Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GUAM As Pompous Project With Limited Capabilities

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GUAM As Pompous Project With Limited Capabilities

    GUAM AS POMPOUS PROJECT WITH LIMITED CAPACITIES
    by Sergei Zhiltsov

    DEFENSE and SECURITY
    May 16, 2008 Friday
    Russia

    NOT A SINGLE REGIONAL PROBLEM SOLVED, GUAM IS DOOMED TO A QUIET DEMISE;
    Proclaiming itself ready to tackle local problems, GUAM aspires to
    leadership in the Black Sea region. Bold declarations are all it has
    been good for so far.

    The Black Sea region attracts more and more attention. Regrettably, it
    is the conflicts that usually attract attention and not the successes
    of economic or political integration accomplished by the countries of
    the region. Tension mounting in the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict area,
    Tbilisi's never ending accusations of Russia, dummies presented as
    Black Sea Fleet missiles - this is a short list of the latest events
    in the region.

    It is clear now that regional organizations like the Black Sea Economic
    Cooperation Organization and GUAM (an alliance of Georgia, Ukraine,
    Moldova, Azerbaijan) are absolutely helpless in dealing with regional
    problems, and GUAM doubly so.

    Proclaiming itself ready to tackle local problems, GUAM aspires to
    leadership in the Black Sea region. Bold declarations are all it has
    been good for so far. GUAM miserably failed to solve any problem of
    the host the region is facing.

    GUAM remains an outfit with a thoroughly amorphous structure with
    good intentions and unclear prospects, with bold ambitions but
    limited capacities. Not even its expansion will make GUAM any better
    in everyone's opinion. Its activities have done nothing to promote
    measures of trust or strengthen regional security. On the contrary,
    they have facilitated tension in the relations between GUAM members on
    the one hand and countries like Armenia and Turkmenistan on the other.

    Kosovo's precedent in the meantime made GUAM's standing even more
    precarious. Its declaration of independence destabilized most
    members of the organization. Georgia (with its runaway Abkhazia and
    South Ossetia), Moldova (Trans-Dniester region), and Azerbaijan
    (Nagorno-Karabakh) refuse to recognize Kosovo as a sovereign
    state. Ukraine chose to remain neutral on the subject, its decision
    all but putting GUAM on the brink of collapse. Moldova announced that
    it might quit GUAM. In fact, it has not regarded membership in GUAM as
    one of the foreign political or economic priorities for some time now.

    As an international structure, GUAM lacks a mechanism of conflict
    settlement in the Commonwealth. All attempts to set up a regional
    security framework without Russia and actually against Russia and
    its clout with the countries of the region are doomed. Ukraine's and
    Georgia's efforts to put together a peacekeeping contingent under the
    GUAM aegis are thwarted by the Moldovans and Azerbaijanis who do see
    any point in involving themselves in a structure that cannot be used
    in the Trans-Dniester region or Nagorno-Karabakh anyway. Moreover,
    Kishinev and Baku know better than to create additional problems in
    their relations with Moscow. Problems are guaranteed as soon as GUAM
    goes military.

    Washington's efforts in the Black Sea region have failed to make it
    more secure or advance bilateral and multilateral contacts between
    the countries of the region. One might say that GUAM remains in
    the periphery of Washington's foreign policy despite all its recent
    initiatives. The structure will probably remain in a stupor, but the
    United States will certainly keep it together as an instrument in
    its geopolitical wars on Russia.
Working...
X