Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BAKU: Replacing US co-chair not mean change in Washington attitude

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BAKU: Replacing US co-chair not mean change in Washington attitude

    Trend, Azerbaijan
    Aug 14 2009

    Replacing U.S. co-chairman of OSCE MG not mean change in Washington's attitude towards conflict: MP

    Azerbaijan, Baku, Aug.14 / Trend News J. Babayeva /


    Deputy executive secretary of New Azerbaijan Party (NAP), MP Mubariz
    Gurbanli considers thatreplacing the U.S co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk
    Group does not mean change in Washington's attitude towards the
    Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

    "New U.S. diplomat will need certain time to study the
    conflict. However, there is an inherit principle in the
    diplomacy. Replacing the U.S. co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group does
    not mean that Washington's attitude towards the Armenian- Azerbaijani
    Nagorno-Karabakh conflict will change. The main factor in diplomacy is
    State interests," Gurbanli told NAP website.

    The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
    when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan
    lost all of Nagorno-Karabakh except for Shusha and Khojali in December
    1991. In 1992-93, Armenian armed forces occupied Shusha, Khojali and 7
    districts surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh. Azerbaijan and Armenia signed
    a ceasefire in 1994. The co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group - Russia,
    France, and the U.S. - are currently holding the peace negotiations.

    The media reported that diplomat Tina Kaidanow will replace Matthew
    Bryza, U.S. co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group.

    Armenia had a joy with the probability of appointment of Kaidanow, who
    was dealing with Kosova issue formerly.

    "Manipulating on the conflict, the invader Armenia informs that as
    though Kaidanow's appointment means that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
    will be resolved based on the Kosova model. It is wrong to draw
    analogy between the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and Kosovo. Because
    Kosovo was problem requiring different aspects of approach. The
    mediating countries in this problem did not mention the territorial
    integrity of Serbia. However, France, Russia and the U.S. have
    official positions on the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan," the MP
    said.
Working...
X