Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BAKU: Lavrov Rules Out Georgian Scenario In Garabagh

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BAKU: Lavrov Rules Out Georgian Scenario In Garabagh

    LAVROV RULES OUT GEORGIAN SCENARIO IN GARABAGH

    AzerNews Weekly
    Sept 3 2008
    Azerbaijan

    Russia`s recognition, early last week, of the independence of Georgia`s
    rebel regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia has turned up regional
    pressures due to the potential consequences of regional independence
    movements flaring elsewhere within former Soviet republics. The
    concerns are valid, given that Moscow`s actions evidently serves to
    prop up aggressive separatism and further the attempts to forcefully
    redraw the borders of states, not only in the ex-Soviet territories
    but throughout the world.

    Western observers, who harshly criticized Russia`s decision, say the
    encroachment on Georgia`s territorial integrity may signal a dangerous
    scenario for other countries that include separatist regions.

    The issue came to the fore during British Foreign Secretary David
    Miliband`s visit to Ukraine last week. Miliband stressed the need
    for rallying a broad international coalition against Moscow, warning
    that, otherwise, Russia would eventually seek full control over other
    conflict zones within the former USSR. Miliband said, after meeting
    Ukrainian Foreign Minister Vladimir Ogryzko, that the two countries
    would be at the forefront of such a coalition, which will support
    Georgia`s territorial integrity and counter Russia`s aggressive
    actions. The foreign secretary said the outbreak of a fresh Cold War
    does not benefit anyone, and Russia should alter its policy if it
    aspires to gain international respect and influence.

    "The former Soviet empire should be left behind and negotiated
    solutions found to the conflicts in post-Soviet territories, including
    those over Upper (Nagorno) Garabagh [between Azerbaijan and Armenia]
    and Dnestr in Moldova," Miliband said.

    Commenting on the statement, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov
    tried to ease his British counterpart`s concerns. He said the situation
    in Abkhazia and South Ossetia was the result of the Georgian leaders`
    unwise policy, while the situation with the Garabagh and Dnestr
    disputes was completely different.

    "The Dnestr and Garabagh conflicts will not unfold in a scenario
    applied in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, as it is not [Georgian
    President] Mikheil Saakashvili who is holding talks on settling
    them. In Moldova and Azerbaijan, there are no leaders who have lost
    their minds like Saakashvili and are seeking to resolve conflicts
    by force, while destroying their countries. That`s exactly what the
    Georgian leadership did in Abkhazia and South Ossetia," Lavrov said.

    It appears that Russia is trying to assure Azerbaijan and Moldova,
    which have been fighting aggressive separatism along with Georgia,
    that it has no intention to encroach on their territorial integrity and
    recognize the independence of Upper Garabagh and Dnestr. It is evident,
    however, that the Russian foreign minister`s statement stems not from
    efforts to diminish these concerns, but from the "breakup and rule"
    policy inherent to empires. In other words, Moscow is attempting
    to distance Azerbaijan and Moldova from Georgia and to counter these
    countries` joint steps within the regional group, GUAM and, as a whole,
    the international arena.

    In reality, Russia`s plans to split up Georgia are likely to take a
    toll on other countries suffering from separatist threats. It is not
    by mere chance that President Medvedev`s decision to recognize Abkhazia
    and South Ossetia as independent states has been praised by separatists
    in Upper Garabagh, an Azeri region under Armenian occupation.

    "This decision is in full compliance with the principles of
    international law on self-determination of nations," the separatist
    regime claimed in a statement. "We hope that forces interested in
    restoring peace in the region will draw a conclusion from the latest
    developments in the South Caucasus and take practical steps at finding
    a solution to conflicts strictly by peaceful means."

    Meanwhile, a group of Armenian pro-government and non-governmental
    organizations demanded that their government recognize the
    "independence" of Upper Garabagh.

    The appeal branded Georgia`s assault on the pro-Russian region of
    South Ossetia earlier this month as "a military aggression." Based
    upon that, the Armenian groups maintain that there are no prospects
    for a negotiated resolution of "frozen" conflicts in the South
    Caucasus region. They alleged that Tbilisi and Baku, by intentionally
    prolonging the settlement process, are taking advantage of it to
    purchase armaments and strengthen their armies.

    Georgia launched large-scale military operations on August 8 in South
    Ossetia to restore its territorial integrity. Moscow retaliated by
    sending troops to the region, striking at Georgian armed forces with
    overwhelming force. Georgian forces had gained control over the capital
    of the breakaway province, Tskhinvali, but had to retreat a day later
    after a Russian attack. An EU-brokered ceasefire was, subsequently,
    reached on August 17 to end the brief war. It envisions the return
    of both countries` troops to the positions they held prior to the
    outbreak of hostilities. Russia pulled most of its troops from Georgia
    on August 22 but continued to build up its forces in and around the
    two separatist regions after withdrawing from deep inside Georgia.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X