from the Turkish nation. So, Turkish is the language
of the entire world as long as the world originated from the Turks.
Then, why purify the Turkish language from the words of those other
languages that are themselves Turkish? Hence, a lie protected Turkey
from another more lie!
Now, another historian emerged who says that most of the Kurds
are originally ethnic Armenians and have turned themselves into
Kurds, otherwise, the Kurds numbered very few. This looks like the
Ba'thist propaganda of "nationality rectification", namely those
people were formerly turned into Kurds and they can now rectify their
nationality. In what era were the Kurds in Iraq and Turkey so powerful
[to prompt] other people to enlist themselves as Kurds.
What blessing and prosperity the Armenian enjoyed after they turned
into Kurds! If the Armenians had no choice but to change their
nationality, why did not they become dominant Muslim Turks, instead of
becoming a poor oppressed Kurd? If they are doomed to be mass-killed,
what difference can Kurdish or Armenian nationality make?
This historian wants, as does real historians, to use "facts", but the
"fact" here has to do with cheating [deception]: go and examine the
PKK [Kurdistan Workers' Party] guerrillas, you will find that they
have not been circumcised, because they are ethnic Armenians and
Christians do not practice circumcision!
Look what a plight do historians try to afflict on Turkey? [Turkish
Premier Recep Tayyip] Erdogan is now working on declaring an amnesty
for the guerrillas so that they leave the mountains. But the thesis
the historian presents is a big problem: for you need to be checked,
as you come down the mountains, whether you have been circumcised or
stayed as an Armenian!
Thus, in Turkey, if men stay in mountains, they may kill or get killed
in an encounter, or they may be captured and their head blown off. And
if they want to come down the mountains and respond to the amnesty,
a historian will stand by at the bottom of the valley to examine them
and may cut off flesh from them!
by Stran Abdallah
Iraqi Patriotic Union of Kurdistan
Jan 28 2008
Aso, Kirkuk, Iraq
"The plight of Turkey"
The plight of Turkey is created by its historians. In the past, the
historians instilled the idea of purifying the Turkish language from
foreign words, particularly Arabic words, into [founder of Turkish
state] Kemal Ataturk.
They were busy with this issue when others [historians] said that the
world originated from the Turkish nation. So, Turkish is the language
of the entire world as long as the world originated from the Turks.
Then, why purify the Turkish language from the words of those other
languages that are themselves Turkish? Hence, a lie protected Turkey
from another more lie!
Now, another historian emerged who says that most of the Kurds
are originally ethnic Armenians and have turned themselves into
Kurds, otherwise, the Kurds numbered very few. This looks like the
Ba'thist propaganda of "nationality rectification", namely those
people were formerly turned into Kurds and they can now rectify their
nationality. In what era were the Kurds in Iraq and Turkey so powerful
[to prompt] other people to enlist themselves as Kurds.
What blessing and prosperity the Armenian enjoyed after they turned
into Kurds! If the Armenians had no choice but to change their
nationality, why did not they become dominant Muslim Turks, instead of
becoming a poor oppressed Kurd? If they are doomed to be mass-killed,
what difference can Kurdish or Armenian nationality make?
This historian wants, as does real historians, to use "facts", but the
"fact" here has to do with cheating [deception]: go and examine the
PKK [Kurdistan Workers' Party] guerrillas, you will find that they
have not been circumcised, because they are ethnic Armenians and
Christians do not practice circumcision!
Look what a plight do historians try to afflict on Turkey? [Turkish
Premier Recep Tayyip] Erdogan is now working on declaring an amnesty
for the guerrillas so that they leave the mountains. But the thesis
the historian presents is a big problem: for you need to be checked,
as you come down the mountains, whether you have been circumcised or
stayed as an Armenian!
Thus, in Turkey, if men stay in mountains, they may kill or get killed
in an encounter, or they may be captured and their head blown off. And
if they want to come down the mountains and respond to the amnesty,
a historian will stand by at the bottom of the valley to examine them
and may cut off flesh from them!