Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Roadmap To Liberation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A Roadmap To Liberation

    A ROADMAP TO LIBERATION

    TamilNet
    11 August 2009

    What is currently seen as the biggest threat of destabilisation by
    Colombo and by some powers is not the militancy of Tamils. Militancy
    of a small nation can be crushed by ganging up and by fabricating
    all excuses, as has already been witnessed by us. But what exactly
    threatens the establishments is the effort of Tamils organising
    themselves politically. What they expect is the 'defeated' Tamils to
    play political stooges. Tamil national question today appeals to an
    array of oppressed masses deprived of political justice all over the
    world. It is a topic that appeals to progressive minds thinking of
    restructuring the polity of human civilisation. The responsibility
    of Eezham Tamils and their diaspora is to present the case with a
    progressive political theme and language.

    TamilNet Editorial Board Unfolding events, whether in war or
    in elections, clearly indicate that Sri Lanka, known for its
    state terrorism, is all out to subjugate Tamils militarily and
    politically. All Eezham Tamils in their heart are aware that they
    have no option other than facing the challenge.

    We live in times state terrorism in the island to the extent of
    multifaceted genocide is rationalised and is unashamedly blessed by
    the international community - from the UN, world powers and India to
    some other states in the region.

    All know well that the Sri Lankan state cannot bring in any solution
    other than escalating the conflict, but it seems this is what precisely
    they want that to happen, until the question 'who is going to have
    the geopolitical say in the island' is resolved among the powers.

    As such is the reality, it is folly to argue that things would have
    been different had the Tamil struggle opted a different course. There
    was no option between fighting and conceding to machinations of
    subjugation.

    What is currently seen as the biggest threat of destabilisation by
    Colombo and by some powers is not the militancy of Tamils. Militancy
    of a small nation can be crushed by ganging up and by fabricating
    all excuses, as has already been witnessed by us. But what exactly
    threatens the establishments is the effort of Tamils organising
    themselves politically. What they expect is the 'defeated' Tamils to
    play political stooges.

    Independent political organisation is a fundamental right of every
    society and is a vital norm of contemporary human civilisation.

    The responsibility of aptly asserting to this fundamental right falls
    squarely on every member of the Eezham Tamil nation. It is not just
    Tamils caring for themselves, but more than that, it is meeting a
    challenge of global perspective having a bearing to entire humanity.

    In a remarkable way the people of Jaffna have demonstrated their will
    for fresh political organisation in the recent municipal elections. It
    was a bold and clear boycott when only 20 percent turned out for
    voting- a slap in the face to all political parties, including the
    TNA that was playing words with 'self-determination.' In this instance
    no one instructed the people to boycott voting. It was spontaneous.

    As Lionel Bopage, a former general secretary of the JVP, has recently
    pointed out, the Sri Lankan state had long back disenfranchised the
    Eezham Tamils by enacting the 6th Amendment to the constitution in
    1983 that prevents them from politically airing their aspiration
    of nationhood.

    As political organisation of their choice is constitutionally prevented
    in the island, the onus righteously falls on the diaspora of Eezham
    Tamils to rise up to the occasion.

    Colombo is engaged in a dubious propaganda that diaspora's political
    organisation is harmful to its 'home made' solution that is nothing
    but structural genocide.

    In the highly internationalised conflict in the island, diaspora's
    political organisation is justifiable not only in voicing for the
    people facing genocide in the homeland but also in globally responding
    to the global system that failed in its political cum humanitarian
    values and humiliated the diaspora.

    The efforts of diaspora Tamils in re-affirming self-determination,
    independence and sovereignty proclaimed by the Vaddukkoaddai Resolution
    of 1976 and their novel concept of transnational governance for a
    nation victimised by the international community have become challenges
    worse than a war to Colombo.

    The Vaddukkoaddai Resolution was rebuked as 'Tamil tribalism' by a
    Sinhala writer, in a Colombo newspaper recently.

    "The Vaddukkoaddai war was a tragedy bought upon themselves by
    their intransient, self-defeating, short-sighted, Jaffna-centric
    extremism. Peninsular politics was never dominated or driven by
    any modern political ideology - liberalism, communism, socialism,
    multi-culturalism or even Gandhism which was a mere passing fad
    without any deep roots - other than primal communalism," says this
    writer in Daily Mirror, according to whom all progressive politics
    in the island come from the South.

    It is as though answering him Arundhati Roy wrote in her recent book:
    "I have always been struck by the fact that the political party in
    Turkey that carried out the Armenian genocide was called the Committee
    for Union and Progress."

    On the strategy of branding the aspirations of people, she further
    wrote: "This theft of language, this technique of usurping words and
    deploying them like weapons, of using them to mask intent and to mean
    exactly the opposite of what they have traditionally meant, has been
    one of the most brilliant strategic victories of the tsars of the new
    dispensation. It has allowed them to marginalise their detractors,
    deprive them of a language in which to voice their critique and dismiss
    them as being 'anti-progress', 'anti-development', 'anti-reform'
    and of course 'anti-national'-negativists of the worst sort."

