Tweet
Today, Azerbaijan
Jan 20 2008
Paul Goble: `The Day the Soviet Union Died'
20 January 2008 [13:28] - Today.Az
The exact place and time the Soviet Union died continues to be a
matter of debate.
Some say it occurred when Gorbachev handed over the nuclear football
to Yeltsin at the end of December 1991. Others argue it took place
earlier that month when the three Slavic presidents met to do away
with the Soviet leader's job.
Still others point to the failure of the Moscow coup in August of
that year, the occasion of Yeltsin's triumph and Gorbachev's complete
failure to understand what had taken place in his country. And some
say it coincided with the Kremlin's murderous attacks on the people
of Lithuania and Latvia in January 1991.
But perhaps the moment that has the best claim to be the occasion
when the Soviet Union died is one that up to now has had fewer
advocates. It occurred a year earlier in Baku, when Moscow sought to
suppress the Azerbaijanis but unwittingly snapped the fraying bonds
of loyalty to the USSR that nation and others as well had felt.
On January 19-20, 1990, a date commemorated this year as every year
by the people of Azerbaijan, Soviet security forces went on a rampage
in Baku, killing or wounding hundreds of its citizens. While the
exact number of victims is disputed, it was almost certainly greater
than the total of all other Soviet police actions under Gorbachev.
The Soviet president and his comrades acted not to protect ethnic
Armenians as they claimed but rather to punish Azerbaijanis for their
increasingly independent stance and to send a message to them and to
all the other republics that their Moscow rulers were prepared to do
anything, including murder, to hold on to their power.
But the brutality of this act of state terrorism - a Soviet tank ran
over the car carrying some senior members of the Azerbaijani Academy
of Sciences, and Soviet soldiers shot people at random on the street
or even those looking out the windows of their apartments - had
exactly the opposite effect that Moscow intended.
In Azerbaijan, the Kremlin's action convinced even those who had
doubted it before that they could have no future inside the USSR.
Indeed, the day after the killings, many Communist Party members
there, including some of its most senior leaders, tore up their party
cards, an action that showed there would be now going back.
And elsewhere in the USSR the message Gorbachev and the Soviet
leadership hoped to send backfired. Both where many were already
seeking independence from Moscow and where few had yet thought about
it, Soviet actions in Baku 18 years ago today did not intimidate but
rather destroyed the fear that had kept the USSR together.
Besides the need for simple historical accuracy, there are three
reasons for people in the region and the world why it is vitally
important for everyone in the region and beyond to recognize that
January 1990 in Baku was the time and place of the demise of the
Soviet Union.
First, given the difficulties and uncertainties of the post-Soviet
transitions in many of these countries, some members of the older
generation there now view the Soviet past with nostalgia. Having
forgotten the evils of that system, they even tell pollsters that the
Brezhnev years were "a golden age" when they were secure and their
country respected.
Some political leaders across this region even have sought to exploit
such attitudes to build their own power either by arguing, as
Russia's Vladimir Putin has done, that the end of the USSR was the
greatest tragedy in the 20th century, or suggesting that the peoples
of this region need Soviet-style stability even at the cost of
freedom.
Such leaders naturally do not talk about the violence the Soviet
system visited on individuals and groups whose only "crime" was to
speak the truth and to entire nations - be there Kazakhs, Lithuanians
or Azerbaijanis - whose only "deviation" was to want to have the
chance to determine their own destinies.
Recalling to these people what happened at Baku 18 years ago today is
thus important as a powerful antidote to any who have so forgotten
what the Soviet system was like that they would support its full or
partial return.
Second, with each passing year, the share of the population in the
post-Soviet states who lived under and were shaped by the communist
regime is declining, and in many places, it is falling fast. Few
under the age of 40 today were formed by the communist regime, and
none at all of those who are now under the age of 30.
Because these younger people do not have immediate memories of what
Soviet rule meant, they frequently have a distorted or at least
incomplete view of what it was about and thus are available for
mobilization by unscrupulous politicians who play up what they say
were the "glories" of that system while saying nothing about its
costs.
The danger that young people, who should be the hope of the future,
might help power a return to that past is so great that one
Belarusian paper this week went out of its way to explain to the
generation which never knew the USSR why no one should want its
return
(http://www.gazetaby.com/index.php?sn_nid=10925& amp;sn_cat=37).
The Soviet Union, "Salidarnasts'" wrote, began its life as "an
unbridled, cruel and clever monster" but ended as "a powerless,
malicious and pathetic figure," capable of massive but senseless
violence against its own people and others, yet incapable of giving
anyone freedom, dignity, or a better life.
