Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: The fall from building solidarity to cheap commercialization

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: The fall from building solidarity to cheap commercialization

    Today's Zaman, Turkey
    Jan 18 2009


    `Hepimiz': The fall from building solidarity to cheap commercialization


    The ridiculous headline "Hepimiz Keviniz" (We are all Kevin),
    broadcast by Star news on the announcement and arrival of Kevin
    Costner as the figurehead of Turkish Airlines' (THY) new first-class
    service, has been viewed as a gross and thoughtless misappropriation
    of a serious slogan chosen by Turks to express their sympathy for
    persecuted people both nationally and internationally.

    The phrase "Hepimiz" (All of us) was made popular after the
    assassination of journalist Hrant Dink in January 2007. Dink was a
    talented writer, and as an Armenian with great faith in the Turkish
    people, he spent his life working to create an environment of
    tolerance and love that would accept him and others like him who did
    not fit into the state's narrow definition of "Turkishness." When his
    murderer, Ogün Samast, a 16-year-old, ran from the scene
    shouting "I have killed the gavur [foreigner or non-Muslim]," the
    nation responded with an outburst of shame. The streets were flooded
    with people and signs all defiantly proclaiming the same message,
    "Hepimiz Hrant'ız, hepimiz Ermeniyiz" (We are all Hrant, we are
    all Armenian).

    Since then, the slogan has become a byword for grassroots movements
    defending human rights, free speech, equality, feminism and
    anti-racism. In 2008 when Italian peace activist Pippa Bacca was
    murdered while hitchhiking across Turkey in a symbolic bridal gown,
    her death was commemorated by those who mourned the abuse of her
    innocence and hope and by women's groups protesting her rape and
    murder with the words "Hepimiz Pippa'yız." The slogan made its
    first appearance of 2009 at the opening night party of the film "The
    Queen at the Factory." Hande Yener, the oft-touted Madonna of Turkish
    pop, stars in the film, which revolves around a brother's inability to
    accept his sister's homosexuality; she started the party by announcing
    "Hepimiz Gay'iz." The most recent example of the use of this phrase
    was in response to the savage attacks on Gaza, which have prompted
    marches in Turkey under the banner "Hepimiz Filistinliyiz" (We are all
    Palestinians).

    When it first arrived, the slogan was all encompassing; it seemed on a
    par with John F. Kennedy's "Ich bin ein Berliner" or the French
    response to Sept. 11, "Nous sommes tous Americains." After generations
    of widespread distrust and dislike between Turks and Armenians, some
    felt it was an important watershed in the language and symbolism
    between the two ethnic groups, something that Dink himself would have
    applauded. Indeed the phrase did start with that spirit of
    anti-racism. The man who made the first black and white sign and was
    responsible for running the headline on the front page of the widely
    read Nokta news magazine, journalist Alaz Kuseyri, was inspired by
    something he had seen two weeks earlier. At a soccer match in
    Ä°stanbul, he watched fans of BeÅ?iktaÅ? player
    Pascal Nouma hang signs around the stadium that said "Hepimiz
    zenciyiz" (We are all black).

    The Hepimiz movement is a small but encouraging sign in a country that
    has no specialized national body to combat racism and few NGOs to fill
    that gap. According to conservatives, there is no race problem --
    there are only economic, political or social problems. Liberals think
    differently, and recent legislation put in place under the watchful
    eye of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI)
    is a step in the right direction.

    School textbooks are being evaluated to remove negative views of some
    minority groups, especially Armenians. Judges and prosecutors have
    since 2003 undergone special training on the European Convention on
    Human Rights. The criminal code adopted in 2004 calls for a jail
    sentence of up to one year for anyone who discriminates on the grounds
    of language, race, color or religion in the area of employment or
    access to public services. There have been modifications to the
    notorious Associations Act, which banned organizations based on the
    assertion of differences whether they be of class, race, language or
    religion. The same act now prohibits associations whose purpose is to
    "create forms of discrimination on the grounds of race, religion, sect
    or region"; however, it still maintains the oppressive ban on those
    who "create minorities on these grounds and destroy the unitary
    structure of the Republic of Turkey." But how is one to truly
    differentiate between an organization that claims a minority exists
    and one whose purpose is to create a minority?

    Optimists, like Dink, like to believe that the citizens of modern
    Turkey are the inheritors of the multiethnic, multicultural and
    multilingual rainbow that was the Ottoman Empire. They think that each
    separate ethnic group can be a tributary flowing into the broad fluid
    stream of Turkish consciousness, but this seems unlikely in the short
    to medium term. Only weeks after Dink's death, the "Hepimiz" that
    surrounded his murder became divided; once the initial shock had
    passed, it seemed most people were happy to be Hrant but not happy to
    be Armenian. The head of the right-wing Nationalist Movement Party
    (MHP) echoed many thoughts when, after Dink's funeral, he said: "What
    does that mean? We are all Turks, we are all Mehmets [Turkish
    soldiers]."

    In the 2005 ECRI report on Turkey, the most common complaint was that
    while Turkey talked the talk (i.e., made the legislation), she failed
    to walk the walk. Though the report recognized that "changing
    attitudes is a much slower process than changing the law," it
    specifically commented that there had been delays in implementing
    reforms and that administrative and judicial authorities often
    deliberately expressed an attitude contrary to new anti-discriminatory
    provisions. Television stations such as Star, instead of belittling a
    hopeful idea of unity by appending it to a Hollywood has-been, would
    do well to promote it and the multicultural ideas that lie behind
    it. Turkey's future mental and political health depends on new
    definitions of inclusiveness, and Hepimiz is as good a start as any.


    18 January 2009, Sunday
    FEZÄ°LE ZAHÄ°R MUÄ?LA
Working...
X