Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vulgarity Versus Political Debate

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vulgarity Versus Political Debate

    VULGARITY VERSUS POLITICAL DEBATE

    The Civilitas Foundation
    Thursday, 02 July 2009 10:02

    The political debate that should have taken place over whether and how
    Armenia's delegation to the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly
    can and should interact with the delegations of Azerbaijan and Turkey
    has not taken place. Instead, we have been witness to inappropriate -
    that's a polite way of saying vulgar and insulting - assessments of
    the Armenian parliamentarian involved.

    One wonders if a male parliamentarian had sought the support of
    Turkish and Azerbaijani parliamentarians on a resolution regarding
    Armenia's domestic issues, how would the political elite have reacted?

    Parliamentarian Zaruhi Postanjian is a woman, a member of the
    Zharangutyun (Heritage) party and a vocal, committed human rights
    advocate. Her political steps can be debated. Her personal life,
    patriotism and gender ought not.

    It is at our peril that Armenia avoids political debate, sidesteps
    real discussion about the ever-tightening political situation in our
    region, especially vis-a-vis Armenia's neighbors. Offending those
    whose domestic policies are different, drawing fezzes on the heads
    of those whose policies towards our neighbors is perceived as too
    tolerant -- all this means foregoing political consensus in favor of
    imposed policy. There are social implications, too. Striking at the
    dignity of half of=2 0Armenia's population means women and girls will
    be even less willing and prepared to help build a country.

    All because we refuse to get involved in the hard work of debating
    policy and articulating our vision of our future.
Working...
X