Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BAKU: Identifying A Strategy Of The Future: A New Policy Towards Mod

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BAKU: Identifying A Strategy Of The Future: A New Policy Towards Mod

    IDENTIFYING A STRATEGY OF THE FUTURE: A NEW POLICY TOWARDS MODERNIZATION

    Day.Az
    Jan 10 2008
    Azerbaijan

    Lincoln's legacy

    "The work of a state in the long run is the work of the individuals
    composing it" (John Stuart Mill, 1806-1873; an ideologue of liberalism)

    On 19 November 1863 the American politician and statesman Abraham
    Lincoln (1809-1865) delivered a speech on the occasion of the opening
    of a memorial cemetery near Gettysburg for the victims of the Civil
    War in the USA which became an outstanding example of political
    eloquence. It was in this speech that Lincoln found a definition
    for democracy which has since become a classic. A former lumberjack
    and surveyor, the US president said the following: "We must swear
    our allegiance here to the great task facing us, and that is to do
    everything we possibly can to ensure that the sacrifices brought by
    those from whom we have accepted the baton of loyalty to the cause
    to which they fully devoted themselves, in hide and hair, that these
    sacrifices were not in vain, and that this nation before God will
    bring the beginning of a new birth of freedom and that the rule of
    people by the people and for the people will never disappear from
    the face of the earth."

    Today, about 200 years after the time when these remarkable and
    historically important words were spoken, the concept of democracy as
    "the rule of people, by the people and for the people" is as topical
    and crucial as ever. The world order, which is so often associated
    with unilateralism, is shaping a new concept of social reality,
    transferring to a new plane the place and role of the processes of
    global integration. It is becoming obvious that our "post-mankind
    future", as [the American philosopher] Francis Fukuyama recently wrote,
    is being modified and is changing under the influence of the new
    local factors derived from the general global system of coordinates.

    That is why here it is hard not to recall Friedrich Nietzsche,
    who wrote: "Enough! The time is coming when politics acquires a new
    meaning." And if [George] Hegel in 1806 and Fukuyama in 1999 were
    claiming the end of history, the former, basing himself on the lack of
    movement beyond the French Revolution, and the latter, being confident
    of the total triumph of liberalism after the collapse of the USSR,
    then in the new conditions of mondialism the question arises as to
    in what direction is history as a whole moving? This question is
    extremely topical for societies in transformation for which history
    predetermined the opportunity to formulate a new strategy of the
    future at the end of the last century.

    Reforms in Azerbaijan

    In the 20th century Azerbaijan experienced not only a change in
    its socioeconomic system, but also intensive reforms in political
    and public institutions. After Gorbachev's "democratisation", which
    brought with it a process of complete stagnation and the collapse of
    the communist system, which was already on the brink of total regress,
    there followed years of "Brown's" formation of statehood and the
    breakdown and decentralization of the power hierarchy connected with
    this. This period, which affected all the states of the post-Soviet
    space, remained in the memory of millions as an era of dashed hopes,
    frustrated illusions and lost positions.

    The optimism in relation to the global socialist stranglehold was
    very quickly replaced by uncertainty and pessimism over the future.

    As the well-known American transitologist V.Bunce points out,
    "post-communism is something considerably larger than a transition
    to democracy; it is a revolution extending to politics, economics
    and social life". (V.Bunce: Comparing East and West. "Journal of
    Democracy", Vol 6, No 3, 1995. p92).

    The discovery of independence set before the country the tasks of
    a transition from dictatorship to democracy, from a command economy
    to a free market, from being part of an empire with two centuries of
    history of expansionism to a nation state. The results of the social
    and geo-strategic realities of the epoch of Gorbachev's failings,
    as well as the subsequent institutional transformation gave rise to
    a syndrome of marginality which latently, but purposefully had an
    impact on shaping social, political and economic institutions.

    As time passed it was not only the way of life and people's standards
    of behaviour that changed, but the mechanisms of the inter-action
    between the governing and the governed, the "highs" and "lows" of
    society, as a whole were modified. At the same time, the institutional
    order which had been established by the epoch of communism, having
    suffered collapse, gave birth to the desire to use the world experience
    of political institutionalisation, having inevitably raised the
    question of the legitimacy and the means of borrowing this experience.

    In Azerbaijan in the middle of the 1990s [late President] Heydar
    Aliyev began socio-political and economic changes aimed at creating
    an independent state and strengthening statehood, the centralization
    of the processes of government and a slowing down the process of the
    stagnation of the national economy. This period of national history
    became the basis and the primary source of the firm etatistic approach
    to building national statehood that was necessary at that time, the
    basic concept of which was Realpolitik as a priority component of the
    political, economic and socio-cultural modernization of Azerbaijani
    society. This approach radically cancelled out the aspirations,
    based on political romanticism and short-sightedness, of those who
    saw Azerbaijan as an arena of a clash of interests and a platform
    for carrying out the experiments of various client groups.

    Entering new millennium

    In short, the end of the 20th century was a starting-off point for
    national transformation, and Azerbaijan entered the new millennium
    with a still unestablished institutional design, but at a level of
    political-economical development which today enables one to make
    judgements about real and effective steps in building a system of
    effective statehood. In recent years a whole raft of decisions aimed
    at modernization have been carried out enabling Azerbaijan to be
    transformed from a society with a weak and backward economic system,
    a decadent political institutional system and a marginalized public
    awareness into a country of new behavioural standards and stereotypes,
    a sound political system and gradually shaping democratic institutions,
    characteristic of the market system of an economic structure.

    The main thesis that was laid in the foundation of the structure
    of effective statehood consisted of a desire to ensure Azerbaijan's
    ability to compete in the market place in the regional processes and
    its full-fledged economic leadership of the South Caucasus.

    The formation of a sound political system required an understanding
    of one of the results of the 20th century, a lesson which was
    extracted at the price of colossal social cataclysms. It was the
    relative, but extremely important advantage of the democratic model of
    socio-political institutions. The possibility of social consolidation,
    the optimisation of government and inter-action between the social and
    political factors, which is created by a fine, graded and well-oiled
    system of democratic representative institutions substantially
    consolidates a situation that enables even more effective work of
    the market a most important factor of a democratically developed state.

    Today two aspects of national transition economic and political
    modernization determine socio-cultural transformation. Its substance
    in the main lies in transparency, new management stereotypes and
    other behavioural and socio-cultural standards and archetypes which
    have been "imported" to societies which are diverse in their stage
    of development and level of political and economic preparedness in
    the light of the broadening of the "third democratic wave" (see S.

    Huntington: "The Third Wave").

    Being a part of the "global democratic invasion", the changes in
    the socio-cultural background encourage the institutionalisation of
    post-industrial values, the formation of effective administrative
    factors and the building of a transparent social order. Democracy,
    a market economy and the ideal of a civic society have gradually
    been turned into the main reference point of the strategy of the
    development of society, thus becoming the fundamental links of a
    contemporary national state.

    >From economics to democracy

    "Politics is the same science as any other; it knows certain
    provisions, laws, rules, and also endless different combinations;
    it demands constant study and deep and long thought." (Jean-Paul
    Marat, 1743-1793)

    The year 2003 saw the beginning of a new stage of national
    transformation, shifting the carefully aligned stable political
    system to an environment of the intensive formation of an advancing
    economic structure. The basic concept of Ilham Aliyev's presidency
    was the formation of a strong economic base to encourage the gradual
    transformation of the mass consciousness and the socio-cultural basis
    of society towards a course of post-industrial values and democratic
    traditions. Along with this, it was necessary to resolve a complex
    of geo-strategic and geo-economic tasks, to provide stability and
    solidity of national growth and to turn the country into a subject
    and not an object - of international relations, because in an age
    of the worldwide transformations which shape the New World Order,
    it was extremely important to ensure Azerbaijan's participation in
    the global processes.

