Tweet
THE WASHINGTON POST: AKP MUSTN'T BE BANNED
PanARMENIAN.Net
05.05.2008 14:05 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Washington Post called on the Bush administration
to prevent banning of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP).
"In many countries where elections and Islam overlap, religious
political parties are suspected - often rightly - of trying to
use the democratic system to advance an illiberal agenda. Turkey,
the most advanced democracy in the Muslim world, has the opposite
problem. Its mildly religious ruling party has led the way in
introducing progressive political and economic reforms and preparing
the country for membership in the European Union. Its secular
opposition, meanwhile, has repeatedly resorted to antidemocratic
tactics," the editorial says.
"The administration ought to make it plain that banning the AKP
would cause serious damage to U.S.-Turkish relations. The United
States has a vital interest in the success of Turkish democracy -
and of the moderate Islamic party that now leads it."
In March 2008, the Turkish Constitutional Court said it will consider
a request to ban the ruling political party of Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan.
The chief prosecutor for the Turkish Court of Appeals, Abdurrahman
Yalcinkaya, handed the court an indictment charging the ruling
Justice and Development Party, known by its Turkish initials AKP,
with stoking an "Islamist-inspired" system of government.
Yalcinkaya called for a total ban on AKP, which has roots in the
religious community, and a five year political ban on Erdogan,
President Abdullah Gul and former parliamentary speaker Bulent Arinc.
Erdogan countered the charges, suggesting the allegations were meant to
"create social unrest."
PanARMENIAN.Net
05.05.2008 14:05 GMT+04:00
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Washington Post called on the Bush administration
to prevent banning of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP).
"In many countries where elections and Islam overlap, religious
political parties are suspected - often rightly - of trying to
use the democratic system to advance an illiberal agenda. Turkey,
the most advanced democracy in the Muslim world, has the opposite
problem. Its mildly religious ruling party has led the way in
introducing progressive political and economic reforms and preparing
the country for membership in the European Union. Its secular
opposition, meanwhile, has repeatedly resorted to antidemocratic
tactics," the editorial says.
"The administration ought to make it plain that banning the AKP
would cause serious damage to U.S.-Turkish relations. The United
States has a vital interest in the success of Turkish democracy -
and of the moderate Islamic party that now leads it."
In March 2008, the Turkish Constitutional Court said it will consider
a request to ban the ruling political party of Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan.
The chief prosecutor for the Turkish Court of Appeals, Abdurrahman
Yalcinkaya, handed the court an indictment charging the ruling
Justice and Development Party, known by its Turkish initials AKP,
with stoking an "Islamist-inspired" system of government.
Yalcinkaya called for a total ban on AKP, which has roots in the
religious community, and a five year political ban on Erdogan,
President Abdullah Gul and former parliamentary speaker Bulent Arinc.
Erdogan countered the charges, suggesting the allegations were meant to
"create social unrest."