Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unsuccessful blitzkrieg or strength trial?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Unsuccessful blitzkrieg or strength trial?

    PanARMENIAN.Net

    Unsuccessful blitzkrieg or strength trial?

    The Turkish sudden actions gave birth to a number of questions among
    which the most important one is whether or not Iraq is a sovereign
    state. If yes, which were Turkey's grounds for invasion of the
    territory of the independent state?

    04.03.2008 GMT+04:00

    The Turkish army's actions in Northern Iraq obviously didn't bring the
    anticipated results. The negative reaction from the part of the USA
    followed it immediately. In fact, the Secretary of Defense Robert
    Gates demanded that the Turkish troops are withdrawn from the regions
    of Northern Iraq. The Turkish Joint Staff had to justify itself
    mentioning that "the blood of a Turkish soldier is more valuable than
    the military operation." It is clear, that the Kurdistan Workers Party
    is a trouble not for Turkey and Iraq only, but also for Kurdistan
    itself. In any case, this is what the Prime Minister of Kurdistan
    Nechirvan Barzani attempts to show.

    /PanARMENIAN.Net/ He called the PKK to signing an armistice, saying
    that for the regional government of Kurdistan it is not acceptable
    that offensives on neighboring countries are held from the territory
    of Iraqi Kurdistan. Together with this Barzani is certain that the
    USA's behavior was not appropriate. "We think that it was a big
    mistake from the part of the USA to have allowed Turkey to invade and
    bombard the territory of Kurdistan. It wasn't supposed to happen." He
    also touched upon the issue of Turkish military bases, and mentioned
    that the Kurds, together with Baghdad will put the question of their
    withdrawal.

    The Turkish sudden actions gave birth to a number of questions among
    which the most important one is whether or not Iraq is a sovereign
    state. If yes, which were Turkey's grounds for invasion of the
    territory of the independent state? If no, then the USA carries all
    the responsibility for the lack of adequate reaction on such a
    unfriendly action from the part of its Turkish allies.

    The next question is: Why did the Turkish authorities choose this
    exact period for carrying such a wide-raging operation against the
    Kurds. The Kurdish troops are situated in the mountainous areas, and
    these areas are very difficult to access both from air or land either
    in summer or in winter, when the mountains of Kurdistan are all
    covered with snow and the roads are closed. Things are more or less
    clearer here - "little victorious war" is needed for "concealing" the
    inner political crisis in the Turkish society and the gaps caused by
    the expansion of the relations between the Turkish troops, political
    groups and public powers on the one hand, and between the current and
    other authorities on the other.

    There are big disagreements between the militants, who have been the
    guarantee of the secular way of Turkey's development since the times
    of Kemal Ataturk and the Turkish government with its pro-Islamic
    traits, trying to fasten the Islamic values in the country. The local
    war is necessary for the Turkish Islamists to distract the attention
    of the Turkish society from the creeping Islamification for political
    survival and blaming the nation's resentments on the Kurds.

    According to experts, the government of Recep Erdoghan may have the
    opposite results. After Turkey's recognition of the independence of
    Kosovo and the continuation of the Turkish offensives in Iraqi
    Kurdistan which causes the sufferings of the majority of the
    population, the answer to the Turkish actions may become the
    declaration of the independence of the territory of Iraqi
    Kurdistan. And if for the official Ankara the Kurdish rebels are taken
    for terrorists, the Kurdish party they are the symbol of the national
    aspiration, assertion for political and cultural rights of the great
    nation, which is separated by the historical injustice with four
    borders.

    It must be mentioned, that with the demand of several political
    groups, in the European Parliament on March 3-4 a conference is being
    held with the title of "The Destiny of the Kurdish Problem in Northern
    Kurdistan". The importance of this conference is undeniable, since
    Turkey is not standing on the threshold of big changes, also
    constitutional changes. The conference is organized with the
    initiative of five groups: the socialists, liberal, greens, "Democrats
    for Europe", and "Free Europe". Famous political figures and
    parliamentarians from Turkey and Europe, as well as Turkish
    journalists are invited to participate in the conference.

    «PanARMENIAN.Net» analytical department
    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X