Tweet
THOSE DELIGHTED WITH EURONEWS
Hakob Badalyan
Lragir.am
02/12/09
For Armenian TV viewers, the December 1 evening was noteworthy from
the point that almost all the Armenian TV channels, as if by the same
order, "copied" and showed a EuroNews report on Nagorno-Karabakh where
the latter was said to be Armenian land, populated by Armenians and
overwhelmed with Armenian monuments and Bako Sahakyan, as subtitles
hinted, is the Karabakh president.
This report aroused unhidden admiration within the Armenian TV
channels. Some journalists covered the report as if Karabakh has been
again liberated. While, no one paid attention to a circumstance in
the report which perhaps was the most important one.
The EuroNews reporter informed, "From international point of
international rights, Nagorno-Karabakh belongs to Azerbaijan". What is
more important to write that Bako Sahakyan is the NKR president and
to consider Karabakh Armenian land or to affirm that from the point
of international right Nagorno-Karabakh belongs to Azerbaijan? For
Armenians, the most important seem to be the subtitles and Karabakh's
being Armenian land. Was that report supposed for Armenians? If it
was, everything is wonderful, if it was not, so what a foreign TV
viewer will think which unlike Armenians has more sensible attitude
towards the concept of right.
The very TV viewer judges from the point of rights. Right is justice
for them because foreign justice did not devaluate and mutate the
concept of right unlike the Armenia one. Consequently, even if the
EuroNews reporter swears and tells for half an hour that Karabakh is
Armenian land nevertheless, for foreign TV viewers the most important
will be the question who has rights on that territory. EuroNews gives
this right to Azerbaijan. Maybe we had better think a little before
the delight.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Hakob Badalyan
Lragir.am
02/12/09
For Armenian TV viewers, the December 1 evening was noteworthy from
the point that almost all the Armenian TV channels, as if by the same
order, "copied" and showed a EuroNews report on Nagorno-Karabakh where
the latter was said to be Armenian land, populated by Armenians and
overwhelmed with Armenian monuments and Bako Sahakyan, as subtitles
hinted, is the Karabakh president.
This report aroused unhidden admiration within the Armenian TV
channels. Some journalists covered the report as if Karabakh has been
again liberated. While, no one paid attention to a circumstance in
the report which perhaps was the most important one.
The EuroNews reporter informed, "From international point of
international rights, Nagorno-Karabakh belongs to Azerbaijan". What is
more important to write that Bako Sahakyan is the NKR president and
to consider Karabakh Armenian land or to affirm that from the point
of international right Nagorno-Karabakh belongs to Azerbaijan? For
Armenians, the most important seem to be the subtitles and Karabakh's
being Armenian land. Was that report supposed for Armenians? If it
was, everything is wonderful, if it was not, so what a foreign TV
viewer will think which unlike Armenians has more sensible attitude
towards the concept of right.
The very TV viewer judges from the point of rights. Right is justice
for them because foreign justice did not devaluate and mutate the
concept of right unlike the Armenia one. Consequently, even if the
EuroNews reporter swears and tells for half an hour that Karabakh is
Armenian land nevertheless, for foreign TV viewers the most important
will be the question who has rights on that territory. EuroNews gives
this right to Azerbaijan. Maybe we had better think a little before
the delight.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress