Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Issues of Armenia's Cyber Security

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Issues of Armenia's Cyber Security

    ISSUES OF ARMENIA'S CYBER SECURITY
    Samvel Martirosyan

    "Noravank" Foundation
    10 July 2008

    Year by year Azerbaijan strengthens its positions in the information
    front. It is connected with the fact that official Baku has begun
    devoting more attention and finances to this issue. In its turn Turkey
    traditionally demonstrates the state approach to the very question.

    Security of the Armenian segment of internet
    It is already the fourth year that the Azerbaijani country has been
    waging a war against the Azerbaijani segment of internet. Azerbaijani
    hackers are periodically joined by the Turkish ones. Thus, in February
    2007 were hacked the sites of the ombudsman, `De Facto' agency and the
    one of the National Statistic service under test. The warnings sent to
    the site owners have shown that even many hours after what had happened
    the fact of hacking was not noticed there. Last summer the Azerbaijanis
    made use of the lack of vigilance of the Armenian provider `Web' and
    took control over tens of Armenian sites, including the internet
    projects of `Mediamax' agency hosted in the company's server. During
    several months the company didn't correct its inadvertence, and accused
    the site owners of what had happened. As a matter of fact it turned out
    that the state structures responsible for the security didn't interfere
    in the situation and only constant complains finally made the company
    solve the problems in the server's security system. In the meantime the
    Azerbaijanis are still satisfied with hacking sites or uploading
    anti-Armenian information. However, if we take into consideration that
    the owners of such important sites don't notice the fact of hacking, it
    may make a ground for the Azerbaijanis to spread disinformation
    prepared beforehand when necessary through Armenian sites.

    Such cases of massed attacks on Armenian sites happen several times a
    year. At that, the attacks become more and more professional, more and
    more human and financial resources are involved by the Azerbaijani
    party and more and more important Armenian sites become target of
    attacks. Accordingly, it becomes vitally important not only the
    protection of the state owned sites but also the important Armenian
    ones. There is an impression, more often proved factually, that the
    Azerbaijani special services control a number of hacking groups, and
    the attacks on Armenian sites are realized to reveal their weak points,
    not for mere wracking. In that way it is more probable that a base is
    prepared in Baku to completely destroy the Armenian segment of internet
    when time comes. To confront such a threat and realize massive
    counterattack Armenians must have skilled stuff as well as operation
    strategy worked out beforehand.

    Security of internal network
    Hacking of Armenia's foreign ministry internal network in December of
    the previous year became logical continuation of the Armenian party's
    lack of system and systemized activity of the Azerbaijani party. Even
    basing on open information in the press one could come to a conclusion
    that the Azerbaijani special services controlled a number of hacking
    groups used to attack against Armenia.

    It is not the matter of little importance the task of protecting
    electronic correspondence. To all appearances this issue is not devoted
    appropriate attention to yet. So, the press secretary of Armenia's
    Ministry of Defense has been many years using the free Russian server
    mail.ru to dispatch press-release, the hacking of which is even openly
    advertised in the internet and costs $50. There is no guarantee that at
    the moment this mailbox is not under secret control of Azerbaijanis and
    will be used at a proper time in their purpose.

    It is quite obvious what serious losses may be inflicted by hacking
    electronic perspective of high ranking officials. As a whole, there
    must be a unique strategy of protecting the state internal network,
    system of electronic documents circulation especially taking into
    consideration the fact that in the country are more and more introduced
    systems of electronic government, the danger of unapproved access to
    the system is aggravated. It is not of little importance protection of
    non governmental commercial networks of strategic importance, for
    example, connected with energy systems the vulnerability of which may
    cause catastrophic after-effects.

    Propaganda
    Almost nothing was undertaken by the Armenian party against Azerbaijani
    and Turkish propaganda. The main operations in this direction are
    performed by the Armenians from Armenia and Diaspora who are led by
    their individual patriotism and enthusiasm. For example, the operations
    against the disinformation of Azerbaijani mass media that the Armenians
    of Lvov had claimed for the city to be called `Aryuc,' was conducted
    only by the part of the Armenian internet-community, which managed to
    make most of thy Ukrainian mass media take away the material from
    internet sites. At that, in Azerbaijan and Turkey such issues are
    almost completely undertaken by state structures. At that, not that big
    stuff of specialists from the Armenian party could have conducted
    monitoring of Azerbaijani agitation and disinformation and conducted
    counterattacks. Taking into consideration the big number of Armenians
    involved in information warfare individually, such a structure,
    involving these individuals, could succeed in this front with minimum
    outlets.

    In Armenian press is all the time advertised Azerbaijani and Turkish
    mass media, in particular in the internet. On the whole, one may say
    that according to statistics the Armenian TV and newspapers advertise
    Azerbaijani network resources more than the native ones. Moreover, the
    Armenian mass media reprints the Turkish disinformation without
    checking it properly, in that way replicating it among the Armenian
    audience. Let alone that very often Azerbaijani news are just copied
    preserving such terms as `Karabakh separatists,' in inverted commas are
    used the words `genocide,' `NKR' etc.

    Besides, there isn't even a common course of work with the state
    symbolism. In the Armenian mass media is all the time spread propaganda
    of state symbolism of Azerbaijan and Turkey in the most favorable
    light. At the same time in the Armenian press there isn't even a single
    approach to the NKR map. More often the Armenian audience sees the
    former picture of NKAR (Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region) on TV
    having no connection with Armenia. The fact that in the country no
    attention is paid to such `trifles' is the symptom of lack of
    understanding of the state approach importance both to inward and
    outward propaganda.

    In its turn, in the home market there is a complete lack of state
    approach ` the local mass media almost doesn't elucidate life in
    Nagorno-Karabakh, districts of Armenia, although, while understanding
    the importance of the problem each publication must have its offices of
    the correspondent in Stepanakert, as well as in district centers. As a
    matter of fact there is only one Karabakh agency in the internet,
    Karabakh-Open.com, which is quite quick to inform about the events in
    the NKR. At that, other Armenian mass media pay no attention to this
    resource continuing to draw information from Azerbaijani sources.

    There is quite a paradoxical situation when for most of the Armenians
    the main source of information in the internet is the Azerbaijani
    informational portal Day.az, which at par of visits and citing exceeds
    all the analogical Armenian sites taken together. It is worth
    mentioning that in the period of `emergency' Day.az was very popular
    among Armenians, as it skillfully aggregated the Armenian news from all
    the sources, both official and opposition, which was not able to do any
    of the Armenian publications.

    Conclusion
    In case of preserving up-to-date tendencies Armenia will in the near
    future completely lose the initiative in the information warfare
    against Azerbaijan and Turkey. It becomes vitally important foundation
    of interdepartmental body coordinating information activity of the
    National Security Service, Foreign Office, Ministry of Defense and
    other departments to counteract, and what is more important, to
    initiate activities in this direction.

    Other issues of author
    THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE ISSUE AS ISRAEL INSTRUMENT OF PRESSURE
    [15.05.2008]
    KOSOVO AS THE INSTRUMENT OF GLOBAL INFLUENCE [11.04.2008]
    SOME INFORMATION ASPECTS OF THE ELECTIONS IN GEORGIA [12.02.2008]
    AZERBAIJAN DEVELOPING INFORMATION WAR [29.01.2008]
    Internet as a field of information war against Armenia [18.10.2006]
    Washington and Moscow desiring to change the world's missile balance
    [13.10.2006]
Working...
X