Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Glendale: 'Late' Balloting Is Likely To Be Reviewed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Glendale: 'Late' Balloting Is Likely To Be Reviewed

    'LATE' BALLOTING IS LIKELY TO BE REVIEWED
    By Jason Wells

    Glendale News Press
    April 9 2009
    CA

    City Council candidates say influx of mail-in ballots shouldn't have
    been aided by local group. City clerk rebuffs claims.

    GLENDALE -- Radio transmissions between poll workers Tuesday belied the
    usual election day stressors -- coping with slim staffing, responding
    to public complaints over electioneering, handling overzealous campaign
    staff -- but this year brought its own set of gripes.

    They started March 31, when several City Council candidates complained
    that the Armenian National Committee Glendale chapter representatives
    were overstepping when they transported and then assisted seniors
    with their vote-by-mail ballots in the lobby of City Hall.

    March 31 was the deadline for obtaining an absentee ballot, but dozens
    of seniors, nearly all of Armenian descent, continued to stream into
    City Hall through Monday for late ballots that are typically reserved
    for those who cannot meet the application deadline due to an illness
    or disability.

    Elections officials contend those provisions can be set aside if
    the voter fills out the late-issued ballot and returns it within the
    clerk's office.

    There were roughly 400 vote-by-mail ballots issued past the deadline.

    As of Wednesday, they had yet to be counted with the 866 provisional
    ballots dropped off at polling stations on election day, city
    officials said.

    "The council has to address it," Mayor John Drayman said. "City
    Hall lobby should never become a rodeo, and it was, at a minimum,
    that for several days."

    Councilman Frank Quintero, who was reelected Tuesday with 14.7%
    of the vote, agreed, saying he was "not comfortable" with political
    action committees for groups like the Armenian National Committee
    organizing a late voting process.

    While acknowledging that the late vote-by-mail balloting at City Hall
    was a "campaign tactic," Senior Assistant City Atty.

    Lucy Varpetian said the clerk's office handled the situation in
    accordance with legal interpretations from state and county elections
    officials.

    "Our actions were consistent with the direction we received both from
    the secretary of state and the county of Los Angeles," she said.

    City Clerk Ardy Kassakhian rebuffed claims that the late balloting was
    illegal or part of some sort of organized attempt to take advantage
    of the elections code, attributing the criticisms to a "lack of
    understanding, or fear based on a lack of understanding" of the law.

    "It's best that they leave this to the professionals, who have had
    years of experience in conducting elections," he said.

    Even if no rules were broken, Drayman and others said the issue
    begged a public evaluation to erase any perception that anything
    "untoward" happened.

    Zanku Armenian, chairman of the Armenian National Committee
    Glendale chapter political action committee, said Wednesday that his
    organization "worked hard during this election to ensure that every
    voter was able to exercise their right to vote. Late vote-by-mail
    provisions in the election code give citizens unable to vote on
    election day for last-minute reasons the ability to cast their ballot
    and have their vote count."

    Any move by certain council members to change the voting process
    "smells of yet another attempt by certain council members to create
    barriers to voting," he added.

    Beyond the huffing over election code interpretations, elections
    officials said the citywide process Tuesday went relatively smoothly.

    Coordinating hundreds of volunteers and poll workers across 57
    precincts and ensuring all the stations are adequately equipped and
    prepared is never an easy feat, officials said.

    Complaints over perceived violations of state election codes in
    the field were addressed immediately to head off any flare-ups,
    Varpetian said.

    "We didn't leave anything for tomorrow," she added.

    Still, as in years past, dissent over the role of candidate campaign
    election monitors at polling stations reemerged with a vengeance
    Tuesday.

    Accusations of unfair voter influence and coercion on the part of
    campaign-supplied poll watchers and interpreters were especially
    prevalent at polling stations in south Glendale.

    At a polling station at 700 S. Adams St., elections officials had
    to disperse dozens of poll watchers who at one point outnumbered a
    handful of voters.

    Some of the election monitors were registered with council candidate
    Aram Kazazian's campaign.

    "I don't think it's appropriate that we have to provide safeguards
    for other candidates to make sure they're not degraded," Kazazian
    said Wednesday.

    The accusations were nothing new, and Kassakhian cautioned against
    policy making in response to political complaints, especially when
    Glendale administers its municipal elections in a way "that is
    replicated in cities across the nation each year."

    "People need to get over some of these fears that are peddled by some
    of the candidates and council members," he said. "They have to see
    beyond that."
Working...
X