    The Sri Lankan state, genetically impotent in forging a national
    polity for the island, had no limits in its duplicity in nullifying
    Tamil political organisation. Cultural pluralism is a convenient
    fad in some of the elite lips today to camouflage Colombo-centric
    capitalist greed. Pluralism has gone with the wind ever since colonial
    orientalism re-invented Mahavamsa to become the basis for the idea
    of state, forcing even leftists to betray their principles. Tamil
    political organisation was accused as Jaffna-centric while more than
    50 percent of the island's wealth is Colombo-centric. It was accused as
    caste-centric, replacing casteism with communalism, while no one other
    than belonging to a particular caste of Sinhalese could become a monk
    in the leading Buddhist chapters formidable in the island's polity.

    Responding to all sorts of challenges and evolving social inclusion,
    the polity of Tamils has irreversibly graduated into Tamil nationalism
    with local genius, thanks to state oppression, international
    victimisation and the course of militancy.

    Tamil national question today appeals to an array of oppressed masses
    deprived of political justice all over the world. It is a topic that
    appeals to progressive minds thinking of restructuring the polity of
    human civilisation.

    The responsibility of Eezham Tamils and their diaspora is to present
    the case with a progressive political theme and language.

    Lionel Bopage has hinted that Tamil militancy was only aiming to
    liberate the homeland from the occupying forces but it did not attempt
    to destabilise the Sri Lankan state. He says the old JVP was aiming
    at total destabilisation of the state.

    If properly structured, the political organisation of Tamil nationalism
    is sure to find congenial partnership with alternative Sinhala polity
    in destabilising the Sri Lankan state, is the view of some sections
    that see such a course a positive achievement to the island and to
    the world civilisation.

    Any successful political move doesn't come from negativism.

    There may be a thousand odd slips in the course of Tamil militancy
    that are now going to be exaggerated by the 'victorious' opponents
    to demoralise Tamils and to confirm subjugation.

    Tamils should carefully deduce and grasp in mind the theoretical,
    strategic and tactical drawbacks of the past, but these cannot be
    the cornerstones for political resurgence.

    Political resurgence comes from holding on to positive achievements.

    It should be clearly remembered that neither the war nor the cause
    of Ezham Tamils has ever been surrendered. A consensus is emerging
    now in the diaspora for its global unification as evidenced by the
    spontaneous moves for a number of global outfits. Above all, the
    most positive development is the awakening of the diaspora youth. The
    direct involvement of them in the protests of the last stage of war
    has given them an ownership of the struggle, enlightened them of the
    world they deal with and relieved them from myopia.

    The vital point to be kept in mind is that resurgence of Tamil
    politics should begin from the people, by the people and for the
    people. It cannot and should not begin from the intelligence agencies
    and embassies. Those days have gone and Tamils have seen enough of
    them. The rot should be kept far away until Tamils organise themselves.

    Some intelligence agencies in the West are said to be advising the
    diaspora youth to join Sinhala political parties than maintaining
    separate polity for Tamils. There is also a microscopic section
    in the diaspora believing in Rajapaksa remedy, even after seeing
    what has happened to people of the shade of opinion like Dayan
    Jayatillake. Tamils willingly finding fellowship with island-wide
    political parties can happen only with parties such as of Vikramabahu
    Karunaratne that are prepared to recognise Tamils as a nation in the
    island entitled to the right to self-determination.

    A lot of questions come about a democratically formed transnational
    government. TamilNet has already published a few articles on
    this, initiating the debate. As an alternative government having no
    territory, its power comes only from the will of people and its ability
    to do service. It cannot have any affiliation to any organisation.

    Transnational governance is not an elite exercise coming from the above
    and asking the people to vote. Such an exercise, when not orientated
    in the grass root, is always exposed to the danger of getting hijacked
    or succumbing to intimidation. But when it is formed with a clear
    bearing and mandate, through a series of democratic exercises among
    the diaspora in different parts of the world and if constituently
    linked from top to bottom, such a structure will be withstanding and
    cannot be ignored or sabotaged by anyone.

    It is essentially as a matter of proclamation of the will of Eezham
    Tamils to the international community and to set a firm bearing for the
    transnational governance, efforts of re-mandating the main principle
    of Vaddukkoaddai Resolution are being organized in the diaspora,
    in different parts of the world.

    The diaspora in Norway that has already re-mandated VR, with 99 percent
    assent in a 80 percent voter turn out is soon expected to experiment
    with an elected council for Eezham Tamils in Norway.

    In the process of people taking over Tamil polity, the society,
    especially the diaspora that is in a position to materialise it now,
    needs new blood of politicians and it goes without saying that the
    diaspora youth has a major role to play.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X