Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: Dink Family Lawyer Questions Fairness Of Trial

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: Dink Family Lawyer Questions Fairness Of Trial

    DINK FAMILY LAWYER QUESTIONS FAIRNESS OF TRIAL
    Yonca Poyraz Doðan

    Today's Zaman
    Feb 13 2008
    Turkey

    Erdal Doðan, a lawyer representing the family of slain Turkish-Armenian
    journalist Hrant Dink, has said the murder has not been properly
    investigated, noting that some of the evidence has been hidden or
    destroyed.

    "During the preparations for trial, the prosecutor's office
    demanded some information that has not been provided, and during the
    investigation process, the court's demands from security personnel
    and institutions have not been fulfilled. If such information is
    being withheld, the people behind this crime cannot be revealed,
    so we can't talk about a just trial process," Doðan said yesterday,
    following the third hearing on Monday in the trial of defendants
    accused of assassinating Dink, who was killed in January of last year
    by an ultranationalist youth for allegedly insulting Turkishness.

    Referring to the series of police lapses in the handling of the Dink
    case and official attempts to protect those who plotted the crime as
    reported by the press previously, Doðan said:

    "In the report related to how the defendants had been organized
    to commit the crime, head of police intelligence Ramazan Akyurek
    intervened in the case by calling Yasin Hayal and others planning
    the murder merely a group of friends who came together because he
    said Dink had insulted Turkishness. Plus he obstructed justice by
    ordering the destruction of a 49-page document related to one of the
    defendants, Erhan Tuncel. The trial cannot proceed in a healthy manner
    because documents containing information on more than 6,000 telephone
    calls made by some of the defendants have been destroyed by security
    officials in Trabzon [where several suspects who are being tried for
    instigating the crime are from]."

    Dink was gunned down in broad daylight on Jan. 19 in front of
    the headquarters of bilingual Armenian weekly Agos, where he was
    editor-in-chief. Following Dink's murder, many reports suggested that
    the police were tipped off about the planned assassination more than
    once prior to his execution yet failed to prevent it.

    In addition, links have emerged among members of the security forces
    in Trabzon, where the killing was planned, in Ýstanbul where it was
    executed and in Ankara, where the intelligence was gathered.

    A total of 19 suspects, including Dink's suspected killer, 17-year-old
    O.S., and an ultranationalist youth charged with planning the crime,
    went on trial for organizing the murder at the 14th High Criminal
    Court in the Beþiktaþ district of Ýstanbul.

    The trial is being held behind closed doors because O.S. is a minor.

    Up to 50 lawyers tried to attend Monday's hearing, though only 17
    were allowed into the courthouse. Security was tight, with police in
    riot gear stationed at the courthouse entrance.

    One of the lawyers of the Dink family, Fikret Ýlkiz, demanded a bone
    analysis test to determine O.S.' real age again because they objected
    to the results of the previous tests. However, the prosecutor made
    an objection to this.

    At Monday's hearing, which lasted approximately seven hours, defendants
    O.S., Hayal and Tuncay Uzundal, who have been in police custody,
    were questioned by their own lawyers and the lawyers of the Dink
    family, while Tuncel refused to answer the questions of the Dink
    family lawyers.

    The attorneys for the defense requested the release of the eight
    defendants from police custody but this was to no avail.

    The questioning will continue on Feb. 25, with many in the country
    following the case closely.

    All sessions were recorded by cameras set up in the courtroom for
    the first time in Turkish judicial history. The Ýstanbul Public
    Prosecutor's Office ordered cameras to be installed in the courtroom
    following the Dink family's request of audiovisual recording after
    their lawyers had accused security officers of covering up intelligence
    and evidence after the second hearing of the trial, which resumed in
    early October 2007.

    The second hearing of suspects was held on Oct. 1, 2007, when
    O.S. expressed "regret" for the killing in his testimony.

    "I was forced to do this job. I shot Dink out of fear without even
    understanding how it happened. I was at my uncle's place when I came
    back to my senses. I could not sleep the entire night. I regret it;
    I didn't know he had a family. I wouldn't have done it if I had known,"
    he said in his testimony.

    Malatya case lawyer demands protection

    Meanwhile, the lawyer for three murdered Christian victims at the
    Zirve Publishing House in the southeastern province of Malatya demanded
    protection, saying that he fears for his life.

    Attorney Orhan Kemal Cengiz applied to the Ankara Prosecutor's Office
    last week for protection after receiving suspicious letters and calls.

    "I was active in preparations for the formation of a group of experts
    to investigate the crime. I have become the target of some groups
    that have been uncomfortable because the victims have been strongly
    represented," he reportedly wrote in his petition.

    Last April, three Protestants -- two Turks and a German -- had their
    throats slit at a Bible publishing house.

    --Boundary_(ID_H8+TC82GGyUtiiF2bp/D2A)--
Working...
X