Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ARMENIA: European Court Rules In Favor Of Embattled Television Stati

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ARMENIA: European Court Rules In Favor Of Embattled Television Stati

    ARMENIA: EUROPEAN COURT RULES IN FAVOR OF EMBATTLED TELEVISION STATION

    CPJ Press Freedom Online, NY
    http://www.cpj.org/news/2008/europe/armenia19ju n08na.html
    Committee to Protect Journalists
    June 19 2008

    New York, June 19, 2008--The European Court of Human Rights ruled
    Tuesday that Armenia's repeated denials of a broadcasting license
    to the independent A1+ television station violated Article 10 of
    the European Convention on Human Rights. According to the verdict,
    the Armenian government must pay the station 20,000 euros (US$31,000)
    in damages.

    Famous for its criticism of Armenian authorities, A1+ was forced
    off the air in 2002 when the National Committee on Television and
    Radio--a regulatory body whose members are directly appointed by the
    president--awarded the station's frequency to another company. Since
    then, the agency has repeatedly rejected A1+ applications for a
    broadcasting license--moves widely viewed as retaliation for the
    station's journalism. When local courts dismissed A1+ appeals as
    unfounded, station owner Mesrop Movsesyan filed an appeal with the
    Strasbourg-based court in 2004.

    "We urge Armenian authorities to view this ruling as a signal to
    grant a license to the station," said Nina Ognianova, CPJ's Europe
    and Central Asia program coordinator. "By granting a license to A1+,
    newly elected President Serzh Sarkisian will demonstrate his commitment
    to press freedom in the country."

    In its verdict, the court found that government regulators refused to
    provide reasons for the denials despite numerous requests from A1+
    management. According to the verdict, the court considered "that a
    licensing procedure whereby the licensing authority gives no reasons
    for its decisions does not provide adequate protection against
    arbitrary interferences by a public authority with the fundamental
    right to freedom of expression."

    The court found that the repeated and unexplained denials violated
    the right to impart information and ideas as outlined in the European
    Convention on Human Rights.
Working...
X