Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Book Review: Passion in the Desert

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Book Review: Passion in the Desert

    The New York Times
    January 18, 2009 Sunday
    Late Edition - Final



    Passion in the Desert

    Reviewed by CHRISTOPHER de BELLAIGUE.

    Christopher de Bellaigue's new book, ''Rebel Land: Among Turkey's
    Forgotten Peoples,'' will be published next fall.

    LAND OF MARVELS
    By Barry Unsworth
    287 pp. Nan A. Talese/Doubleday. $26

    Like the ancient mound its British protagonist excavates in
    Ottoman-run Mesopotamia on the eve of World War I, Barry Unsworth's
    new novel is made up of layers. First, there are the remains of
    long-lost empires, lying compacted under the archaeologist John
    Somerville's feet. Over that Unsworth places contemporary terrors, for
    Somerville the student of the past is beset by the realities of the
    present -- not only the possibility of conflict between a new
    generation of imperialists, but also by oil prospectors and railway
    planners who see the land he is digging up as a source of wealth, not
    knowledge. Unsworth's 21st-century readers inhabit a third stratum. We
    read ''Land of Marvels'' exquisitely aware that the great American
    empire entered its own crisis as a result of its occupation of the
    vast territory where Somerville is digging, to which Unsworth affixes
    its modern name only when tapping out the book's last, portentous
    word: Iraq.

    The suggestion here of history as an irresistible cycle, raising
    nations only to consign them to oblivion, is essential to Unsworth's
    knowing, detached brand of historical fiction. Occasionally in ''Land
    of Marvels'' a character muses rather too obviously about the
    transience of imperial might, or a history lesson is inserted into a
    section of dialogue to the disadvantage of both. Generally, however,
    Unsworth assembles his layers with the subtlety you would expect from
    a renowned, if restrained, historical novelist and Booker Prize
    winner. When a young woman named Patricia, who has joined Somerville's
    expedition fresh out of Cambridge, rues the ''contrary spirit of
    dismemberment'' that threatens the archaeologists, who are trying to
    ''put things together, make sense of things, add to the sense of human
    community,'' her sentiment soars above the narrative. We see these
    interlopers and the other Westerners who surround them as frozen
    between the past and the future and between two instincts: to preserve
    what one has discovered under the sands or to unleash a destructive
    energy that may, even in its terrible crucible, have regenerative
    power.

    Unsworth puts the second argument in the mouth of Alex Elliott, a
    young American geologist: tall, tanned, easy on the eye. Attaching
    himself to Somerville, who naively expects support from Elliott's
    backer, the financier Lord Rampling, the American passes himself off
    to the Ottomans as an archaeologist, while in fact he is prospecting
    for oil. Disenchanted by her husband's obsessive quest for the
    archaeological find that will make his career and riled by the
    precocious Fabianism of young Patricia and her new fiance, a cuneiform
    expert named Palmer, Somerville's wife, Edith, is enthralled by
    Elliott's apparently guileless passion for oil. It's like a ''genie,''
    he tells her, trapped inside the earth, whose release ''will bring
    prosperity and ease of life to millions of people. . . . He will light
    their lamps, warm their houses, drive their engines. This genie will
    be the harbinger of a golden age.''

    Unsworth repeatedly uses fire to suggest both passion and death. When
    Elliott seduces Edith, it is by the flickering, hallucinatory light of
    flaring gas in the middle of the desert: ''His arms were around her
    and she still saw the fire through closed eyes, and the beauty of the
    fire was in everything she felt and did.''

    While Elliott and Somerville tramp about in search of their respective
    treasures, and the Englishman frets over the railway line the Germans
    are laying in the direction of his dig, threatening to obliterate
    everything in its path, an expanding cast of characters gathers for
    luncheon and tea around the Somervilles' table. Already charged with
    the intensity of Edith's feelings toward her husband and her lover,
    these rituals get still edgier when Lord Rampling, cutting deals in
    Damascus, discovers that Elliott has been in contact with the rival
    Deutsche Bank. Incensed, Rampling deputes a British spy, Major
    Manning, to kill Elliott -- but only after the American has committed
    his findings to paper.

    In a fitting plot twist, Manning has a rival, the gnomic Spahl, a
    Deutsche Bank agent who is similarly concerned about Elliott's divided
    loyalties. But both are upstaged by a priceless pair of Swedish
    missionaries who plan to open a luxury hotel on the very place, quite
    near the excavated hill, that the Society for Biblical Research has
    determined to be the original site of the Garden of Eden, and whose
    idea of dinner table conversation is to predict a rain of fire and
    brimstone on modern-day sinners.

    Amid the tension, and some deft characterization -- Edith's
    exasperation at Patricia and Palmer is especially well done --
    Unsworth's themes of extraction and exploitation are
    irresistible. Somerville is fired by the spirit of an actual
    historical figure, Sir Austen Henry Layard, the Victorian adventurer
    and diplomat who excavated the sites of ancient Nimrud and Nineveh
    and, in the process, amassed the British Museum's priceless Assyrian
    collection. But the comparison does not flatter Somerville. Layard
    loved the Near East, where he put himself through countless perils and
    made fast friendships. Somerville, by contrast, finds no joy in his
    environment and longs only for the applause of the Royal Society back
    in London. It's a pity that Unsworth's only local character of note,
    the duplicitous hireling Jehar,lies flat on the page next to the
    book's Western characters.

    Lord Rampling is a much fuller beast: rich, virile and indecently
    cosmopolitan, living in luxury in Constantinople and London, an
    embodiment of the sense of boundless opportunity that fires global
    capitalism and a brother in literature to the fabulously wealthy
    real-life oil magnate Calouste Gulbenkian. Born in Constantinople of
    Armenian ancestry, educated in Britain, Gulbenkian helped set up Royal
    Dutch/Shell and was a prime mover behind attempts to exploit Ottoman
    oil fields.

    The early summer of 1914, when the novel's action takes place, is the
    last outing for what Edith Somerville endearingly calls
    ''splendidness,'' a strikingly Victorian combination of ''power and
    strength and passionate certainty,'' before Europe is plunged into
    darkness.

    Unsworth's denouement is dramatic and richly symbolic, if rather
    abrupt. And, as is only to be expected, it involves an incendiary
    meeting of the railway project, the dig and the as-yet-untapped oil
    fields. Unsworth's description of the conflagration that ensues, a
    river of fire ''stinking and shrieking'' and consuming everything in
    its path, brings to mind the fire and brimstone of the book of
    Genesis, the burning oil fields after the 1991 gulf war, the seemingly
    ever-present images of the charred remains of Iraqi civilians on the
    television news. In ''Land of Marvels'' -- and particularly in this
    final scene -- Unsworth succeeds in summoning the demons and the
    angels of Iraq's present and past. Not bad for a volume you could read
    in an afternoon.
Working...
X