Tweet
PanARMENIAN.Net
What role can the USA play in normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations?
Karine Ter-Sahakyan
Producers of the performance `Normalization of Armenian-Turkish
Relations' are now drawing up various models of behavior for Yerevan,
Ankara and Baku.
07.04.2009 GMT+04:00
President Barack Obama's visit to Europe ended in an optimistic note:
he visited the Mosque of Hagia Sophia, communicated with the religious
figures and students in Turkey. From the point of view of maintaining
President Obama's own image, the visit was obviously successful. Both
in Europe and Turkey Obama was received as a new US figure, who is
trying to speedily do away with the heritage of George Bush Jr. It is
difficult to assess the extent to which Obama's efforts have been a
success so far, but it's a fact that in certain foreign issues the new
US president is still acting «in a typically American
manner».
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ What was the cost of Obama's statement on the
necessity of Turkey to join the EU? Obama couldn't but be aware of
President Sarkozy and Chancellor Merkel's expected reaction, but he
simply thought `it might work'. In fact, it didn't. To take Turkey
into the EU would mean to put an end to Europe in its present
situation, and if the advisers of the US President have not made it
clear to him, there is nothing more to speak about¦
As Mark Almond writes in The Times, repairing the rifts that George
W. Bush left in America's relations with old friends is the key thrust
of the early Obama agenda. `When the Turkish parliament failed to back
the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, it left the State Department's
spokesman speechless. `The Turks have done what?!' he wailed as he
ripped up his script about America's reliable NATO partner backing the
war against Saddam Hussein. Worse still for President Obama is the
fraught triangular relationship between the United States, Turkey and
the EU. Turkey has spent decades trying to join the EU, only to see
former Communist states in Eastern Europe leapfrog over it,' notices
Almond.
Obama's visit is interesting for Armenia from the point of view of the
US role in fence-mending between Yerevan and Ankara. On the whole,
Barack Obama justified the Armenian hopes: not uttering the word
`genocide' he yet underlined that his position is unchanged and urged
Turkey to `reckon with its past'. Naturally, the border will be opened
neither on April 16, nor after April 24. Producers of the performance
`Normalization of Armenian-Turkish Relations' are now drawing up
various models of behavior for Yerevan, Ankara and Baku. The
«dress rehearsal», as usual, may end in nothing: they
will hold discussions, feel out each other's positions and leave it
till next football match, due in October. But much may occur in the
near future ` the expected meeting of Armenian and Azerbaijani
presidents at the summit of `Eastern Partnership', due in Prague on
May 7. In other words, once again everything rests on the regulation
of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, which, by value for Armenia, is
equal to the US recognition of the Armenian Genocide.
There exists also the Azeri factor, which not once has been dwelt on
in our analyses. In connection with Obama's visit to Istanbul, Baku
has started an unprecedented campaign for hindering the opening of the
Armenian-Turkish border. Letters, requirements ` everything is
used. Even Ilham Aliyev refused to attend the summit `Dialogue among
Civilizations'¦ In the words of Azeri political analyst Zardusht
Alizade, opening of border between Armenia and Turkey is the job of
two independent states, and Azerbaijan must not meddle with
it. Azerbaijan must herself solve her problems and the Karabakh
conflict in particular, and not ask it of Turkey. Opening of border
between Armenia and Turkey is the domestic affair of these countries,
where Azerbaijan is a third party and has nothing to do with opening
the border. `It is a bit difficult to give the precise date of opening
the border as it depends on the negotiation process between the two
countries,' Alizade said, Azeri media reports.
The Turkish opening to Armenia has potentially significant
implications for the balance of power in the Caucasus, says annual
report issued by Stratfor analytical center. `The August 2008
Russo-Georgian war created an unstable situation in an area of vital
importance to Russia. Inn this regard, normalization of relations
between Turkey and Armenia is of extreme importance. Armenians had
long held Turkey responsible for the mass murder of Armenians during
and after World War I, a charge the Turks have denied. The
U.S. Congress for several years has threatened to pass a resolution
condemning Turkish genocide against Armenians. The Turks are
extraordinarily sensitive to this charge, and passage would have meant
a break with the United States,' the report says in particular.
Even if we take into consideration the fact that Turkey is someway
moving away from America, trying to play her own role in the region
and also in the whole world, the US Congress' resolution on the
Armenian Genocide would really affect the balance in the region that
includes not only the Great Middle East, but also the Central Asia or,
to be more exact, the Turkic world. Armenia will appear in complete
isolation and will have to make concessions that may put the country
on the verge of existence. This is the worst scenario, but,
unfortunately, predictable.