    In the context of understanding this fact, the country's political
    elite carried out a number of fateful projects which became
    an important factor in ensuring Azerbaijan's participation in
    integration initiatives. In recent years such global projects as
    the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan main export pipeline, which has enabled
    Azerbaijani oil to enter world markets, have been launched and the
    construction has begun of the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway, which will
    become an important link of regional economic cooperation, opening
    up future prospects for wide-scale cooperation between North and South.

    Within the context of the regeneration of the Great Silk Road,
    Azerbaijan is being turned not only into a transit country, but is
    frequently itself becoming an exporter, thus creating new opportunities
    and prospects for the national economy.

    At the same time, Azerbaijan is actively signing up to such projects
    as Nabucco, which provides for the transit of Azerbaijani natural
    gas through Georgia, Turkey, Greece and Italy and on to the countries
    of the European Union, and is cooperating closely with the EU within
    the framework of the New Neighbourhood programme. Azerbaijani gas is
    already being supplied to the markets of the EU to Greece. Being at
    the crossroads of two continents, Azerbaijan fulfils the role of a
    bridge which can span not only cultures and civilizations, but also the
    main economies of Europe and Asia. Taking advantage of its favourable
    geographical position, Azerbaijan is trying to make effective use
    of its potential. In the conditions of global competition, an active
    economic policy is a most important factor in the effective solution
    of national tasks.

    Growth of GDP

    At a national level measures have been taken in recent years which
    create preconditions: first, for a substantial reduction in the level
    of poverty in the county (it today stands at about 17 per cent),
    which helps to form a middle class in the country and is a most
    important aspect of a democratic developed society: second, for an
    increase in the role and significance of the national manufacturer,
    which qualitatively changes the character of the Azerbaijani economy;
    third, for changing the nature of mutual relations between the state
    and the private sector, which occurs in an evolutionary way, but in
    reality typifies the desire to build an effective and transparent
    system of relations, where the interests of all sides are taken into
    account, and law and order and legality are seen as priority factors.

    On the whole, the adoption of comprehensive measures, starting with
    the denomination of the manat up to a real growth in the country's
    GDP, from a significant improvement in the number of jobs by over
    600,000 to a tenfold increase in the national budget create a basis
    for a strong economic structure and sound economic growth.

    All this allows us to speak about the start of a process of the
    liberalization of the national economy a most important achievement
    of Ilham Aliyev's first presidential term. As the president notes:
    "In our country the proportion of the private sector in GDP is over 80
    per cent. This is still taking into account the fact that oil and gas
    are a state monopoly. This is the basis of the economy. A combination
    of all these factors and, of course, the stable situation and the
    trust of foreign investors in Azerbaijan have enabled us to achieve
    this. Of course, this could be said to be a world record to achieve
    a rate of growth of 30 and more per cent in three years. But for me
    the most important figure is not even this. A more important figure
    is the reduction in poverty in the country, because the level of GDP
    is still not an indicator that we have all taken advantage of these
    opportunities. The level of poverty has been reduced from 50 per cent
    in 2003 to 20 per cent in 2007." (from an interview to Moldovan TV,
    Channel 4, 19 December 2007)

    The emergence of Azerbaijani investors and their going abroad is
    another important aspect. The successful implementation of a number of
    projects in Georgia, Turkey and other European countries creates the
    opportunity for steady growth in foreign investment by Azerbaijan. This
    is a real precondition for implementing specific steps to change the
    structure of the national economy and to impart it with an innovative
    quality. In this aspect we abide by two most important factors: first
    investment abroad helps to create qualitatively different bilateral
    relations; second it is not so much volume that is important as
    the ability to correctly choose priorities. At the same time, it is
    important to maintain the country's economic policy, as chosen by
    President Ilham Aliyev in 2003.

    Liberalization of economy

    If one analyses the past year of 2007 as a whole, then one may boldly
    state that it was precisely this period that was the definitive
    stage in the liberalization of the national economy. A whole range of
    measures, including the beginning of the registration of entrepreneurs
    according to the "single window" principle, the liberalization of
    the inflow of direct foreign investments, the reorientation of
    priorities in state expenses in favour of spheres ensuring high
    economic return and profitability and providing the opportunity to
    improve the distribution of incomes, have become truly revolutionary
    changes which will encourage greater transparency of the work and
    system of registration of businesses and the effective development
    of the national economy.

    The economic component in the country, as a whole, is creating a real
    basis for a subsequent transformation from entrenched industrialism
    to a level of post-industrialism. Modern trends, which shape the
    current self-awareness and the national "me" of Azerbaijani society,
    are tacitly shifting, freeing up space for post-modernist political
    and economic factors. Globalization as such creates new opportunities
    and opens up broader prospects for the development of the national
    economy and improving political and democratic institutions.

    Therefore one may boldly claim that the main task of Ilham Aliyev's
    first term, which consisted of shaping a sound and advancing economic
    system, is being successfully implemented. It is precisely economic
    modernization, stability of the market, improvement in the banking
    sphere, formation of a middle class and strengthening the role of
    private enterprise in the country's GDP that will tacitly modify
    public awareness, turning them to a new level of democratic traditions
    and institutions.

    By virtue of the strengthening of the economy and ensuring the welfare
    of the citizens one may speak about a gradual democratisation of
    society and a transformation from a transient democracy to one of a
    stable, i.e. consolidated democracy. One should not forget that as
    the economy grows in transient states the social and institutional
    structure of society and the state changes. An increase in the solvency
    of the population, as well as the flow of investments, as a result of
    which the economy becomes more efficient and effective, encourage the
    gradual modernization of economic life. In turn, this gives rise, as
    Karl Marx wrote, to a situation where when the economy is modernized
    in a country, capitalism is strengthened and a bourgeoisie is formed,
    the transformation of the political system is inevitable. In Marxist
    terminology, changes in the basis will always lead to changes in
    the superstructure.

    Capitalism and democracy

    As the well-known American philosopher Francis Fukuyama points out,
    "relations between capitalism and democracy are not straightforward.

    Capitalism in itself does not put direct pressure on democracy. It gets
    along perfectly well with many forms of authoritarianism (although,
    of course, not with communist totalitarianism) and may even flourish
    in non-democratic countries. But capitalism is a more effective motor
    of economic growth than socialism, and therefore is more likely to
    generate rapid socioeconomic changes which favour the emergence of
    stable democracy" (F. Fukuyama, Capitalism and Democracy: The Missing
    Link. In L. Diamond and M. F. Platter (Eds), Op.cit. p 102).

    As another American political expert R. Duch stresses, "in the
    past the market economy preceded the emergence of democratic
    institutions". (R. Duch. Tolerating Economic Reform: Popular Support
    for Transition to a Free Market in the Former Soviet Union. "American
    Political Science Review", No 87, 1993, p.594). Therefore,
    the occurrent efforts to impose on us a simultaneous transition
    to democracy and to a market are an attempt to alter the model of
    mutual relations between economic and political changes, which have
    developed over centuries, and which constitute an experiment without
    historical precedent.

    History has shown that a democratic regime remains stable only if a
    general electoral law emerges along with the achievement of a certain
    level of per capita GDP. At this level the majority of the country's
    population is sufficiently well-off to be able to take responsible
    decisions and to neutralize the effect of the lumpen proletarians who
    receive ballot papers. Attempts to introduce a general electoral law
    at lower levels of development lead either to its rapid abolition
    or to its turning into a meaningless procedure, and at a level of
    development at approximately three times higher than this the switch
    to a democratic system is simply inevitable.

