Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkish Security Officials Admit Cover-Up In Dink Murder Case

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turkish Security Officials Admit Cover-Up In Dink Murder Case

    TURKISH SECURITY OFFICIALS ADMIT COVER-UP IN DINK MURDER CASE
    By Gareth Jenkins

    Eurasia Daily Monitor
    March 21 2008
    DC

    On March 20, two members of the Turkish Gendarmerie admitted receiving
    detailed intelligence regarding a plot to assassinate Turkish-Armenian
    journalist Hrant Dink and then, after Dink's murder, trying to cover
    up their knowledge by lying to investigators.

    The confessions came as two Gendarmerie officers, known by their
    initials as O. S. and V. S., went on trial for dereliction of duty
    after evidence emerged that the security forces in the eastern Black
    Sea city of Trabzon had been informed of the plot to assassinate Dink
    months in advance but had failed either to apprehend the plotters or
    attempt to protect Dink (Anadolu Ajans, CNNTurk, NTV, March 20).

    On January 19, 2007, the 52 year-old Dink was shot dead
    outside the Istanbul office of the Agos newspaper where he
    worked as editor-in-chief and which serves Turkey's dwindling
    Armenian community. Dink was killed by Ogun Samast, an unemployed,
    poorly-educated 17 year-old who had traveled from Trabzon to carry out
    the assassination. Minors are often used to carry out murders in Turkey
    as, under Turkish law, anyone under 18 they can only be sentenced to a
    maximum of a few years in jail. It later emerged that Samast had been
    a member of a ultranationalist gang with strong Islamist sympathies
    led by the then 24 year-old Yasin Hayal. Hayal and his associates were
    well known to the security forces in Trabzon and some of them worked
    as police informants. On March 20, the gendarmerie officers admitted
    that, in August 2006, one of Hayal's relatives had warned them that
    Hayal was planning to kill Dink and had given him YTL 500 (around $400)
    to buy a gun for the assassination. The officers were also told that
    someone linked to the gang had carried out surveillance of Dink in
    Istanbul and even drawn up diagrams showing the route taken by Dink
    as he traveled from his home to the Agos office (Radikal, Milliyet,
    Sabah, Hurriyet, Cumhuriyet, March 21).

    A soft-spoken advocate of reconciliation between Turks and Armenians,
    in February 2004 Dink wrote a series of articles in Agos calling for
    dialogue without any preconditions. He maintained that an insistence
    that Turkey should first recognize the tragic events of 1915 as a
    genocide was an obstacle to reconciliation. In an article he wrote in
    Agos, Dink called on Armenians to "cleanse their blood of the poison
    of genocide" and engage in dialogue with Turks.

    However, the mere mention of the word genocide resulted in Dink being
    prosecuted under the notorious Article 301 of the Turkish Penal
    Code, which makes it a criminal offence to denigrate the concept
    of "Turkishness." In October 2005, Dink was convicted and given a
    suspended prison sentence of six months. Even though he never served
    time in jail, the publicity surrounding his trial made Dink a hated
    figure for many Turkish ultranationalists. Extraordinarily, given the
    numerous calls for him to be killed in the Turkish ultranationalist
    press and Internet chat rooms and the telephoned death threats that
    Dink himself reported to the Istanbul police, and unlike almost any
    prominent Turkish Muslim who receives similar threats from extremists,
    Dink was not given police protection. When he was killed by Samast
    as he left the Agos office to pay some bills at his local bank,
    Dink was completely alone.

    In their statements to the court, both O. S. and V. S. insisted that
    they had forwarded the intelligence of the plot to kill Dink to their
    commanding officer, Colonel Ali Oz, the head of the Gendarmerie in
    Trabzon. They claimed that Oz had not only failed to take action but,
    during the investigation that followed Dink's murder, had instructed
    them to deny any prior knowledge of the plot to kill Dink.

    When taken in isolation, it would be possible to attribute the cover-up
    simply as an attempt to hide incompetence. But, when combined with
    other evidence that has emerged since Dink's murder, the conclusions
    are more disturbing. When Samast was captured, some of the arresting
    officers took photographs of him posed heroically in front of the
    Turkish flag. Ultranationalist publications and chat rooms buzzed
    with praise for the killing. There were even songs written in Samast's
    honor and posted on YouTube.

    There is little doubt that the majority of Turks, even many Turkish
    nationalists, were appalled by Dink's murder. Indeed, one of the most
    moving tributes to him appeared in Yeni Cag, the main ultranationalist
    daily newspaper. On the evening of January 19, 2007, thousands of
    Muslim Turks joined with Armenians to march through the center of
    Istanbul chanting "We are all Dink" and "We are all Armenians." On
    January 19, 2008, Muslim Turks also dominated the numerous ceremonies
    held to remember Dink on the first anniversary of his murder.

    Nevertheless, the confessions by the two gendarmerie officers will
    reinforce suspicions that racial and religious prejudice remains
    a serious problem both in Turkish society as a whole and in the
    country's security forces. Earlier this year, it emerged that, at
    the time of his death, Andrea Santoro, a Roman Catholic priest who
    was shot by Oguzhan Akdin, a 16 year-old youth with ultranationalist
    and Islamist sympathies, was under surveillance by the police on the
    ludicrous suspicion that he was plotting to facilitate the annexation
    of Turkey's eastern Black Sea coast by Greece. On April 18, 2007,
    three Christian missionaries in the southeastern city of Mardin were
    tortured and then had their throats cut by a group of students from
    a hostel run by an Islamic foundation. During their trial, evidence
    has emerged that these students too were in contact with members of
    the local security forces. Lawyers acting for the families of the
    victims claim that they have been receiving numerous death threats,
    are being harassed by security officials and that key evidence -
    such as tape recordings of confessions detailing links between the
    accused and security officials - that was present at the beginning
    of the trial, has now disappeared.

    There is no suggestion that any high-ranking members of the ruling
    Justice and Development Party (AKP) were involved either in any of
    the killings or in the subsequent cover-ups. But neither does the
    government appear to understand the extent of religious and racial
    prejudice in Turkey or the need to amend legislation that fuels it.

    The effective protection of minorities is a prerequisite for Turkish
    accession to the EU, which has long pressed for the abolition of
    legislation such as Article 301 of the Penal Code (see EDM, January
    8). However, since the beginning of the year, the AKP has preferred
    to focus almost exclusively on trying to push through legislation to
    lift the headscarf ban that prevents pious Sunni women from attending
    university (see EDM, February 11, February 25) and, most recently,
    on legislative changes to circumvent the party itself being outlawed
    following the public prosecutor's application for its closure on
    March 14 (see EDM, March 17).
Working...
X