Tweet
news.az, Azerbaijan
Dec 20 2009
Money allocated by the U.S. Congress to Nagorno Karabakh will not be spent
Sun 20 December 2009 | 10:27 GMT Text size:
APA interviews Professor of the Johns Hopkins University Frederick Starr.
How can the decision of the U.S. Congress on allocating direct aid to
Nagorno Karabakh influence Azerbaijan-US relations?
I think it was an unfortunate mistake. It is important to make a
distinction between an allocation by congressional vote and actual
expenditure of the money. My guess is that the money will not be
spent. This was a gesture made under pressure from Armenian lobbies.
We will find ways of not acting on this.
But it is not the first time when the Congress passes such decisions¦
And often they are reversed in action. Even though I regret it and
consider it a mistake I believe that the administration should
intervene to prevent it. Having said that I do not think it is going
to actually be spent and I think it will be neutralized.
How can this fact impact on the negotiations on the resolution of
Nagorno Karabakh conflict? Taking into account that US is one of the
co-chairs of OSCE Minsk Group.
I do not think it will impact on the negotiation process. I think this
small and insignificant gesture has no meaning at all, it will not
affect the Minsk process.
Many experts said that the Nagorno Karabakh conflict could be solved
this year. But unfortunately, it did not happen. What are your
forecasts concerning it?
I believe that Azerbaijan's diplomacy in 2009 has been very effective.
There have been unfortunate initiatives during this time which seem to
push Karabakh into the background and by very patient and yet very
firm measures President Ilham Aliyev and Foreign Minister Mammadyarov
have effectively reminded the world that this question will not
disappear and I think in 2010 there will be much greater clarity than
there was in 2009. Does this mean that there will be a solution in
2010? I think we do not know the answer. Anyone of goodwill hopes very
much there will be and hopes that 900,000 citizens of Azerbaijan can
start making plans to return to their homes.
How do you assess Turkey's role in this process? We would like to know
your forecasts concerning the protocols signed between Turkey and
Armenia.
Turkey's role has shifted dramatically from month to month. But I
think the consistent element is that Turkey having had problems with
its relations with Europe is now seeking a new role for itself in the
South Caucasus and dreams somehow of becoming a part of outside force
in the region. My personal impression is that the Caucasus does not
need more outside forces, it needs stronger inside forces and security
in the Caucasus can be generated from within.
APA
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Dec 20 2009
Money allocated by the U.S. Congress to Nagorno Karabakh will not be spent
Sun 20 December 2009 | 10:27 GMT Text size:
APA interviews Professor of the Johns Hopkins University Frederick Starr.
How can the decision of the U.S. Congress on allocating direct aid to
Nagorno Karabakh influence Azerbaijan-US relations?
I think it was an unfortunate mistake. It is important to make a
distinction between an allocation by congressional vote and actual
expenditure of the money. My guess is that the money will not be
spent. This was a gesture made under pressure from Armenian lobbies.
We will find ways of not acting on this.
But it is not the first time when the Congress passes such decisions¦
And often they are reversed in action. Even though I regret it and
consider it a mistake I believe that the administration should
intervene to prevent it. Having said that I do not think it is going
to actually be spent and I think it will be neutralized.
How can this fact impact on the negotiations on the resolution of
Nagorno Karabakh conflict? Taking into account that US is one of the
co-chairs of OSCE Minsk Group.
I do not think it will impact on the negotiation process. I think this
small and insignificant gesture has no meaning at all, it will not
affect the Minsk process.
Many experts said that the Nagorno Karabakh conflict could be solved
this year. But unfortunately, it did not happen. What are your
forecasts concerning it?
I believe that Azerbaijan's diplomacy in 2009 has been very effective.
There have been unfortunate initiatives during this time which seem to
push Karabakh into the background and by very patient and yet very
firm measures President Ilham Aliyev and Foreign Minister Mammadyarov
have effectively reminded the world that this question will not
disappear and I think in 2010 there will be much greater clarity than
there was in 2009. Does this mean that there will be a solution in
2010? I think we do not know the answer. Anyone of goodwill hopes very
much there will be and hopes that 900,000 citizens of Azerbaijan can
start making plans to return to their homes.
How do you assess Turkey's role in this process? We would like to know
your forecasts concerning the protocols signed between Turkey and
Armenia.
Turkey's role has shifted dramatically from month to month. But I
think the consistent element is that Turkey having had problems with
its relations with Europe is now seeking a new role for itself in the
South Caucasus and dreams somehow of becoming a part of outside force
in the region. My personal impression is that the Caucasus does not
need more outside forces, it needs stronger inside forces and security
in the Caucasus can be generated from within.
APA
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress