Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: HRW Report: Human Rights Trend Is "Retrograde"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: HRW Report: Human Rights Trend Is "Retrograde"

    HRW REPORT: HUMAN RIGHTS TREND IS "RETROGRADE"

    BIA
    Jan 31 2008
    Turkey

    The annual Human Rights Watch Report on Turkey is pessimistic about
    developments. The report condemns freedom of speech violations,
    harassment of the DTP, violence against minorities and civilians.

    Recent trends in human rights protection in Turkey have been
    retrograde. 2007 saw an intensification of speech-related prosecutions
    and convictions, controversial rulings by the judiciary in defiance of
    international human rights law, harassment of pro-Kurdish Democratic
    Society Party (DTP) officials and deputies, and a rise in reports of
    police brutality.

    The state authorities' intolerance of difference or dissenting opinion
    has created an environment in which there have been instances of
    violence against minority groups. In January 2007 Turkish-Armenian
    journalist and human rights defender Hrant Dink was murdered.

    Armed clashes between the military and the Kurdistan Workers' Party
    (PKK) rose in the lead-up to elections in July and intensified yet
    further in the second half of the year, with heavy loss of life;
    some attacks-such as a suspected PKK bombing in Ankara in May-have
    targeted civilians.

    Prior to the general election, the Turkish military intervened directly
    in the political arena by voicing opposition to the ruling Justice
    and Development Party (AKP) government and by decisively influencing
    a constitutional court decision to block the presidential candidacy
    of the AKP's Abdullah Gul. The AKP nevertheless won 47 percent of the
    vote in the early general election precipitated by the presidential
    crisis, and subsequently secured the election of Abdullah Gul as
    president. The AKP government embarked on plans for a new constitution
    to replace that put in place under the military regime in 1982.

    Human Rights Defenders The criminalization of speech remains a key
    obstacle to the protection of human rights in Turkey, contributing
    to an atmosphere of intolerance that assumed violent proportions in
    2007. On January 19 the journalist and human rights defender Hrant
    Dink was shot dead outside his office. Dink came to public notoriety
    because he was repeatedly prosecuted for speech-related crimes and,
    in 2006, convicted for "publicly insulting Turkishness" under article
    301 of the penal code. The trial of 12 suspects indicted for Dink's
    murder, among them the 17-year-old gunman, began on July 2, but the
    authorities have to date failed to act on significant evidence of
    negligence or possible collusion by the security forces.

    Other public figures associated with human rights advocacy also
    received death threats. Burdensome registration procedures and
    legal restrictions on associations continued. The LGBT organization
    Lambdaistanbul, for example, was prosecuted for having aims that were
    against "law and morality" and faced possible closure.

    Freedom of Expression and Assembly After its electoral victory
    in July, the new AKP government failed to take immediate steps
    to restart the stalled reform process by lifting restrictions on
    freedom of expression such as article 301, and elements of the legal
    establishment opposed to reform continued to prosecute and convict
    individuals for speech-related offences, as well as for staging
    unauthorized demonstrations.

    Over 2007 hundreds of individuals, among them journalists, writers,
    publishers, academics, human rights defenders, and, above all,
    officials of Kurdish political parties and associations, were
    prosecuted. Some were convicted.

    In October 2007 Arat Dink, son of Hrant Dink and editor of the
    bilingual Turkish-Armenian newspaper Agos (Furrow), and the newspaper's
    owner Serkis Sarkopyan were given one-year suspended sentences for
    "insulting Turkishness" under article 301. They had reported a July
    2006 Reuters interview with Hrant Dink in which he had referred to the
    "Armenian genocide." No other newspaper that reported Hrant Dink's
    words to Reuters has been prosecuted.

    Officials of the pro-Kurdish Democratic Society Party (DTP)-which
    stood independent in the election and gained 22 seats-were repeatedly
    convicted for speech-related offences during the year. Some were
    detained for several months pending trial. The number of prosecutions
    was significantly higher than in previous years, lending credence
    to suggestions that concerted efforts were being made to block
    their political activity and restrict their freedom of assembly in
    an election year. In November the closure of the DTP was pending
    before the Constitutional Court. Officials of the Kurdish party
    HAK-PAR were also sentenced for using the Kurdish language in their
    political party activities; a Constitutional Court closure case is
    still pending against the party.

    Torture, Ill-Treatment, and Killings by Security Forces Ill-treatment
    appeared to be on the rise in 2007 and was regularly reported as
    occurring during arrest, outside places of official detention, and in
    the context of demonstrations, as well as in detention centers. This
    trend was further exacerbated by the passing in June of a new police
    law granting wide-ranging powers of stop and search. After the new
    law came into force, cases of police brutality were also reported
    in the context of the routine identity checks permitted in the new
    law. There were continuing reports of ill-treatment in prisons and,
    in January, conscientious objector Halil Savda was ill-treated at
    the Tekirdað military barracks.

