Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No right to lose?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • No right to lose?

    What the Papers Say (Russia)
    February 22, 2008 Friday


    NO RIGHT TO LOSE?

    by Boris Navasardjan



    HIGHLIGHT: SERJ SARKISJAN IS ABOUT TO BECOME PRESIDENT, LEVON
    TER-PETROSJAN PROMISES "SURPRISES"; Whatever Ter-Petrosjan is
    planning, his time has nearly run out.



    Everybody in Armenia wondered before the election on January 19 to
    what extent the correlation of forces and interests that had taken
    shape under Robert Kocharjan would be spared changes.

    These doubts and apprehensions played their part, and the outcome of
    the election was never a foregone conclusion. Levon Ter-Petrosjan's
    participation in the election became a wild card in the deck. A
    substantial part of the establishment views Ter-Petrosjan, the first
    president of sovereign Armenia, as a man they know and a man who
    could be trusted to do right (or at least not to do wrong). These
    people made fortunes and gained political weight in Ter-Petrosjan's
    days. He posed a threat only to a narrow circle of players directly
    involved in his confrontation with Kocharjan-Sarkisjan duo on the
    side of the latter. As far as practically all of the elite was
    concerned, Ter-Petrosjan was all right.

    As a matter of fact, Ter-Petrosjan knew that he should rely on the
    resources the authorities themselves would be relying on -
    bureaucracy, oligarchs, and security structures. His whole
    presidential campaign was arranged in such a manner as to convince
    these people that he posed no threats to them. It seems that
    Ter-Petrosjan succeeded. Cracks began developing in the previously
    monolithic support of the regime. These cracks would have been made
    even deeper and more serious by the second round. That was why
    whether or not Sarkisjan would win in the very first round was the
    central intrigue of the election. Establishment abhors surprises by
    definition. Being thoroughly conservative, it was supposed to vote
    Sarkisjan just because of that.

    (Attempts were made to present Sarkisjan and Ter-Petrosjan as
    pro-Russian and pro-Western politicians. They failed. It was analysts
    in nearby Azerbaijan and Georgia that succumbed to the temptation to
    present the situation as crucial for Moscow's clout with the South
    Caucasus. It became clear to everyone in practically no time at all
    that both candidates, pragmatics as they were, would keep up
    Kocharjan's foreign policy.

    Ter-Petrosjan meant business (i.e. was determined to beat Sarkisjan).
    He tapped every available resource, pulled every string, and called
    in all debts. Ter-Petrosjan's campaign had more than enough sponsors
    - wealthy people prepared to back the erstwhile president. Even some
    political parties backed Ter-Petrosjan. Last but not the least, he
    rallied the so called protest electorate.

    What Ter-Petrosjan is going to do now is anybody's guess. He has
    already said he wanted the outcome invalidated as rigged and another
    election organized. In any event, Ter-Petrosjan is running out of
    time. He must spring whatever surprises he has prepared soon or it
    will be too late. Protest rallies have a tendency to wind down when
    protesters do not see any specific steps taken. Some observers
    therefore anticipate attempts to seize government buildings or even
    foment a civil war. On the other hand, situation in CIS countries is
    not what it used to be 3-4 years ago. The authorities are less
    tentative and mobs less reckless, as proved by the recent
    developments in Georgia. Ter-Petrosjan is surely aware of it. Does it
    mean that he has something altogether different in mind?

    Source: Nezavisimaya Gazeta, No 35, February 22, 2008, p. 3
Working...
X