Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Water Quality Needs Improving In Armenia's Rural Areas

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Water Quality Needs Improving In Armenia's Rural Areas

    WATER QUALITY NEEDS IMPROVING IN ARMENIA'S RURAL AREAS

    ARKA
    May 20, 2008

    Below is an exclusive interview by Yelena Manvelyan, Chairperson of
    the Armenian Women for Health and Healthy Environment NGO.

    ARKA: What specific program does your organization plan for 2008?

    Manvelyan: The activities of the Armenian Women for Health and Healthy
    Environment NGO are mainly aimed at sustainable rural development
    with simultaneous resolution of essential problems, namely, water
    supply and drainage, health of the rural population.

    Under a new 3-year contract for 2008-2010, we plan to launch our
    activities in three rural communities, Kakhsi and Solak, Ararat region,
    and Khachpar, Kotayk region. We also plan to expand our activities in
    the field of alternative agriculture. The new contract was possible
    to sign due to the successful implementation of the previous 3-year
    program, which was approved by a monitoring group formed and sent
    to Armenia by our donors. Under the contract, about US $100,000 are
    to be allocated in advance for the new program. It should be noted
    that our partners trust us, and, as the program is implemented and
    new projects are elaborated, this amount may be increased.

    ARKA: What measures were implemented under the NGO's program in
    2005-2007? What is your opinion of the organization's activities in
    that period?

    Manvelyan: We consider the NGO's activities in 2005-2007 as very
    effective. We carried through all the planned, as well as additional,
    projects. The year 2007 saw a successful completion of a 3-year
    series of $140,000 worth development programs in the villages of
    Fontan and Dzoraghbyur, Kotayk region, and Ayanist, Ararat region. The
    programs provided for the installation of water-supply, improvement
    of hygiene and sanitary conditions, implementation of alternative
    sanitary measures.

    Ecotoilets were installed at village homes and schools, new
    water-supply lines were laid and old ones repaired. Water meters
    were installed. The heads of the neighboring communities and school
    headmasters showed interest in our projects and applied to us for the
    implementation of similar programs on a co-financing basis. I would
    like to note that the involvement of communities or local residents
    in the financing is one of the preconditions for the implementation
    of programs.

    ARKA: In which Armenian regions is the NGO working? Do you plan to
    launch activities in other regions?

    Manvelyan: The organization is working in two Armenian regions,
    Ararat and Kotayk. We are not going to launch our activities in other
    regions, but we plan to involve more villages of the two regions in our
    program. This year we plan to launch activities in three more rural
    communities. We use a number of criteria in selecting the villages
    where development programs are to be implemented. As a rule, they
    are villages with socially vulnerable population and refugees from
    Azerbaijan. We also consider the poverty level and susceptibility to
    intestinal diseases.

    ARKA: What is your opinion of the provision with drinking water-supply
    and drainage systems in Armenia's regions?

    Manvelyan: This system is in a poor state in Armenia. At present, only
    10% of Armenia's rural population can use the sewerage system. The
    average time of water-supply in all the communities is 14 hours a
    day, and only 44% of Armenia's rural communities have round-the-clock
    water-supply. It is an especially acute problem in Ararat, Shirak and
    Tavush. Moreover, only 40% of the rural population are satisfied with
    the quality of drinking water.

    The local residents installed individual sewerage systems draining
    the waste water into the nearby river, which pollutes the streams. The
    organization is doing its best to resolve the water-supply problem. For
    example, water-saving ecotoilets can be a way out for many Armenian
    villages.

    Of course, if we lack funds to implement our projects we apply to
    donors, government bodies and companies. We are anxious for government
    bodies and other NGOs to support our ideas.

    ARKA: What specific programs is the organization implementing in
    alternative agriculture?

    Manvelyan: We plan to found a theoretical and practical center
    of alternative agriculture next year to present our experience,
    methods and information resources. Our experts will actively provide
    information on new methods in alternative agriculture. The center is
    most likely to be founded in the village of Solak, Kotayk region. We
    seek organic farming and persuade farmers to stop using pesticides,
    replacing them with natural fertilizers, herbal infusions. Experienced
    specialists in organic farming are working with farmers. At the
    workshops organized in villages they explain to the farmers the
    advantages of organic fertilizers, which will allow them to grow
    ecologically pure products. The organization is also carrying out a
    campaign against soil depletion, as Armenia has a huge percentage of
    such lands.

    Indeed, arable lands occupy a very small area in Armenia, and the
    struggle against soil depletion is most topical.

    ARKA: What local and international organizations is your NGO
    cooperating with?

    Manvelyan: At the international level our organization has numerous
    contacts with its counterparts and carries out effective cooperation
    with them. We often participate in international conferences abroad,
    and our foreign colleagues visit us as well. Our organization is
    a member of a number of NGO networks, namely, Women of Europe for
    Common Future, International POPs Elimination Network and Pesticide
    Action Network (PAN).

    At the local level we are a member of the Coalition of Environmental
    Organizations. We support all the national initiatives dealing with
    ecological problems in the country. As regards the Armenian Government,
    we are working with it by means of lobbying, presenting the local
    problems to the cabinet. Specifically, we are going to address a
    letter to the President and the Government in connection with the
    environmental problems in the country.

    ARKA: Your NGO was the first to raise the problem of the pesticide
    mortuary not far from Yerevan. At what stage is the process of
    resolving the problem?

    Manvelyan: Our organization launched its activities in 1999, and
    persistent organic pollutants (POP) - chloroorganic pesticides -
    were among the fields of its activities. That was the first wave,
    Armenia had just acceded to the Stockholm Convention, which sets the
    principles of applying and eliminating the pesticide waste. We started
    with exploring the pesticide mortuary. It is located in a landslide
    zone, and the pesticides appearing on the surface pose a threat to
    the nearby villages, the holiday village and the Hrazdan River. The
    relevant ministries were informed of the situation, and the RA Rescue
    Service dealt with the problem. The Government set up a task group
    which included a representative of our organization. Although the
    Government allocated funds, they proved insufficient. Additional
    funding is required. The close-down of the mortuary requires about
    â~B¬2mln. This is not a large amount for Armenia, as the funds are
    received from international organizations and from the Diaspora. The
    Armenian Government has to allocate only 30% of the sum. Over 500
    tons of pesticides are buried at the mortuary, but they are still
    active. We have been struggling for the close-down of the mortuary
    for many years, and I hope that we will succeed. We have found a
    French organization specializing in this field and, in cooperation
    with the Rescue Service, elaborated relevant measures. We hope for
    the Government's financial assistance to the project.

    ARKA: As an expert in ecology, what do you think of the operation of
    the Teghut deposit? What are the possible consequences?

    Manvelyan: A number of problems with the operation of the Teghut
    deposit have not yet been resolved. However, I can definitely state
    that the operation of the mine will destroy large woodlands. The
    toxic dust formed as a result of blasting will pose a serious threat
    to the environment and human health. The experience of operation of
    the Kajaran and Akhtala deposits proves that the environment and the
    local population's health will not be protected in Teghut either. -0--

    --Boundary_(ID_18JpwZbwmAnVf6EDC3PO0Q)--
Working...
X