    It is precisely the level of economic development that largely
    determines the formation of political institutions preferable for
    a country. The optimum political regime for stable economic growth
    depends on the level of its economic development. Countries with
    a higher level of development may tackle the tasks of adapting to
    post-industrial challenges only if they have sufficiently developed
    institutions of a contemporary democratic society.

    The majority of the east Asian countries, who originally carried out
    economic reforms and only then began political ones, have travelled
    a similar path. In essence, political changes have more often become
    an irreversible aspect of a developing economic system, as happened
    in Singapore, Indonesia or Malaysia. For example, in Mexico, which
    tried 20 years to free itself, real progress was only made once the
    national per capita income reached 9,000 dollars. This threshold showed
    the irreversible nature of the process of democratisation and lifted
    Mexico into the number of countries with a consolidated democracy.

    In Turkey democratic changes became successful after the stabilization
    of the economic situation, a reduction in inflation and the beginning
    of a growth in the well-being of society. In a short period of time
    the Turkish political establishment achieved a growth in GDP of almost
    6,500 US dollars per capita, which testifies to the stable and gradual
    growth in the Turkish economy.

    The democratisation of the last decade is closely linked with economic
    growth which creates real and lasting preconditions for effective
    transformation, although this idea should in no way be interpreted
    literally to imply that "the rich are democratic".

    Economic growth and democratisation

    Economic growth and democratisation depend on one another with
    economic factors playing the definitive role. Wealth and opportunity,
    provided not by nature or the minerals under the earth, but acquired
    as a result of the transition from a feudal society to a capitalist,
    and later from an industrial to a post-industrial society, at the
    same time transforming the priority of industry into an imperative of
    the services sphere, enable one to speak about a real and consistent
    transition to a path of market development. Such development, as the
    experience of the West and Japan has shown, is the more effective.

    States that possess large supplies of minerals and who use these
    opportunities exclusively for the purpose of enriching the political
    and financial elite, often remain underdeveloped, their people
    uneducated and their specialists unqualified.

    By attracting "brains" from outside, a consumer psychology of "western
    intellectuals" is formed in these states, whereas the education system
    remains at a low, and society at a primitive level.

    As President Ilham Aliyev points out: "In countries where democracy has
    become developed, there is also economic development. Where democracy
    has not been developed, [economic] development has been slow. In
    this question no natural resources, oil or gas play a major role,
    these are temporary factors". (From President Ilham Aliyev's speech
    at the opening of Heydar Aliyev Park and at a meeting with the people
    of Yardimli District, 9 September 2005).

    In this context the editor of the respected American magazine Foreign
    Affairs, Farid Zakariya, says with every justification: "Why does
    wealth encourage freedom? Let us recall examples from European history:
    the process of economic development usually leads to the emergence of
    two elements which have decisive importance for the success of liberal
    democracy. First, it gives an opportunity to key segments of society,
    especially private business and the bourgeoisie as a whole to acquire
    strength and independence from the state.

    Second, in dealing with social groups of this nature, the state becomes
    less predatory and capricious; it is more and more orientated towards
    observing certain rules and the needs of society, at least on the
    requirements of its elite". (see F. Zakariya: The future of freedom:
    non-liberal democracy in the USA and abroad, p 67).

    One possible reason for the stability of democracy in the
    wealthy countries, put forward by the sociologist Seymour Martin
    Lipset, is that through various social mechanisms wealth allows the
    exacerbation of the conflicts of distribution to be reduced. Initially,
    prosperity and the true distribution of financial resources create
    the preconditions for economic growth, thus contributing towards the
    recognition of freedom by the individual and the formation of a new
    mass consciousness. The strength of such a thesis is confirmed also
    by historical experience.

    Alexander Hamilton once wrote: "So long as property remains roughly
    equally divided and a considerable proportion of information permeates
    through to society, in voting there will be a tendency to pay tribute
    to the services of even the most obscure people. With the growth in
    wealth and its concentration in the hands of the minority and with
    society's increasing desire for luxury, do-gooders will more and more
    be seen merely as a happy addition to material values". (see Bruce
    (?Mayerhof): The Faces of Democracy, page 60) Hamilton was sure that
    a concentration of economic and political power was inevitable.

    Seymour Martin Lipset holds a similar view, drawing this conclusion
    in 1959: "The richer a nation gets, the greater its chances of a
    stable democracy."

    If one looks at history and the modern development of China, then one
    can clearly trace that at the beginning of the 1990s it initiated a
    number of economic reforms believing that they would lead to capitalism
    "as in the West". And despite the fact that some of them failed,
    nevertheless in China they realized that the county had to be rebuilt,
    starting with the economy and moving on to political modernization
    and democratic transformation.

    Such a convergence allows one to speak about the possibility of the
    implementation of political changes which are the logical continuation
    of economic reforms. The essence of this whole process boils down
    to the liberalization of all spheres of human activity, a change in
    socio-cultural archetypes and the subsequent consolidation of the
    democratic regime. Here also lies the central thesis of modernization
    which "consists of economic growth giving rise to parallel, and to a
    certain extent predictable changes in cultural, public and political
    life". (see Theory and Practice of Democracy, page 143).

    One of the leading economists and political thinkers of the 20th
    century, Friedrich August von Hayek, writes in his book "The Road
    to Serfdom": "Apart from the notorious 'economic freedom', economic
    security is also quite justifiably described as a necessary condition
    for true freedom. In a certain sense this is true. An independent
    intellect or a strong character are rarely found among people who
    are not confident of being able to feed themselves." (F. A. Hayek,
    "The Road to Serfdom", Moscow, 2005, page 129)

    In conditions of globalization and intensive expansion of the "third
    democratic wave", such a strategy of social changes presents itself as
    something obvious, because the increasing financial inter-connection
    between continents calls forth a rejection of political insularity and
    the desire to become the member of a club of democratic states. It
    is precisely taking into account the specific nature of a country
    or region in the post-authoritarian transition that determines the
    preferences given to the strategy of "economy before politics".

    These conditions create a basis for the liberalization and formation
    of a civic society in regions where there have been transformations,
    particularly in Azerbaijan. That is precisely why civic society forms
    the only foundation for political democracy, without which the latter
    is simply impossible or ineffective. It was precisely this thesis
    that in 2003 was of paramount importance to Ilham Aliyev's first term
    as president.

    >From stability to modernization

    "The idea appears not as an accidental creation of human insight, but
    is a natural precondition for the modern condition of human society".

    (Alexis de Tocqueville, 1805-1859 French sociologist, historian
    and politician)

    In the course of recent years the main guideline of the
    socio-political development of the state has been directed exclusively
    towards forming a stable system of democratic institutions and
    traditions. Democratization as such is a determining factor of the
    strategy of national development and is an important component of
    coexistence within the framework of a unified society.

    In the conditions of a "third democratic wave", all kinds of
    discussions around government by the people become even more
    topical and fundamental because, on the one hand, they determine
    the possibility of the sovereign development of the national state,
    and on the other they create a bridgehead for "beacons of freedom"
    for the export of the personal vision of various democratic concepts
    to countries of "post-authoritarian transition".

    Often such an export occurs by means of replacing different national
    characteristics or without taking account of the real opportunities
    for building democracy in a certain corner of the globe, i.e. without
    comprehending the real results of institutional, behavioural and
    socio-psychological changes the main indicators of society's readiness
    for the transition to democracy. At times this approach brings forth
    depreciating effects of a global nature, which in the long run leads
    to the emergence of such theories of global chaos, as a "clash of
    civilizations". Democracy as such more often comes out as a factor
    of new geopolitical, or it would be more accurate and precise to say,
    geo-economic expansion.