    Fatal shootings of civilians by members of the security forces remain
    a serious concern. Although police typically state that the killing
    occurred because the individual has failed to obey a warning to stop,
    in some cases these may amount to extrajudicial executions. The fatal
    shooting of Bulent Karataþ near Hozat, Tunceli, in September 2007,
    bore the hallmarks of a summary execution. His companion, Rýza Cicek,
    who survived serious gunshot wounds, explained how he was shot by
    military personnel while on a beekeeping trip. Another suspected
    summary execution was that of the villager Ejder Demir, shot dead near
    Ozalp, Van, in September. Nigerian asylum seeker Festus Okey died of
    gunshot wounds incurred while in police custody in Istanbul in August.

    Attacks on Civilians Suspected PKK bomb attacks targeting civilians
    have continued at intervals in 2007, including a suicide bombing in
    May in the shopping district of Ulus, Ankara, which resulted in eight
    deaths, and two bombings in Izmir in October, killing one man. In
    September a minibus was fired upon near a village in Beytuþþebap,
    Þýrnak province, killing five civilians and seven village guards. As
    of this writing, the perpetrators had not been identified.

    Impunity Turkish courts are notoriously lenient towards members
    of the security forces who are charged with abuse or misconduct,
    contributing to impunity and the persistence of torture and the resort
    to lethal force. Many allegations of torture or killings in disputed
    circumstances never reach the courts and are not investigated. Some
    controversial court rulings in the first half of 2007 stand out.

    In May the Court of Cassation quashed the 39-year sentences of two
    gendarmerie intelligence officers for the November 2005 bombing of
    a bookshop in the southeastern town of Þemdinli that resulted in
    one death. This bombing was widely condemned by human rights groups
    in Turkey as evidence of a resort to lawlessness in the name of
    counterterrorism. Controversially the court ruled that the crime had
    been committed in the course of a counterterrorism operation and that
    the defendants should be retried in a military court. The decision
    is on appeal.

    In April a court in Eskiþehir acquitted four police officers for the
    killing of Ahmet and Uður Kaymaz, in November 2004 in the southeast
    town of Kýzýltepe. The court ignored substantial forensic evidence
    demonstrating that the father and son may have been the victims of
    a summary execution. The case is on appeal.

    There was no progress in the investigation into the widespread
    allegations of police torture following arrests during violent protests
    in March 2006 in Diyarbakýr, into the deaths of 10 demonstrators
    (eight shot dead) during the protests.

    Key International Actors The European Union (EU) remained the most
    important international actor in fostering respect for human rights
    in Turkey. However, the December 2006 EU summit decision to partially
    freeze membership negotiations because of Turkey's relations with
    Cyprus contributed to the perception in Turkey that EU member states
    were reneging on their commitment to Turkey's candidacy.

    After the election in France of President Nicolas Sarkozy in 2007,
    who has repeatedly stated his opposition to Turkey joining the EU,
    in June France used its veto power to block two minor chapters of
    the accession negotiations. In its annual progress report, published
    in November, the European Commission commented on the failure to
    advance reforms in 2007, continuing restrictions on free speech,
    the interference of the military in political affairs, the need to
    strengthen the independence of the judiciary, and the failure to
    further minority rights.

    As of this writing, the European Court of Human Rights has issued
    242 judgments against Turkey in 2007 for torture, unfair trial,
    extrajudicial execution, and other violations. In an October judgment
    that may have implications for the draft constitution, the court
    found that the failure to grant an Alevi schoolgirl exemption from
    constitutionally enshrined compulsory religious education classes
    focused on Sunni Islam constituted a violation of the right to
    education (Hasan and Eylem Zengin v. Turkey).

    In a controversial decision in January the court ruled that the
    existence of the 10 percent electoral threshold, which has been
    argued to deprive in particular pro-Kurdish parties of political
    representation in parliament, did not violate the right of the people
    to freely express their opinion of the choice of the legislature
    (article 3 of protocol 1 of the convention). Two judges dissented,
    pointing to the fact that the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council
    of Europe had in 2004 urged Turkey to lower the threshold, and that
    the threshold was twice as high as the European average (see Yumuk
    and Sadak v. Turkey). In November the case was heard by the Grand
    Chamber of the European Court and judgment is awaited. (HRW/AG)

    --Boundary_(ID_3KUen9JfrGn2na1JSUi5Cg)--
Working...
X