That system "would have been 85 years old on December 30th" of last
year, the Belarusian paper observed, "But happily the USSR did not
survive to that date." One of the reasons it did not is that despite
its outwardly impressive coercive powers, its people - again be they
Balts, Belarusians or the residents of Baku - no longer respected it.
Having failed to provide any basis for loyalty other than fear, the
Soviet Union was swept away into the dustbin of history it was always
threatening to send others to when people there demonstrated that
they were no longer afraid and that for them, Moscow's period use of
violence simply underscored the weakness of the system.
Informing this younger generation whose members never lived under
communism about how that tectonic shift occurred in the Azerbaijani
capital 18 years ago today thus can help immunize them against the
duplicitous claims of those who distort the history of the Soviet
past for their own purposes.
And third, many far beyond the borders of what was the Soviet Union
need to learn in detail what happened in Baku and why the events
there played such a critical role in the demise of the USSR so that
they will be able to escape the still-widespread myths about just
what happened here.
On the one hand, because so few people in the West in 1990 looked
beyond Moscow except to those republics with large and active
co-ethnic communities in the West, many analysts there continue to
exaggerate the role of the Russians and those with such ties in the
demise of the Soviet Union while minimizing the contributions of
others.
To say this is in no way to play down the contributions that the
Russians and these others made to the demise of the Soviet system
both by calling attention to other crimes and by their struggling
against the system. These were enormous. But both historical justice
and the possibility of a better future requires a more comprehensive
picture.
And on the other, because so many people in the West then and now
view predominantly Muslim countries like Azerbaijan only through the
prism of their conflicts with non-Muslims and as the objects of
history rather than its subjects, they are unprepared to acknowledge
the independent importance of what happens in these states.
The continuing failure of many in Western countries to do so
reinforces a highly selective, culturally myopic view of the
historical record. And far more seriously, it undermines the chances
that Western countries and the peoples of these countries have to
work together.
Reminding those in the West who have a less than comprehensive view
about what happened in Baku 18 years ago today and the role that the
people of Azerbaijan played in the death of the Soviet Union thus can
ensure that they will be better prepared to help create a future in
which tragedies like Black January will never happen again.
Paul Goble
Baku, January 20
URL: http://www.today.az/news/society/42491.html
Jan 20 2008
Paul Goble: `The Day the Soviet Union Died'
20 January 2008 [13:28] - Today.Az
The exact place and time the Soviet Union died continues to be a
matter of debate.
Some say it occurred when Gorbachev handed over the nuclear football
to Yeltsin at the end of December 1991. Others argue it took place
earlier that month when the three Slavic presidents met to do away
with the Soviet leader's job.
Still others point to the failure of the Moscow coup in August of
that year, the occasion of Yeltsin's triumph and Gorbachev's complete
failure to understand what had taken place in his country. And some
say it coincided with the Kremlin's murderous attacks on the people
of Lithuania and Latvia in January 1991.
But perhaps the moment that has the best claim to be the occasion
when the Soviet Union died is one that up to now has had fewer
advocates. It occurred a year earlier in Baku, when Moscow sought to
suppress the Azerbaijanis but unwittingly snapped the fraying bonds
of loyalty to the USSR that nation and others as well had felt.
On January 19-20, 1990, a date commemorated this year as every year
by the people of Azerbaijan, Soviet security forces went on a rampage
in Baku, killing or wounding hundreds of its citizens. While the
exact number of victims is disputed, it was almost certainly greater
than the total of all other Soviet police actions under Gorbachev.
The Soviet president and his comrades acted not to protect ethnic
Armenians as they claimed but rather to punish Azerbaijanis for their
increasingly independent stance and to send a message to them and to
all the other republics that their Moscow rulers were prepared to do
anything, including murder, to hold on to their power.
But the brutality of this act of state terrorism - a Soviet tank ran
over the car carrying some senior members of the Azerbaijani Academy
of Sciences, and Soviet soldiers shot people at random on the street
or even those looking out the windows of their apartments - had
exactly the opposite effect that Moscow intended.
In Azerbaijan, the Kremlin's action convinced even those who had
doubted it before that they could have no future inside the USSR.
Indeed, the day after the killings, many Communist Party members
there, including some of its most senior leaders, tore up their party
cards, an action that showed there would be now going back.
And elsewhere in the USSR the message Gorbachev and the Soviet
leadership hoped to send backfired. Both where many were already
seeking independence from Moscow and where few had yet thought about
it, Soviet actions in Baku 18 years ago today did not intimidate but
rather destroyed the fear that had kept the USSR together.
Besides the need for simple historical accuracy, there are three
reasons for people in the region and the world why it is vitally
important for everyone in the region and beyond to recognize that
January 1990 in Baku was the time and place of the demise of the
Soviet Union.
First, given the difficulties and uncertainties of the post-Soviet
transitions in many of these countries, some members of the older
generation there now view the Soviet past with nostalgia. Having
forgotten the evils of that system, they even tell pollsters that the
Brezhnev years were "a golden age" when they were secure and their
country respected.
Some political leaders across this region even have sought to exploit
such attitudes to build their own power either by arguing, as
Russia's Vladimir Putin has done, that the end of the USSR was the
greatest tragedy in the 20th century, or suggesting that the peoples
of this region need Soviet-style stability even at the cost of
freedom.
Such leaders naturally do not talk about the violence the Soviet
system visited on individuals and groups whose only "crime" was to
speak the truth and to entire nations - be there Kazakhs, Lithuanians
or Azerbaijanis - whose only "deviation" was to want to have the
chance to determine their own destinies.
Recalling to these people what happened at Baku 18 years ago today is
thus important as a powerful antidote to any who have so forgotten
what the Soviet system was like that they would support its full or
partial return.
Second, with each passing year, the share of the population in the
post-Soviet states who lived under and were shaped by the communist
regime is declining, and in many places, it is falling fast. Few
under the age of 40 today were formed by the communist regime, and
none at all of those who are now under the age of 30.
Because these younger people do not have immediate memories of what
Soviet rule meant, they frequently have a distorted or at least
incomplete view of what it was about and thus are available for
mobilization by unscrupulous politicians who play up what they say
were the "glories" of that system while saying nothing about its
costs.
The danger that young people, who should be the hope of the future,
might help power a return to that past is so great that one
Belarusian paper this week went out of its way to explain to the
generation which never knew the USSR why no one should want its
return
(http://www.gazetaby.com/index.php?sn_nid=10925& amp;sn_cat=37).
The Soviet Union, "Salidarnasts'" wrote, began its life as "an
unbridled, cruel and clever monster" but ended as "a powerless,
malicious and pathetic figure," capable of massive but senseless
violence against its own people and others, yet incapable of giving
anyone freedom, dignity, or a better life.
That system "would have been 85 years old on December 30th" of last
year, the Belarusian paper observed, "But happily the USSR did not
survive to that date." One of the reasons it did not is that despite
its outwardly impressive coercive powers, its people - again be they
Balts, Belarusians or the residents of Baku - no longer respected it.
Having failed to provide any basis for loyalty other than fear, the
Soviet Union was swept away into the dustbin of history it was always
threatening to send others to when people there demonstrated that
they were no longer afraid and that for them, Moscow's period use of
violence simply underscored the weakness of the system.
Informing this younger generation whose members never lived under
communism about how that tectonic shift occurred in the Azerbaijani
capital 18 years ago today thus can help immunize them against the
duplicitous claims of those who distort the history of the Soviet
past for their own purposes.
And third, many far beyond the borders of what was the Soviet Union
need to learn in detail what happened in Baku and why the events
there played such a critical role in the demise of the USSR so that
they will be able to escape the still-widespread myths about just
what happened here.
On the one hand, because so few people in the West in 1990 looked
beyond Moscow except to those republics with large and active
co-ethnic communities in the West, many analysts there continue to
exaggerate the role of the Russians and those with such ties in the
demise of the Soviet Union while minimizing the contributions of
others.
To say this is in no way to play down the contributions that the
Russians and these others made to the demise of the Soviet system
both by calling attention to other crimes and by their struggling
against the system. These were enormous. But both historical justice
and the possibility of a better future requires a more comprehensive
picture.
And on the other, because so many people in the West then and now
view predominantly Muslim countries like Azerbaijan only through the
prism of their conflicts with non-Muslims and as the objects of
history rather than its subjects, they are unprepared to acknowledge
the independent importance of what happens in these states.
The continuing failure of many in Western countries to do so
reinforces a highly selective, culturally myopic view of the
historical record. And far more seriously, it undermines the chances
that Western countries and the peoples of these countries have to
work together.
Reminding those in the West who have a less than comprehensive view
about what happened in Baku 18 years ago today and the role that the
people of Azerbaijan played in the death of the Soviet Union thus can
ensure that they will be better prepared to help create a future in
which tragedies like Black January will never happen again.
Paul Goble
Baku, January 20
URL: http://www.today.az/news/society/42491.html