    However, before embarking on any discussions, one should decide on
    the very understanding of "democracy", after all one frequently hears
    overtones of the past which are very familiar to our generation. We
    often speak about democracy, more and more rarely thinking about the
    reality of its essence, although the basis for such discussions is very
    firm and has the right to exist. Our main political-ideological task is
    the development of the country as a free and democratic state. But one
    needs to understand that in Azerbaijan there are objectively complex
    processes occurring which more and more are becoming the subject of
    discussion on the part of different individuals and organizations. Most
    of all these discussions are about democracy, freedom of speech and
    the press and the concept of "freedom" as a whole.

    We are often accused of being unaccustomed to freedom, and that we
    constantly need to look around us. However, one should draw a line
    between democratic transformation and the geopolitical influence of
    the West. After all, often, when we consider democracy exclusively as
    a form of representation and government by the people, we do not take
    into consideration the ideas and tasks of those who hold these views.

    Democracy has long since ceased to be exclusively a form of the
    representation of the majority, for often we are becoming witnesses of
    how an exclusive minority is dictating the rules and this argument is
    gaining support. Often we are seeing that the main foreign political
    tasks are being carried out by means of democracy and an agenda is
    being shaped in this or that part of the world.

    These factors no longer come as a surprise when in societies to
    whom historically democratic traditions and institutions have been
    alien, new standards of behaviour are formed without taking account
    of the factors of national-historic, cultural and socio-political
    distinctiveness and a change in the public conscience. Even in
    conditions where progress acquires an innovative nature, i.e. when
    ideas, technologies and knowledge change more quickly than it takes
    one generation to take the place of another, such sharp "political
    body action" causes a shift in the centre of gravity of the public
    conscience to a plane of radical rejections.

    At the end of the 21st century democracy is being turned into
    a dangerous geopolitical weapon capable in a very short time of
    causing not only a change of regime, but also of contributing to an
    escalation of tension, as we have already seen in Iraq, Afghanistan,
    Kosovo, and so on.

    Some champions of democracy, clearly, rarely think about the experience
    of history, although the well-known German economist of the 19th
    century, Friedrich von List, noted that with the clash between a
    more developed, industrial society and a less developed society,
    a pre-industrialist or fairly industrialist, the following happens:
    In keeping with the position of a liberal economy, if you take a
    country with a developed economy and integrate it with a country with
    an undeveloped economy, then the level of development and modernization
    will be distributed approximately equally.

    >From the point of view of Friedrich von List's economic school,
    which is backed up by history, there will be a greater development
    of the sector which was in a more developed state and an even greater
    impoverishment and degradation of the "backward" economic system. In
    other words, the direct contact between the more modernized system of
    economy and a less modernized one does not lead to their equalization
    on the principle of communicating vessels, but to a situation where
    the more modernized and wealthier part becomes even more wealthy
    and the less developed part even poorer, because a disproportionate
    development of the economic sector occurs in this poor zone, it becomes
    a primary appendage and, in point of fact, you have colonization.

    The "new economy"

    In the context of the situation of postmodernism and globalization,
    this principle is repeated, but today we find ourselves in a different
    situation. There exists a western ultra-liberal economy, developed
    at the post-modern level, which turns with its methodology to other
    countries, offering to develop and post-modernize these countries. This
    "new economy" presents itself as an objective and as a definite
    instrument for an economic breakthrough, and for the transition of
    countries from an industrial to a post-industrial state. And here a
    situation arises that is absolutely symmetrical to that model which
    existed in the 19th century and was analysed by Friedrich von List.

    But whereas yesterday it was the countries with an economy that was
    predominately pre-modern that were an object of colonization, today
    the industrially developed countries themselves are, in fact, becoming
    nothing more than the object of exploitation of these post-modernist
    systems. Production is being transferred there (as, for example,
    to the zone of the Pacific community), and not only resources but
    human labour are being exploited and, thus, the same phenomenon of
    colonization emerges, but only in a new, covert form.

    On 4 January 2008, an article was published in the British Guardian
    newspaper by the well-known political observer of the London-based
    Times, Simon Jenkins, in which, despite the existing view on democracy,
    he gives his attitude to the essence of modern democracy.

    He writes: "It seems that democracy today is not in the best of
    health...Democracy has always been imperfect. From the moment the
    concept of 'self-government' lost its inseparable link with the prefix
    'self' i.e. it outgrew the framework of the agora...[ellipsis as
    published] - it has gradually become adapted to various countries and
    peoples. Democratic institutions depend more on the history, culture
    and geography of specific countries than the ideas of Madison, Mill
    and de Tocqueville...[ellipsis as published]

    "With all the tragic nature of the events that have been happening
    over the past week in Pakistan and Kenya, it would have been the
    height of arrogance on the part of the West to demand that the
    whole world followed the same path to people's government that it
    itself has followed for long bloody centuries. It is possible that
    we also consider liberal democracy to be the only 'true faith',
    but this opinion is scarcely shared today by the majority of people
    in Russia or China. Like the citizens of many other countries, they
    place security and well-being above everything else.

    "We are not so holy that we can teach others what state system best
    suits them especially when it comes to the countries whose political
    atmosphere the West itself has polluted with financial aid, debts,
    trade restrictions and border conflicts. It is possible and it
    appears that today democracy in Pakistan and Kenya is suffering from
    an attack of violence, but you know in the West, too, it is confined to
    corruption when compiling party lists, eccentric results in 'primaries'
    and the existence of collegiates of electoral delegates.

    "Today the people of Britain and the USA sharply criticize their
    own constitutions for failing to comply with democratic ideals,
    especially when it comes to accountability of the government and
    constraints restricting the freedom of action of the executive power.

    And the outcome of the [presidential] election in America in 2000
    was generally determined not by the voting of the electorate, but by
    the decision of a body consisting of people appointed by an oligarchy
    (the results of the election were endorsed by the Supreme Court).

    Finally, the American people would scarcely be pleased if observers
    from Ukraine, India and Thailand, who had come to supervise the voting,
    had been based at the Miami Hilton hotel.

    "I personally believe that democracy is the best path to stability
    and the prosperity of society and I hope that other people share my
    opinion as to its advantages...[ellipsis as published]

    "However, the best way to publicize democracy is by example, and not
    interventions or official 'reprobations'. Britain's 'white-collar
    workers' are not so pure that its leaders can give lectures to the
    whole world in a tone reeking of neo-colonialism. It is possible
    that the shortcomings of democracy in other countries are seen as a
    'beam in the eye' compared with our 'speck of dust', but to sort out
    this beam is their own business, and definitely not ours.

    "Pakistan occupies sixth place in the world in size of population.

    The frailty of 'semi-democracy' in this country is caused by the
    upheavals of the recent past and desperate poverty. There are hundreds
    of means of helping it to get through the rough path leading from
    dictatorship to democracy which Britain was fortunate to overcome
    by a 'pleasure step' over two centuries. But at the end of the day
    Pakistan and Kenya will only be stronger if they travel this path by
    themselves. And the last thing they need is a dressing down on the
    telephone by a post-imperial 'nanny'".

    I have deliberately quoted the main points of this article so
    extensively because his findings fully reflect the situation that
    is being created by the West in the countries of the "new democracy"
    under the cloak of democratic terminology.

    Geo-democratic changes

    Naturally, in the conditions of global integration, when not
    only finances can easily and rapidly be moved around, but mutual
    relations between people are shaped under the impact of information and
    communication technology, and feelings, too, are conveyed by electronic
    means (by smileys), it is impossible to speak about autocracy in its
    past meaning. On the other hand, nowadays a national state, especially
    if it is restricted by the laws of geographical determinism and sees
    itself as a geographically important area, is more and more being
    subjected to pressure from outside with the purpose of following
    precisely that model of democracy and a civic society which should,
    in the opinion of importers, form the best government of the people.

    In today's world we are more and more often becoming witness to
    geo-democratic transformations when, with the aim of building a new
    environment of democratic institutions and traditions, the state
    principles in this or that country are being radically revamped.

    The national democratic transition became a derivative of the global
    disturbances on the world political map after the collapse of the
    USSR. However, the internal cataclysms in Azerbaijan, caused by
    the inept rule of a group of romantics, pushed discussions about
    democracy back several years, because the political elite who came
    to power in 1993 had to formulate a stable internal structure of
    society, to avert a regression in the national economy and to ensure
    an appropriate external background for the state's activity.

    As we know, without stability, no talks about democracy and a civic
    society have any value. Without stability and an understanding by
    the people of Aristotle's truth that "a state is created so that the
    people can live in a stable manner", it is difficult to form a public
    awareness directed towards equality of rights and transparency.

    Finally, without a stable political structure it is impossible to
    imagine a stable economic system which is the determining factor of
    a national democratic transition because, as President Ilham Aliyev
    points out: "Economic growth and the democratisation of society are
    the main elements of our policy which are impossible one without the
    other. It is possible to be economically strong, but if there is no
    democracy and no transparency, and if human rights are not protected,
    then you cannot expect success". (from President Ilham Aliyev's speech
    at a meeting of the autumn session of the Parliamentary Assembly of
    the Council of Europe; 29 April 2004).

    Having digressed somewhat from the subject we were discussing, one
    still has to state with regret that discussions about a national
    democratic transition are rarely becoming a factor of popular debate
    in the country. Such indifference to the current and future strategy
    of national development cannot be explained. In conditions when
    from scientific positions the proper place and acceptable model of
    democratic development to meet with current realities in Azerbaijan
    has not been defined, the political establishment often has to try
    to decide both theoretical and practical tasks.

    Although the scope for debate is very broad, it also requires that
    national intellectuals join in the debate in an extremely active way.

    This question has been frequently raised by the head of state who
    believes it is necessary to use the country's scientific potential
    widely to solve these theoretical problems.

    Azerbaijan's new political space

    The main task facing the Azerbaijani political elite in recent years
    has been the formation of a new political space for the country,
    where everyone understands their obligations and rights, where the
    individual recognizes the truth once declared by Jean-Jacques Rousseau
    that one person's rights end where another's begin. In other words,
    as one politician put it, "the extent of the blow from my fist ends
    where the other person's cheek begins".

    Azerbaijan's new political space will be formed in time, because
    such a process is not being sanctioned "by superiors" and is not
    being implemented "to order". In the long term it will identify
    the possibility of inter-action between the authorities and the
    opposition for the benefit of the development of the state and
    society. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the 32nd president of the USA
    (1882-1945) once said: "Whatever the ideology in a country might be,
    its national interests are invariable." It is precisely in this that
    we see the ideal of constructive rivalry, where each player in the
    political process understands that there is only one objective the
    benefit of the country.

    Intolerance, irreconcilability and a rejection of dialogue must be
    replaced by healthy competition, tolerant mutual relations and a desire
    to form an environment of constructive, functional, public debate
    around the present and future state. This thesis was the fundamental
    one when President Ilham Aliyev more than once asked the players in
    the political process to take up a rational position in relation to the
    nationwide projects and initiatives that were being carried out and to
    become part of a dialogue between the authorities and the counter-elite
    with the ultimate aim of forming a stable political playing field.

    It is important to understand that democracy is not just a matter
    of approaching the urn and casting your vote on a day specially set
    aside for this. Democracy is a part of life, a way of thinking and
    a form of inter-action within society between its members. It is a
    process that helps to strengthen and develop states and not to set it
    in regression. We in power clearly understand these truths. We realize
    that the political environment is in need of constant renewal and we
    recognize that we have to move on if our democratic development is
    to be complete and stable. A whole range of urgent measures have been
    carried out in this direction in recent years which allow, on the one
    hand, to form the basis of a future civic society, and on the other,
    to make the national democratic model effective and acceptable to
    Azerbaijani society.

    The foundations for a civic society are being purposefully and
    systematically laid in Azerbaijan today. Here is contained the basic
    context of the forthcoming transition to consolidated democracy. The
    creation in 2007 of the State Foundation of Support non-government
    organization under the Azerbaijani president was an important landmark
    on the path to forming an effective "third sector" in the country,
    independent of outside sponsors, dictating its own rules of the game
    and behaviour, striving to build a diagonal of influence for the
    adoption of political decisions required for grant providers by means
    of the activities of the non-government sector. In Azerbaijan there
    are currently over 3,000 non-government organizations functioning and
    all these things are indicators of the formation of a civic society
    in the country.

    The minister of finances and chairman of the government of tsarist
    Russia, Sergey Witte, wrote: "A state does not so much create as
    replenish, it is the citizens who are the true creators...[ellipsis
    as published] Not to point the way to independence, but to develop
    it and help it in every way." The non-government sector must form an
    open and transparent dialogue between the authorities and society, but
    this is possible only with financial self-sufficiency and transparency
    carried out in the national interests of policy.

    Unfortunately, often those who hide behind the screen of a human
    rights champion or a member of an NGO are carrying out their carefully
    calibrated and formed tasks and objectives outside the country.

    However, they would do well to realize that Azerbaijan is a country
    which chose democracy for itself by the will of its own people.

    Having embarked on this path, we intended, abiding by all democratic
    standards, and taking account of the historical, geopolitical and
    other specifics, to ensure the implementation of the principles of
    freedom and democracy. In conditions of the formation of a stable
    and sovereign statehood, the Azerbaijani people are capable of
    independently determining the speed, timescale and levels of progress
    on the path towards creating a society of consolidated democracy.

    As President Ilham Aliyev notes, we have defined democratic development
    as follows: "The creation and strengthening of a civic society, the
    strengthening of the process of democratisation and the construction
    of a law-based state this is not simply a slogan or an intention,
    it is the main condition for Azerbaijan's all-round development. Our
    experience shows that the path chosen by Azerbaijan is the correct
    one. The parallel conducting of economic, political and social
    reforms develops Azerbaijan in all ways, strengthens stability which
    is so vital to our country and also has a positive influence on the
    socio-political situation". (from President Ilham Aliyev's speech at
    the opening if the autumn session of the Milli Maclis [Azerbaijani
    parliament], on 2 October 2005).

    Opponents of democratisation

    It is quite obvious that Azerbaijan's stable consistent development
    does not please everyone. Many of those who use pseudo-democratic
    language would like to go back to the past: some in order to plunder
    national wealth with impunity, to rob people and the state, others to
    deprive the country of economic and political independence and others
    to realize their own ambitions. We must disappoint those who today
    in and outside the country still harbour hopes of a return to the past.

    Our country stands firmly on positions of adherence to its democratic
    course and development, and despite difficulties and upheavals, we are
    striving to bring the country to the necessary level of development to
    provide three basic factors of the development of Azerbaijani society
    national unity and political sovereignty, economic well-being and
    integrity of spiritual unity and the moral values that bind us.

    In this context I would like to stress quite an important aspect so
    that the debate around national democratisation has a more lasting and
    sound basis. I propose that such declarations are at times important
    because they create an opportunity to make the argument more fruitful
    and effective. In the modern world two concepts pay a key role in the
    theoretical construction of the democratic system in one environment
    or another "the transition to democracy" and "consolidation of the
    democratic system" or "consolidation of democracy". The first process
    leads to "the establishment of a democratic government", the second to
    "the consolidation of democracy" or to "the effective functioning of
    a democratic regime".

    In point of fact, in the first case it is a question of an
    institutional basis of democratic transformation, which assumes the
    creation and functioning of a democratic regime, and the process of
    changing and electing the legislative and executive authorities. In
    the second case we are talking about a consolidation of democracy as
    a socio-political system which assumes a qualitative change in the
    mass conscience and society's total inclusion in the new democratic
    values, traditions and institutions.

    Therefore, in the context of the concepts we have mentioned, the
    occasional pessimistic arguments about the "results" of national
    democratisation seem extremely hasty. It is obvious that such "results"
    of democratisation cannot be accurate, because the political agenda
    is still being defined by the tasks of the first period, when the
    institutional base of the process of national democratisation was due
    to be established. In this context the arguments of those who suggest
    that 16 years is a sufficient period of time for total democratisation
    seem quite groundless. It is well known how long the first stage of
    democratisation turned out to be in some Latin American countries,
    particularly Brazil, where it stretched from the mid 1970s to the
    mid 1990s. In Britain democracy has been established over a period
    of about 200 years.

    Effective legal and political system

    A determining factor of the development of democracy is the creation
    of an effective legal and political system. But the price of the
    development of democratic procedures should not be in conflict with law
    and order, nor with stability which was achieved with such difficulty,
    nor with the stable conducting of an economic course.

    This thesis determines the modern state of a feasible policy which
    is based on the realization that a strong power is the guarantee
    of the durability of the principles of statehood. Hobbs once noted
    that a formal order, which makes possible the joint life of private
    individuals in society, creates a strong state power. Its absence is
    a reason for anarchic tendencies and the collapse of the state.

    The durability of state power is in many ways determined by the
    authorities' ability to protect the interests of different sections
    of society, to maintain a balance between social forces and ensure the
    progressive development of civilian, democratic and self-administrative
    trends of human contact. If state power ceases to work for society
    and restricts its activity to merely serving individual groups,
    and its own apparatus, it is helping to alienate the citizens from
    the state and its institutions, and creates conditions for conflict
    between society and the authorities. The efforts of the president are
    directed towards solving these tasks, which enables one to speak about
    a desire to perfect in Azerbaijan the opportunity for active civilian
    participation and a dialogue between society and the authorities,
    i.e. to create a stable and strong power.

    A significant aspect of the formation of a stable political system
    in the country is the qualitative transformation of political culture.

    It comes out as a factor for providing state sovereignty and an
    element of building an effective model of mutual relations between
    the authorities and the counter-elite in the country, and ensures the
    participation of all players in the political process and accordingly
    creates an opportunity for the consistent development of political
    and public institutions. Meanwhile, the lack of proper cultural
    orientation and the blind following of foreign examples inevitably lead
    to a nation losing its own identity. Political culture must identify
    the exclusively national factor of development and come out as the
    major link in inter-political debate, ensuring the establishment of
    a full-fledged political dialogue in the country.

    Our political culture must embody the nation's readiness for innovative
    breakthroughs and new technological achievements.

    President's thesis

    President Ilham Aliyev's activities in recent years have contributed
    to a change in the vector of development of the national political
    environment. The thesis about the need for economic and political
    stabilization in the country has gradually grown into the creation
    and development of structures of a civic society. Parties and other
    political organizations, in view of the low social order for their
    existence and functioning, have started to cohabit in society or to
    latently cancel themselves out. Associations, unions and blocs have
    become a frontal part of the process which hides a total weakness of
    opposition political organizations which are incapable of competing
    in the struggle for power.

    In such an inner-political structure the main aspect of President Ilham
    Aliyev's political concept is already being built on his main thesis
    "from stability to development", which is identified by a desire to
    conclude in the near future the process of democratic transformation
    and to begin the formation of structures and institutions of a
    civic society. So it is quite obvious that the recognition of
    liberal-democratic models at a rhetorical level does not promise
    success. The ability of politics to adjust is determined in the desire
    of these models to become a part of social development.

    At the same time, in trying to break away from hybrid forms, which
    emerge during transformations, it is necessary to be able to build
    a democratic basis based on the modernization of contemporary life.

    It (modernization) determines the possibility of establishing
    a full-fledged democratic society. In recent years the policy of
    transformations which is being implemented in Azerbaijan has created
    a stable foundation for the retransformation of socio-cultural
    models. Henceforth democracy and the segments accompanying it are not
    perceived by society as something alien and difficult to digest. This
    is the main aspect of the retransformation of the mass conscience,
    and as such it makes substantial adjustments to our national
    self-awareness. Democracy sets itself up not only in the form of
    freedom of the individual, but also creates a foundation for improving
    the notional apparatus of "freedom" and ensuring the retransformation
    of archetypes and the most important factors of national identity.

    In recent years a clear basis of national democratisation has been
    formed in the country which identifies with the understanding by
    the power elite of the following factors of political, economic and
    socio-cultural activity:

    (i) the rights and freedoms of the individual are an important
    and priority link in the horizontal of mutual relations between
    state and society. At the same time, the state's course towards
    modernization, which is aimed at building a transparent and democratic
    regime, embodies a system of values where the citizen is seen in
    a qualitatively new aspect and the provision of his rights is an
    imperative of modern democratic development. The basis of this
    thesis is this quote from President Ilham Aliyev: "We are building
    a society which will ensure the supremacy of the law, a high level
    of transparency and each person will live in conditions of peace and
    calm and take advantage of all freedoms". (from President Aliyev's
    interview with a correspondent of the Nikkei newspaper (Nihon Keizai
    Shimbun", 13 June 2007);

    (ii) a democratic course is the main vector of the development of
    Azerbaijani statehood and a determining factor of the strategy of
    national development;

    (iii) democracy, like subsequent liberalization, which offers maximum
    freedom to the citizen, defines the essence of the transformation in
    the convergence of the idea of freedom and the concept of effective
    statehood. At the same time by democracy is understood a form
    of authority, and from this point of view it presents itself as a
    teaching of the legitimisation of the power of the majority.

    Liberalism, on the other hand, assumes limits of power;

    (iv) the preconditions of democratisation and subsequent liberalization
    in the country are laid down in the outcome of substantial economic
    changes which ensure the implementation of a system of ECONOMIC
    MODERNIZATION + STAGE-BY-STAGE DEMOCRATIZATION=THE START OF A PROCESS
    OF THE FORMATION OF A CIVIC SOCIETY [capitalized as published]. This
    is a true embodiment of the policy of the transformation period,
    which is aimed at the formation of a new political space and an
    economic model, consistent with the requirements of the contemporary
    world order. This thesis is backed up by the president's quote that
    "macroeconomic indices in Azerbaijan are at the lowest level, without
    parallel in the world". (Ilham Aliyev's speech at a session of the
    cabinet on 22 October 2007). The development of the economy as a whole
    is leading the country to a factor of a more stable democratic system;

    (v) a civic society in the country will be formed along with the
    implementation of the paradigm THE MODERNIZATION OF THE ECONOMY, THE
    DEMOCRATIZATION OF PUBLIC LIFE, THE SYSTEMIC LIBERALIZATION OF NATIONAL
    SPACE [capitalized as published]. As Ilham Aliyev notes: "We believe
    that the future of our region will depend on how successfully our
    society is modernized. In other words, the development of democratic
    reforms and the implementation of economic reforms will depend on our
    activity in the policy of the modernization of the political system
    and our society. (from President Aliyev's speech at the opening of
    the first extended session of the international investment forum
    "An extraordinary round-table meeting on Ukraine", 16 June, 2005);

    (vi) the basis of democratic transformation and the building of
    a civic society in the country rests on an understanding of the
    dichotomy TOTAL FREEDOM=STRONG POWER [capitalized as published],
    which excludes anarchic tyranny and disorder, and also contributes
    to concluding the process of the construction of effective statehood.

