Tweet
MEDIA SCUFFLE MARKS START OF ARMENIA'S PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN
Marianna Grigoryan
EurasiaNet
Jan 25 2008
NY
With the official start of Armenia's presidential election campaign
this week, candidates are taking to the airwaves to make a broad
array of political promises.
Although the pledge to wipe out corruption could prove the campaign's
overarching theme, candidates are offering voters everything from a
quadrupling of pensions and the creation of thousands of new jobs to
the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. [For background see
the Eurasia Insight archive]. The election will be held on February 19.
The candidate list, finalized on January 21, combines several seasoned
political veterans with a few relatively unknown figures.
The nine contenders are; Prime Minister Serzh Sarkisian, Republican
Party of Armenia leader; former President Levon Ter Petrosian; Deputy
Parliamentary Speaker Vahan Hovhannisian, Armenian Revolutionary
Federation; Rule of Law Party Chairman Artur Baghdasarian; National
Democratic Union leader Vazgen Manukian; National Unity Party
Chairman Artashes Geghamian; People's Party leader Tigran Karapetian;
Arman Manukian, former foreign policy advisor to the de facto former
president of Nagorno-Karabakh, Arkady Ghukassian; and National Consent
Party leader Aram Harutyunian.
As in Armenia's May 2007 parliamentary elections, public television
has quickly emerged as the chief vehicle for reaching voters. [For
additional information see EurasiaNet's Armenia: Vote 2007 special
feature]. Under the election code, candidates during the campaign are
allowed 60 minutes of free airtime and two hours of paid airtime on
public television; two hours of free broadcasts and two and a half
hours of paid broadcasts are allowed on public radio. The cost of
one minute of airtime on public and private television ranges from
80,000 to 130,000 drams (about $264-$429).
By law, though, candidates can spend no more than 70 million drams
(about $230,000) on their campaigns. An additional chance for voter
exposure exists for candidates such as Prime Minister Sarkisian and
Deputy Parliamentary Speaker Hovhannisian, who are able to make use of
televised appearances for events not related to the election campaign.
Despite the controversy surrounding television coverage in the past,
and ongoing opposition criticism of public television's coverage
decisions, a representative of the ruling Republican Party of Armenia
denies that the existing arrangement favors Sarkisian. "All conditions
have been created for an equal election struggle," said party spokesman
Eduard Sharmazanov. "Television channels provide proportional coverage
of the campaigns and the airtime to use for campaign purposes is the
same for all. The opposition has nothing to complain about."
"If someone fails to do something, he may well be looking for others
to blame," Sharmazanov added.
Armenian Public Television's administration has repeatedly stated
that it will maintain "equal conditions" for all candidates.
Opposition members charge that the station's election coverage is
far from balanced. The heaviest criticism of Sarkisian occurs in
newspapers with circulations in the thousands at best - a fraction
of public television's audience. Meanwhile, public television often
refers to Ter Petrosian, Sarkisian's lead challenger, as the leader
of the former ruling Pan-Armenian National Movement, rather than as
a presidential candidate. Ter Petrosian, who founded the movement in
1989, has not headed the party since the 1990s.
"In fact, it is totally distorted in a most vulgar way," Nikol
Pashinian, a key Ter Petrosian supporter and editor-in-chief of the
opposition Haykakan Zhamanak daily, said about public television's
campaign coverage. "We take reporters in half-empty buses to the
regions to provide coverage, like all candidates do. As a result,
public television makes it seem that we're transporting people on
buses to make [our] rallies look 'well-attended'."
Suren Sureniants, a member of the political council of the opposition
Hanrapetutiun (Republic) Party and another prominent Ter Petrosian
supporter, took issue with public television footage of the campaign's
January 22 rally in Yerevan, suggesting that the channel sought to
downplay the notion that Ter Petrosian has a substantial political
following. The report on the rally "showed a completely empty square
where a few people were standing," he alleged.
Sureniants looks to the free airtime allotted to each candidate to
correct such allegedly mistaken impressions.
The campaign for Baghdasarian, leader of the Rule of Law Party, agrees
that free airtime is critical, but believes that public television
has provided "coverage of all candidates' campaigns," albeit "with
little time" overall given to candidate coverage.
"It is the presidential elections and it is clear that a candidate's
rating can be spoiled even by one piece of footage," Baghdasarian
spokeswoman Susanna Abrahamian said. She claims a "very warm" meeting
held by Baghdasarian with voters in the northwestern town of Artik was
misrepresented when public television added a shot of the candidate
drinking water after footage of the audience applauding him. "As
a result, it appeared that our candidate was drinking water to the
applause," Abrahamian said. "Is that right?"
Armenian Public Television Deputy Executive Director Gnel Nalbandian
counters that it is up to each media outlet alone to decide how to
cover the elections.
"All candidates want their campaign to be covered the way they want,
but we are not going to campaign for one candidate or another.
Television companies, newspapers have policies of their own, their
own approaches," Nalbandian told EurasiaNet. "We watch closely
that the principle of balance is preserved, and if candidates think
that the facts are distorted, they can go to the courts and demand
a refutation."
Gagik Tadevosian, a supporter of presidential candidate Artashes
Geghamian, believes that there is nothing new in all this. "They cover
candidates' campaigns on all television channels sometimes neutrally,
sometimes with sarcasm," said Tadevosian, a member of Geghamian's
National Unity Party. "Depending on its own political framework,
every channel looks at everything from its own perspective."
Media monitoring will be part of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human
Rights observation mission's first election campaign report, to be
released on January 30. The Yerevan Press Club, which periodically
monitors Armenia's eight television companies, soon will also present
the results of its observations. A Press Club representative declined
to comment on media coverage to date, saying that the organization
does not "yet possess a complete analysis."
Marianna Grigoryan
EurasiaNet
Jan 25 2008
NY
With the official start of Armenia's presidential election campaign
this week, candidates are taking to the airwaves to make a broad
array of political promises.
Although the pledge to wipe out corruption could prove the campaign's
overarching theme, candidates are offering voters everything from a
quadrupling of pensions and the creation of thousands of new jobs to
the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. [For background see
the Eurasia Insight archive]. The election will be held on February 19.
The candidate list, finalized on January 21, combines several seasoned
political veterans with a few relatively unknown figures.
The nine contenders are; Prime Minister Serzh Sarkisian, Republican
Party of Armenia leader; former President Levon Ter Petrosian; Deputy
Parliamentary Speaker Vahan Hovhannisian, Armenian Revolutionary
Federation; Rule of Law Party Chairman Artur Baghdasarian; National
Democratic Union leader Vazgen Manukian; National Unity Party
Chairman Artashes Geghamian; People's Party leader Tigran Karapetian;
Arman Manukian, former foreign policy advisor to the de facto former
president of Nagorno-Karabakh, Arkady Ghukassian; and National Consent
Party leader Aram Harutyunian.
As in Armenia's May 2007 parliamentary elections, public television
has quickly emerged as the chief vehicle for reaching voters. [For
additional information see EurasiaNet's Armenia: Vote 2007 special
feature]. Under the election code, candidates during the campaign are
allowed 60 minutes of free airtime and two hours of paid airtime on
public television; two hours of free broadcasts and two and a half
hours of paid broadcasts are allowed on public radio. The cost of
one minute of airtime on public and private television ranges from
80,000 to 130,000 drams (about $264-$429).
By law, though, candidates can spend no more than 70 million drams
(about $230,000) on their campaigns. An additional chance for voter
exposure exists for candidates such as Prime Minister Sarkisian and
Deputy Parliamentary Speaker Hovhannisian, who are able to make use of
televised appearances for events not related to the election campaign.
Despite the controversy surrounding television coverage in the past,
and ongoing opposition criticism of public television's coverage
decisions, a representative of the ruling Republican Party of Armenia
denies that the existing arrangement favors Sarkisian. "All conditions
have been created for an equal election struggle," said party spokesman
Eduard Sharmazanov. "Television channels provide proportional coverage
of the campaigns and the airtime to use for campaign purposes is the
same for all. The opposition has nothing to complain about."
"If someone fails to do something, he may well be looking for others
to blame," Sharmazanov added.
Armenian Public Television's administration has repeatedly stated
that it will maintain "equal conditions" for all candidates.
Opposition members charge that the station's election coverage is
far from balanced. The heaviest criticism of Sarkisian occurs in
newspapers with circulations in the thousands at best - a fraction
of public television's audience. Meanwhile, public television often
refers to Ter Petrosian, Sarkisian's lead challenger, as the leader
of the former ruling Pan-Armenian National Movement, rather than as
a presidential candidate. Ter Petrosian, who founded the movement in
1989, has not headed the party since the 1990s.
"In fact, it is totally distorted in a most vulgar way," Nikol
Pashinian, a key Ter Petrosian supporter and editor-in-chief of the
opposition Haykakan Zhamanak daily, said about public television's
campaign coverage. "We take reporters in half-empty buses to the
regions to provide coverage, like all candidates do. As a result,
public television makes it seem that we're transporting people on
buses to make [our] rallies look 'well-attended'."
Suren Sureniants, a member of the political council of the opposition
Hanrapetutiun (Republic) Party and another prominent Ter Petrosian
supporter, took issue with public television footage of the campaign's
January 22 rally in Yerevan, suggesting that the channel sought to
downplay the notion that Ter Petrosian has a substantial political
following. The report on the rally "showed a completely empty square
where a few people were standing," he alleged.
Sureniants looks to the free airtime allotted to each candidate to
correct such allegedly mistaken impressions.
The campaign for Baghdasarian, leader of the Rule of Law Party, agrees
that free airtime is critical, but believes that public television
has provided "coverage of all candidates' campaigns," albeit "with
little time" overall given to candidate coverage.
"It is the presidential elections and it is clear that a candidate's
rating can be spoiled even by one piece of footage," Baghdasarian
spokeswoman Susanna Abrahamian said. She claims a "very warm" meeting
held by Baghdasarian with voters in the northwestern town of Artik was
misrepresented when public television added a shot of the candidate
drinking water after footage of the audience applauding him. "As
a result, it appeared that our candidate was drinking water to the
applause," Abrahamian said. "Is that right?"
Armenian Public Television Deputy Executive Director Gnel Nalbandian
counters that it is up to each media outlet alone to decide how to
cover the elections.
"All candidates want their campaign to be covered the way they want,
but we are not going to campaign for one candidate or another.
Television companies, newspapers have policies of their own, their
own approaches," Nalbandian told EurasiaNet. "We watch closely
that the principle of balance is preserved, and if candidates think
that the facts are distorted, they can go to the courts and demand
a refutation."
Gagik Tadevosian, a supporter of presidential candidate Artashes
Geghamian, believes that there is nothing new in all this. "They cover
candidates' campaigns on all television channels sometimes neutrally,
sometimes with sarcasm," said Tadevosian, a member of Geghamian's
National Unity Party. "Depending on its own political framework,
every channel looks at everything from its own perspective."
Media monitoring will be part of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human
Rights observation mission's first election campaign report, to be
released on January 30. The Yerevan Press Club, which periodically
monitors Armenia's eight television companies, soon will also present
the results of its observations. A Press Club representative declined
to comment on media coverage to date, saying that the organization
does not "yet possess a complete analysis."