Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey's Strategic Awakening

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turkey's Strategic Awakening

    Kurdish Aspect
    Aug 8 2009

    Turkey's Strategic Awakening

    Kurdishaspect.com - By Dr. Fariedun Hilmi



    Whether Prime Minister Erdugan reads the Kurdish internet media or not
    is not certain but what is certain is his apparent realisation that
    Turkey must go back to its Middle Eastern roots. What is striking is
    the similarity between his declared aims vis-Ã-vis the Kurds under
    his rule as well his attempts to make up with the Armenians
    demonstrating a shy apology without uttering the words and suggestions
    I made in an article published by me some five years ago. Furthermore,
    Erdugan has been busily seeking to open up his communication,
    commercial and political channels onto Turkey's erstwhile `Ottoman'
    colonies.

    As I say whether by reading the free Kurdish press published in the
    Diaspora or as a deep-thought realisation, Mr Erdugan has now started
    a grand awakening despite the traditional Kemalist opposition, to
    steering the country in a direction between Europe and its physical
    and historic environment and natural home which is a great piece of
    news for the entire group of nations in the Middle East not counting
    Israel.

    A number of years back I wrote about `Turkey's Strategic Blunder'
    pointing to the isolationism that was imposed on the Turkish nation by
    the Kemalist dinosaurs still believing that only racial purity can
    bring prosperity and glory and that the Turks who originated in
    eastern China some 800 years back and mixed with the Kurds, Greeks and
    Armenians producing generations of people who could only be called
    Turks because of the prevalence of the language during the Ottoman
    era, were now Europeans because many of them shared some racial
    characteristics with East Europeans and Aryans.

    Turkey, they thought, had built a great empire that lasted centuries,
    and the Turks were, therefore, superior to the other constituent
    nations that were instrumental in achieving, defending and maintaining
    that empire. Nevertheless the Kemalists believed that the lesser
    nations had to be eliminated or subjugated and pushed to the periphery
    in case they would be noticed by their `fellow' Europeans not
    realising that Western racism is not simply to do with race but
    cultural and religious as well and the Turks are culturally and
    religiously different despite all the paint and dyes used to convey a
    European look on them in a `Michael Jackson' fashion. This rather
    naive attitude by the Turks was extenuated and strengthened by the
    hypocritical way the western powers pretended to have come to rescue
    the subject minorities such as the Kurds and Armenians and even the
    Greeks all three of whom were duly sacrificed once they had served
    their purpose as negotiating cards to obtain the greatest benefits
    from the injured and dying empire.

    Those in Turkey with any foresight have realised that geographic
    positioning cannot be superficially altered and the constitution of a
    nation can only be radically or substantially changed through drastic,
    inhuman and aggressive actions which could not be tolerated and thus
    the only solution is to coexist with the Kurds, Greeks, Armenians, Laz
    and others. Furthermore, Turkey does not need to choose one or the
    other but can open up on all, inside and outside of its borders. This
    explains Mr Erdugan's efforts to keep good ties with Russia, Georgia,
    the Arab world Iran on the outside while seeking radical change and a
    rethink of the way his country had tried to solve the Kurdish problem
    inside.

    A new Turkey with the PKK playing their rightful role in leading its
    Kurdish territory under a single umbrella would be prosperous and
    powerful and I believe would create a good strong competition between
    the group of Kurds controlling the part under Iraq and those under
    Turkey. It is my belief that the Barzani and Talabani Cliques will not
    be able to carry on milking the retched nation's resources as they do
    at the moment because I am confident that those in Northern Kurdistan
    will serve their part and people selflessly and diligently and that
    would show up the south for all its corruption and deceptive
    practices.

    I advocate approaching the PKK because they have decided strategically
    to federate with Turkey and seem to be more tolerant of the Turks than
    any other. Furthermore they are a proper party whose members support
    it with their money and souls unlike the southern parties that only
    join to get paid by them becoming servants and staff of the party
    Aghas and `leaders' and therefore you expect the PKK to behave in a
    trusted and consistent manner whike the others will jump from the lap
    of one supporting government to the other.

    I would like to also point out that despite the billions of dollars
    that have been poured into Iraqi Kurdistan we are still miles and
    miles behind the Kurds in Turkey as far as progress and civilisation
    (development of civic law and institutions), and services. The only
    thing that is missing is the national rights of the Kurds even though
    many of those have recently been granted and I hope Erdugan will
    expand them and treat them as God-given rights and that will create
    complete trust and co-operation to go forward and develop the entire
    country.

    http://www.kurdishaspect.com/doc0 80809FH.html
Working...
X