What role can the USA play in normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations?
Karine Ter-Sahakyan
Producers of the performance `Normalization of Armenian-Turkish
Relations' are now drawing up various models of behavior for Yerevan,
Ankara and Baku.
07.04.2009 GMT+04:00
President Barack Obama's visit to Europe ended in an optimistic note:
he visited the Mosque of Hagia Sophia, communicated with the religious
figures and students in Turkey. From the point of view of maintaining
President Obama's own image, the visit was obviously successful. Both
in Europe and Turkey Obama was received as a new US figure, who is
trying to speedily do away with the heritage of George Bush Jr. It is
difficult to assess the extent to which Obama's efforts have been a
success so far, but it's a fact that in certain foreign issues the new
US president is still acting «in a typically American
manner».
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ What was the cost of Obama's statement on the
necessity of Turkey to join the EU? Obama couldn't but be aware of
President Sarkozy and Chancellor Merkel's expected reaction, but he
simply thought `it might work'. In fact, it didn't. To take Turkey
into the EU would mean to put an end to Europe in its present
situation, and if the advisers of the US President have not made it
clear to him, there is nothing more to speak about¦
As Mark Almond writes in The Times, repairing the rifts that George
W. Bush left in America's relations with old friends is the key thrust
of the early Obama agenda. `When the Turkish parliament failed to back
the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, it left the State Department's
spokesman speechless. `The Turks have done what?!' he wailed as he
ripped up his script about America's reliable NATO partner backing the
war against Saddam Hussein. Worse still for President Obama is the
fraught triangular relationship between the United States, Turkey and
the EU. Turkey has spent decades trying to join the EU, only to see
former Communist states in Eastern Europe leapfrog over it,' notices
Almond.
Obama's visit is interesting for Armenia from the point of view of the
US role in fence-mending between Yerevan and Ankara. On the whole,
Barack Obama justified the Armenian hopes: not uttering the word
`genocide' he yet underlined that his position is unchanged and urged
Turkey to `reckon with its past'. Naturally, the border will be opened
neither on April 16, nor after April 24. Producers of the performance
`Normalization of Armenian-Turkish Relations' are now drawing up
various models of behavior for Yerevan, Ankara and Baku. The
«dress rehearsal», as usual, may end in nothing: they
will hold discussions, feel out each other's positions and leave it
till next football match, due in October. But much may occur in the
near future ` the expected meeting of Armenian and Azerbaijani
presidents at the summit of `Eastern Partnership', due in Prague on
May 7. In other words, once again everything rests on the regulation
of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, which, by value for Armenia, is
equal to the US recognition of the Armenian Genocide.
There exists also the Azeri factor, which not once has been dwelt on
in our analyses. In connection with Obama's visit to Istanbul, Baku
has started an unprecedented campaign for hindering the opening of the
Armenian-Turkish border. Letters, requirements ` everything is
used. Even Ilham Aliyev refused to attend the summit `Dialogue among
Civilizations'¦ In the words of Azeri political analyst Zardusht
Alizade, opening of border between Armenia and Turkey is the job of
two independent states, and Azerbaijan must not meddle with
it. Azerbaijan must herself solve her problems and the Karabakh
conflict in particular, and not ask it of Turkey. Opening of border
between Armenia and Turkey is the domestic affair of these countries,
where Azerbaijan is a third party and has nothing to do with opening
the border. `It is a bit difficult to give the precise date of opening
the border as it depends on the negotiation process between the two
countries,' Alizade said, Azeri media reports.
The Turkish opening to Armenia has potentially significant
implications for the balance of power in the Caucasus, says annual
report issued by Stratfor analytical center. `The August 2008
Russo-Georgian war created an unstable situation in an area of vital
importance to Russia. Inn this regard, normalization of relations
between Turkey and Armenia is of extreme importance. Armenians had
long held Turkey responsible for the mass murder of Armenians during
and after World War I, a charge the Turks have denied. The
U.S. Congress for several years has threatened to pass a resolution
condemning Turkish genocide against Armenians. The Turks are
extraordinarily sensitive to this charge, and passage would have meant
a break with the United States,' the report says in particular.
Even if we take into consideration the fact that Turkey is someway
moving away from America, trying to play her own role in the region
and also in the whole world, the US Congress' resolution on the
Armenian Genocide would really affect the balance in the region that
includes not only the Great Middle East, but also the Central Asia or,
to be more exact, the Turkic world. Armenia will appear in complete
isolation and will have to make concessions that may put the country
on the verge of existence. This is the worst scenario, but,
unfortunately, predictable.