    Summing up this thesis, President Ilham Aliyev stresses: "Our aim is
    to build a modern, strong state, to create an economically strong
    state and the building of a society of social prosperity and to
    solve all the problems that concern people and the formation of a
    free society so that people can live better, in happiness and with a
    sense of well-being". (from President Aliyev's speech at the opening
    of the Qazax Olympic sports complex, 30 May 2007);

    (vii) globalization, which in the 21st century presents itself as the
    main aspect of the modern development of mankind, exerts considerable
    influence on the formation of the inner-political environment. The
    westernisation introduced by global tendencies is shifting the accents
    of behavioural norms and stereotypes, eroding the concepts of the
    sovereignty of a national state. That is why an important element
    in protecting a stable and effective state system is the ability to
    strike a balance between the imported and autogenous factors of the
    development of society. "The endorsement of social justice and the
    protection of our national-spiritual values," the president reminds us,
    "are of vital importance for the country", (President Aliyev's speech
    in Qobustan District, 23 October 2007).

    Priority must be based on local socio-cultural models as a basis of
    sovereign development taking into account the positive aspects of
    the western (westernising) world. The building of a civic society in
    Azerbaijan cannot be carried out by copying western models. Taking
    into consideration socio-cultural characteristics, local political
    and economic factors, and the archetypes of the national "me" will
    contribute towards certain autogenous transformations and develop
    democratic institutions and traditions. This idea fully sits with
    the thesis expressed by the president: "We must not blindly copy
    in Azerbaijan everything we see abroad. There are some things there
    which will be of no benefit to us. But we must bring in and make use
    of everything there that is positive." (from President Aliyev's speech
    at a session of the cabinet on 22 October 2007)

    The process of democratisation in Azerbaijan has already travelled
    a definite path: Twelve years have passed since 1995, when the
    general anarchy and political tyranny ended and the economic and
    political reforms began. In 1995, 20 years after the overthrow of
    dictatorship, Spain became a full-fledged and stable democracy. In
    recent years Azerbaijan has been emerging from a protracted period
    of post-revolutionary reaction, the tasks of which it has already
    solved. We have reached the point where the authorities are ruling
    by new methods.

    "Interesting battles" ahead

    OCTOBER 2008: A STRONG STATE, A MODERNIZED ECONOMY AND FREE CITIZENS
    [capitalized as published]

    2008 is an important period for adopting political decisions when
    each of the players in the political process will rejoice in their
    subject changes. From a retrospective position it is clear that we
    can expect interesting political battles from the models of previous
    elections. At the same time, there is no doubt that the authorities
    are prepared to go to the ballot box with a substantial supply of new
    political, economic and social proposals. We will try to reveal the
    essence of what we can expect by October 2008 and what our proposals
    are so that the country's citizens can make the correct and rational
    choice in favour of continuity of policy and the "new course".

    The main objective which President Ilham Aliyev has achieved,
    supported by the foundation of statehood laid down by Heydar Aliyev,
    was the further strengthening and development of national statehood.

    The task was to bring back the former economic strength and political
    stability, in the framework of the new world order to ensure the
    country's active participation in regional and global processes, to
    switch from a defensive foreign political concept to an offensive one
    and to "pierce" the indifference of international organizations towards
    a number of issues and problems that were important for the country.

    In addition, it was necessary to carry out a whole range of tasks:
    to begin the intensive modernization of the economy; to provide jobs
    for 600,000 people; to lay the foundation for the formation of a
    middle class and, having ensured consistent development, to begin
    the liberalization of the national economy and to reduce the level
    of poverty in the country as much as possible.

    But this was not all: it was necessary to invest in the country's
    intellectual future and create a basis for forming an intellectual
    medium by means of training 15,000 young people abroad; by a system of
    mortgage crediting to create conditions for solving housing problems
    for young people; to build more than 1,200 schools; with the support
    of young, to create an effective mechanism for the formation in the
    country of a democratic regime and a civic society.

    In regional and international arenas the task is to step up efforts to
    solve the Karabakh problem; to change the nature of foreign political
    activity and the constant lobbying of the country's interests in
    uniting the diaspora around nationwide tasks. In the last four years
    there has been a substantial improvement in the defence capability
    of the national army, whose budget in 2008 is 1.2bn dollars. Even
    quite recently one would often hear critical attacks regarding the
    possibility of a tenfold increase in the country's budget, but the
    current realities have shown the soundness of the promises given by
    the president in 2003.

    Test of maturity

    Today Azerbaijan is approaching a new stage in its test of maturity.

    In recent years the face not only of the metropolis but also of the
    periphery has seriously changed.

    Public awareness is latently transforming the post-modernist trends
    which will subsequently determine the strategy of tomorrow. However,
    Ilham Aliyev's domestic and foreign policy activities are still to
    be assessed seriously and impartially. At the moment this is not
    difficult, although proper analysis is at times being obstructed by
    critical attacks. But the agenda which President Ilham Aliyev will
    be working in the next five years is already clear. Without claiming
    to be a precise and final prognosis, it is possible to reduce it to
    seven basic tasks in general terms.

    First, a stable economic system inevitably leads to greater
    democratisation of public awareness. The implementation of a broad
    range of economic measures in the course of the last four years or
    so has created an opportunity for an increase in people's financial
    solvency, an increase in the financial opportunities of the individual,
    and that means this will inevitably lead to a change in behavioural
    stereotypes among members of society because, as J.-J.Rousseau wrote,
    "equality, which makes people independent of one another, develops
    in them a habit and a tendency to be guided in their private life
    only by their own desires and will. That complete independence, which
    they constantly use both in relations with their equals and in their
    private life...shapes in them a concept of political freedom and an
    adherence to it". (All politics: an anthology. Moscow, 2006, p 130).

    Model of future economic development

    The model of economic development in consequence, shaped at this stage,
    will be: (i) to transform Azerbaijani society into a channel of the
    formation of a new political environment in which the authorities
    and the opposition co-exist in the context of constructive rivalry;
    (ii) to assist in the completion of the stage of forming the basis of
    a civic society; (iii) to lead public awareness to an environment of
    post-industrial values, which will help to change the place of the
    individual in society, the recognized understanding of the concept
    of a "free citizen" and the modification of the content of politics
    in Azerbaijan.

    Second, the country's economic development in recent years has
    pursued the aim of consolidating the state's role as regional leader
    in the South Caucasus. Accordingly, Azerbaijan's claims to the leading
    role in the region require the formation of a system of stable union
    relations. It is common knowledge that the best ally is a remunerative
    partner. Accordingly, an alliance means investment in the future,
    and as a rule this is a cost-plus factor, which does not bring an
    immediate return, but is a true path towards forming a policy of
    strategic and long-term goodneighbourly relations.

    In continuing the policy which was carried out by President Ilham
    Aliyev in relation to a whole number of countries, in the coming
    years the vector of the strategy of foreign political activity will
    most likely be directed also towards the East, because it is generally
    accepted that the Asia-Pacific region will be the area where the main
    political events of the 21st century will unfold. At the same time,
    Azerbaijan is capable of being not just a factor of Europe's energy
    security, but also becoming an important aspect of the formation of
    the security architecture in the East.

