Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Letters: Genocide Of The Circassians

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Letters: Genocide Of The Circassians

    GENOCIDE OF THE CIRCASSIANS
    David Hamilton

    Independent
    11 April 09
    UK

    Robert Fisk is, of course, right to keep reminding us about the
    Armenian genocide of 1915, which has left an indelible stain on the
    Young Turk government of Enver Pasha (report, 6 April). But he risks
    ungenerosity in dismissing as "usual weasal cliches" the statement
    by the White House security spokesman Mike Hammer that "the US can
    help Turkey and Armenia come to terms with the past".

    The Turks, no less than the Armenians, are just now awakening from a
    long nightmare of censored history. It should not be unduly offensive
    to Vladimir Putin, with his immaculate KGB credentials, to point out
    that the greatest crime of the later tsars, overshadowing all other
    pogroms, was the genocide of the Circassians or Cherkassians, in the
    1860s and 1870s. These people used to inhabit the Black Sea coastline
    between Georgia and the Crimea. The ethnic Abkhazians are a remnant.

    The Circassian masses that fled to the Ottoman Empire can only have
    been too relieved to be allowed to call themselves Turks, something
    no self-respecting Armenians or Kurds will ever allow themselves to
    be known as, in the same way the Welsh and Scots would never answer
    to being English.

    The Circassians were nomads, scarcely Muslim, profoundly pagan,
    and in considerable necessity. The problem of their resettlement
    was eventually solved by the Armenian genocide. Thus it was that the
    denial of one genocide created the conditions for the next.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X