Tweet
TURKEY TO MEDIATE IRAN-WEST TALKS
RIA Novosti
July 24 2008
Russia
On his way back from the inconclusive Geneva talks between Tehran and
the Iran Six over the disputed Iranian nuclear program, Tehran's chief
nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili stopped in Ankara and held talks with
Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babajan.
Babajan, who also met with his Iranian counterpart Manouchehr Mottaki
that same day, flew to Washington after the talks ended.
Tehran, which must reply to the Iran Six proposals offering the
required amount of enriched uranium and state-of-the-art technology to
Iran in exchange for freezing its enrichment activities by August 2,
must accept the offer or face all-out political isolation.
"We are in the strongest possible position to demonstrate that if Iran
does not act then it is time to go back to that (sanctions) track,"
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in her first comments
after Washington broke from its usual policy and joined nuclear talks
with Iran in Geneva on Saturday.
Iranian religious leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, reportedly barred
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from making any decisions on the national
nuclear program. On July 23 Ahmadinejad, who was obviously taken aback
by Western demands, said Iran would not deviate by one inch from its
nuclear program.
It is therefore unclear whether Ankara will manage to save the
situation and find a compromise.
Turkey has already said it would not take part in official talks, and
that its main objective was to tone down the negotiators' positions. It
would be an understatement to say that Ankara and Tehran can profit
from an alliance.
Turkey, which is still on track to become a member of the European
Union, wants to score additional points, while Iran is playing for
time. And no mediator can join the talks overnight.
Ankara wants Iran to assist in solving the Kurdish problem in
Iraq, while Tehran would like to pump natural gas to Europe via
Turkey. Moreover, Turkey is ready to mediate peace talks between
Israel and Syria. Iran wants to mediate negotiations between Turkey
and Armenia and between Armenia and Azerbaijan, another South Caucasian
state patronized by Ankara.
The concerned parties will be unable to compromise on the Iranian
nuclear program unless they heed the interests of Egypt, Israel,
Jordan and the Arab states of the Persian Gulf.
A regional conference could be convened to discuss the Iranian nuclear
program, enabling everyone to speak their mind on the issue, while
the United States and the EU would deal with Israel.
Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit recently said Iran would
be unable to solve its nuclear problem without the support of regional
states, and that Tehran should also pay attention to their interests.
Each time the international community starts discussing the Iranian
nuclear program, the Arab world reiterates its support for Tehran's
right to develop civilian nuclear facilities. This ambiguous
stand implies that the Iranian nuclear program may have military
implications.
Washington still prefers to negotiate separately with Arab
countries. On July 21, Rice met in the UAE with the foreign ministers
and other officials of the six Arab monarchies of the Gulf, namely,
Bahrein, Qatar, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Saudi
Arabia, as well as Jordan, Egypt and Iraq, briefing them on the
nuclear stand-off with Iran.
Under Secretary for Political Affairs William Burns was scheduled to
brief Rice on the results of the July 19 Geneva talks involving chief
EU foreign policy negotiator Javier Solana and Saeed Jalili, secretary
of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, during her stay in Abu
Dhabi and to assess prospects for subsequent negotiations with Tehran.
Joint U.S.-French-British naval exercises in the region are strong
evidence that Iran may face political and economic isolation.
Washington is now pursuing a more active policy with regard to
the Iranian nuclear program, because it does not want the next
administration to tackle this issue. Most importantly, major European
powers, namely Italy, France, the United Kingdom and Germany, have
also started getting tough on this issue.
Consequently, Ankara will have trouble mediating the talks between
Iran and the West. More to the point, the outcome and the long-term
situation in Iran will still depend on Tehran.
The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not
necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.
RIA Novosti
July 24 2008
Russia
On his way back from the inconclusive Geneva talks between Tehran and
the Iran Six over the disputed Iranian nuclear program, Tehran's chief
nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili stopped in Ankara and held talks with
Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babajan.
Babajan, who also met with his Iranian counterpart Manouchehr Mottaki
that same day, flew to Washington after the talks ended.
Tehran, which must reply to the Iran Six proposals offering the
required amount of enriched uranium and state-of-the-art technology to
Iran in exchange for freezing its enrichment activities by August 2,
must accept the offer or face all-out political isolation.
"We are in the strongest possible position to demonstrate that if Iran
does not act then it is time to go back to that (sanctions) track,"
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in her first comments
after Washington broke from its usual policy and joined nuclear talks
with Iran in Geneva on Saturday.
Iranian religious leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, reportedly barred
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from making any decisions on the national
nuclear program. On July 23 Ahmadinejad, who was obviously taken aback
by Western demands, said Iran would not deviate by one inch from its
nuclear program.
It is therefore unclear whether Ankara will manage to save the
situation and find a compromise.
Turkey has already said it would not take part in official talks, and
that its main objective was to tone down the negotiators' positions. It
would be an understatement to say that Ankara and Tehran can profit
from an alliance.
Turkey, which is still on track to become a member of the European
Union, wants to score additional points, while Iran is playing for
time. And no mediator can join the talks overnight.
Ankara wants Iran to assist in solving the Kurdish problem in
Iraq, while Tehran would like to pump natural gas to Europe via
Turkey. Moreover, Turkey is ready to mediate peace talks between
Israel and Syria. Iran wants to mediate negotiations between Turkey
and Armenia and between Armenia and Azerbaijan, another South Caucasian
state patronized by Ankara.
The concerned parties will be unable to compromise on the Iranian
nuclear program unless they heed the interests of Egypt, Israel,
Jordan and the Arab states of the Persian Gulf.
A regional conference could be convened to discuss the Iranian nuclear
program, enabling everyone to speak their mind on the issue, while
the United States and the EU would deal with Israel.
Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit recently said Iran would
be unable to solve its nuclear problem without the support of regional
states, and that Tehran should also pay attention to their interests.
Each time the international community starts discussing the Iranian
nuclear program, the Arab world reiterates its support for Tehran's
right to develop civilian nuclear facilities. This ambiguous
stand implies that the Iranian nuclear program may have military
implications.
Washington still prefers to negotiate separately with Arab
countries. On July 21, Rice met in the UAE with the foreign ministers
and other officials of the six Arab monarchies of the Gulf, namely,
Bahrein, Qatar, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Saudi
Arabia, as well as Jordan, Egypt and Iraq, briefing them on the
nuclear stand-off with Iran.
Under Secretary for Political Affairs William Burns was scheduled to
brief Rice on the results of the July 19 Geneva talks involving chief
EU foreign policy negotiator Javier Solana and Saeed Jalili, secretary
of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, during her stay in Abu
Dhabi and to assess prospects for subsequent negotiations with Tehran.
Joint U.S.-French-British naval exercises in the region are strong
evidence that Iran may face political and economic isolation.
Washington is now pursuing a more active policy with regard to
the Iranian nuclear program, because it does not want the next
administration to tackle this issue. Most importantly, major European
powers, namely Italy, France, the United Kingdom and Germany, have
also started getting tough on this issue.
Consequently, Ankara will have trouble mediating the talks between
Iran and the West. More to the point, the outcome and the long-term
situation in Iran will still depend on Tehran.
The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not
necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.