Tweet
ARMENIA'S DE FACTO BORDERS:
A COMMENT BY OUR CORRESPONDENT TO THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE
ARARAT Center for Strategic Research
22 Nov 08
This is encouraging and promising, even though it's happening nearly 15
years after the event! Showing the non-existent borders (at least since
1994!) of the NKAO (Nagorno Karabagh Autonomous Oblast) by Armenian
H1TV, Meteo or any other TV, or the HAAF's (Hayastan All Armenia Fund)
calendars and maps or any other official or semi official Armenian
Republic or Diaspora publication, in my view, must be considered
outright treason. How else can one define deliberate propagation of
false information so consistently regarding such a strategic and
vitally important issue as ones own borders?!
The problem has been raised for several years with HAAF who every year
publishes in their wall calendar the same irresponsible and
non-existent NKAO territory next to the Armenian Republic. Even strong
protests coupled with threats that substantial and generous donations
will be withheld from HAAF unless this unacceptable and irresponsible
mistake is corrected and the proper DE FACTO borders are shown in their
maps lead to no result and the same false map is published once again.
And now we hear that something as basic as national geography school
textbooks have not been changed for nearly a decade therefore no effort
has been made to educate our younger generation simple facts of our
geogra
phical borders feeding them out of date and false information as
fact!
Why has this been tolerated for so long?
So rather than talk about `liberated territories' or `occupied
territories' or `buffer zone' or `security zone', all of which may well
be valid definitions in their specific fields of discourse, as
professor Valesyan has correctly pointed out international law has a
simple solution in cases like this. And that is the concept of DE FACTO
BORDERS. Any other term is not just false which propagates confusion
and non truth but is simply wrong and inappropriate and unpractical. It
follows that any map produced must, MUST, be based on existing
realities - i.e. de facto borders which as a matter of fact are backed
by NKR's constitution, the OSCE sponsored Ceasefire Agreement of May
1994, and far more importantly the joint Army and Armed Forces of NKR
and the Republic of Armenia and therefore their laws!
If Armenia for whatever reason is still unable or unwilling to come to
terms with this glaring reality to call a spade a spade and define its
borders scientifically and accurately then it is not just betraying our
national interest but is being party to spreading confusion in national
and international circles, something which is quite unprecedented
anywhere in the world!
Finally let me end by stating that this failure to properly define ones
own de facto borders ha
s serious negative practical consequences for
Artsakh in that it prevents various international humanitarian agencies
(such as Oxfam for example), amongst others, from coming to Artsakh.
This is because in situations like this (no war no peace as in Artsakh)
these organisations need to know the de facto borders of a given
country backed and protected by law and order (administration backed by
armed forces) of the territory concerned. It certainly does not help
when various agencies of the given de facto territory issue irrelevant,
out of date, false and confusing information regarding their own
national (DE FACTO) borders!
Bagrat Nazarian, Contributing Correspondent (London),
ARARAT Center for Strategic Research
A COMMENT BY OUR CORRESPONDENT TO THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE
ARARAT Center for Strategic Research
22 Nov 08
This is encouraging and promising, even though it's happening nearly 15
years after the event! Showing the non-existent borders (at least since
1994!) of the NKAO (Nagorno Karabagh Autonomous Oblast) by Armenian
H1TV, Meteo or any other TV, or the HAAF's (Hayastan All Armenia Fund)
calendars and maps or any other official or semi official Armenian
Republic or Diaspora publication, in my view, must be considered
outright treason. How else can one define deliberate propagation of
false information so consistently regarding such a strategic and
vitally important issue as ones own borders?!
The problem has been raised for several years with HAAF who every year
publishes in their wall calendar the same irresponsible and
non-existent NKAO territory next to the Armenian Republic. Even strong
protests coupled with threats that substantial and generous donations
will be withheld from HAAF unless this unacceptable and irresponsible
mistake is corrected and the proper DE FACTO borders are shown in their
maps lead to no result and the same false map is published once again.
And now we hear that something as basic as national geography school
textbooks have not been changed for nearly a decade therefore no effort
has been made to educate our younger generation simple facts of our
geogra
phical borders feeding them out of date and false information as
fact!
Why has this been tolerated for so long?
So rather than talk about `liberated territories' or `occupied
territories' or `buffer zone' or `security zone', all of which may well
be valid definitions in their specific fields of discourse, as
professor Valesyan has correctly pointed out international law has a
simple solution in cases like this. And that is the concept of DE FACTO
BORDERS. Any other term is not just false which propagates confusion
and non truth but is simply wrong and inappropriate and unpractical. It
follows that any map produced must, MUST, be based on existing
realities - i.e. de facto borders which as a matter of fact are backed
by NKR's constitution, the OSCE sponsored Ceasefire Agreement of May
1994, and far more importantly the joint Army and Armed Forces of NKR
and the Republic of Armenia and therefore their laws!
If Armenia for whatever reason is still unable or unwilling to come to
terms with this glaring reality to call a spade a spade and define its
borders scientifically and accurately then it is not just betraying our
national interest but is being party to spreading confusion in national
and international circles, something which is quite unprecedented
anywhere in the world!
Finally let me end by stating that this failure to properly define ones
own de facto borders ha
s serious negative practical consequences for
Artsakh in that it prevents various international humanitarian agencies
(such as Oxfam for example), amongst others, from coming to Artsakh.
This is because in situations like this (no war no peace as in Artsakh)
these organisations need to know the de facto borders of a given
country backed and protected by law and order (administration backed by
armed forces) of the territory concerned. It certainly does not help
when various agencies of the given de facto territory issue irrelevant,
out of date, false and confusing information regarding their own
national (DE FACTO) borders!
Bagrat Nazarian, Contributing Correspondent (London),
ARARAT Center for Strategic Research