    Third. It is natural that at the current stage the historic process of
    the liberalization of the economy has acquired the nature of a global
    world trend embracing more and more countries. Scope is opening up
    for the activity of mechanisms of market regulation. The interference
    of states in the economy and its administrative forms, as well as in
    forms of direct state regulation, is being reduced. The main function
    of a state is becoming the creation and maintenance of a competitive
    environment by means of adopting economic and civil legislation,
    simplifying and cheapening the creation of new private enterprises
    and supporting medium-size and small businesses.

    The process of the liberalization of the national economy is closely
    linked with its level of growth. Along with economic growth and changes
    in the basic factors of the formation of a stable economic system
    there will occur an increase in transparency and the implementation
    of a strategy of inter-economic liberalization, to which apply the
    privatisation of state enterprises and the expansion of the sphere
    of freely established prices and incomes, interest rates and credit
    conditions, which are taking place within the framework of national
    economies, and also, in particular, a strengthening of foreign
    economic liberalization. The latter will help to expand the unhindered
    international movement of goods and services, capital and information.

    At the same time, this aspect will be an important factor in the
    country's entry into the WTO, because the liberalization of world
    trade with goods and services is being shown by the tendency to lift
    customs barriers and restrictions in trade between countries.

    A TABLE: COUNTRIES WITH A TRANSITIONAL ECONOMY BY CATEGORIES DEPENDING
    ON THE ORIGINAL STRATEGY OF REFORMS [capitalized as published]

    Consistent strategy of Progressive start/ Interrupted Gradual Limited

    " big explosion" stable progress "big explosion" Reforms Reforms

    Estonia_ Hungary_Albania Azerbaijan Belarus

    Latvia_ Slovenia_Bulgaria_Armenia Uzbekistan

    Lithuania_ Croatia Macedonia Georgia Turkmenistan

    Czech Republic Kyrgyzstan Kazakhstan

    Poland_ Russia Ukraine

    Slovakia*_Tajikistan

    Romania

    *In Slovakia the accelerated economic reforms took place in 1990-1992
    when it entered the Czechoslovak Federation.

    Fourth, in recent years a space has developed in the country for
    forming a national idea which is based on the concepts of statehood
    set out by Heydar Aliyev and will be based on the modernization
    course of present-day Azerbaijan. It was Cicero who once said: "If
    one looks at everything from the point of view of wisdom and passion,
    then of all social relations for each of us the most important and the
    most dear are our relations with the state. Our parents, our children,
    our relatives and our close friends are dear to us, but our Fatherland
    alone has embraced all the affections of all people."

    (Cicero. On old age, On friendship, On duties. Moscow, 1975).

    In this context, the pivotal aspect of a national idea is the primacy
    of the state as the most important concept in the life of each
    Azerbaijani. It is precisely Azerbaijan and being an Azerbaijani that
    are the refraction of the socio-political, moral-spiritual and sacred
    values formed by the Azerbaijani people over the centuries of history,
    language, culture and religion as a cultural factor. These aspects
    national history, the Azerbaijani language, the gift to traditions
    and the distinctive nature of our culture, as well as religious
    tolerance form the present and future of Azerbaijani statehood as a
    sovereign subject of world politics, as a separate unit in the epoch
    of global integration.

    All this helps to unite politics and culture, helping to spiritualise
    and aestheticize politics, which is turning more and more into
    a game of sordid passions, to impart it with deep meaning. Such a
    national idea will help to recreate national unity and unite natural
    contradictions. "A nation implies common values, and nationalism the
    creation of the significance of these values." (A.Moeller, The Third
    Reich, Hamburg, 1935).

    Political sovereignty

    Fifth, as recent years have shown, the president's task consists of
    ensuring political sovereignty and stable economic prosperity by means
    of an intellectual breakthrough in national development. In conditions
    of the internationalisation of education and global competition it is
    extremely important to create the necessary conditions for a constant
    improvement in the intellectual level and the emergence of a priority
    of the sphere of services. In a world where information-communicational
    and nanotechnologies dictate the agenda, it is important to Azerbaijan
    to form the necessary basis for participation in this race.

    Without the necessary level of education and science it will be
    difficult for us to think about the prospects of national development
    and about the stable and consistent development of Azerbaijani
    statehood. It is evident today that in the coming years Ilham Aliyev's
    main task will lie precisely in the renewal and expansion of the
    nation's intellectual basis, which will determine the strategy of
    development for the future.

    Sixth, in order to confirm the stated positions as an independent
    centre of regional policy active diplomacy is needed in tackling
    local tasks and active involvement in global problems. Naturally,
    in the last decade and a half the West has become more egocentric
    and has difficulty comprehending a different point of view. But
    the general crisis of policy and diplomacy requires a search for
    constructive proposals and the participation of all the components
    of world politics in the processes of worldwide importance. The main
    advantage of a multi-vector concept is the broad perspectives which
    create a bridgehead so that each side is able to display initiative.

    Seventh, the influence of the state on regional processes is closely
    linked with the strengthening and perfection of the country's defence
    capability. A strong army is precisely what is capable of exerting
    a systemic influence on all of Azerbaijan's foreign policy. The
    strengthening of the country's positions in the region, as well
    as solving the Karabakh conflict will be possible also given the
    all-round development of the national military-industrial complex.

    There should be no doubt that the coming years will be devoted to
    resolving this task.

    All that must be done in the next five years can be defined as having
    a firm position and a flexible approach. Heydar Aliyev at one time
    carried out a main function - he created and endorsed statehood.

    Ilham Aliyev in his first presidential term fulfilled the main work in
    advancing the country's geo-economic factor. One may say with every
    confidence that in the future he will implement to the full a range
    of measures aimed at the country's total modernization.

    I concluded one of my articles published a few years ago with a quote
    from Winston Churchill, a politician with great and restless strength
    and an ability to be ahead of history and to predict its global
    turns. Without altering tradition, I would like to close this article
    with a quote from Sir Winston's speech at Fulton (Missouri in 1946).

    The choice of the Fulton speech is not by accident. It is believed to
    be Churchill's most important and vivid speech, where for the first
    time such expressions as the "muscles of war" and "special relations"
    were heard. It touched for the first time on that same "iron curtain"
    which protected the West from the threat of communism.

    Naturally, in an age of the transience and acceleration of history,
    when the processes of decades of the past today take up only two-three
    years, there can be no talk of curtains, and there is no point,
    because it does not answer our priority objectives and national
    interests. However, our national development and the processes
    of a global nature that surround us force us to think more often
    about sovereignty and national spirit. Both these factors help us to
    develop and to progress, they inspire our aim for innovation and our
    initiatives and they define the essence of how the Azerbaijani people
    will live in the future.

    Today we are happy that we have a sovereign national state and that we
    have the opportunity to determine a national strategy of development,
    taking into consideration our own vision of the path, and each of us
    is proud that he is Azerbaijani. All this together is concordant with
    what I would like to cite for each of us as a reminder of our mission
    in this world: "Looking around us, we must be concerned not only about
    doing our duty before mankind, but also that we do not fall below the
    level we have reached...New, bright prospects and opportunities are
    opening up. If we reject them, or ignore them, or do not use them in
    full measure, we will invite the condemnation of our descendants for
    a long time. It is necessary that consistency of thought, persistence
    in the achievement of goals and dignified simplicity in decisions
    have determined and directed our policy...[ellipsis as published]
    We have an obligation to cope with this difficult task and I have no
    doubt that we will succeed."
Working...
X