Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

There Is Essential Difference Between Statements Of Baku And Madrid

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • There Is Essential Difference Between Statements Of Baku And Madrid

    THERE IS ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN STATEMENTS OF BAKU AND MADRID PRINCIPLES ISSUED: DEPUTY FM OF ARMENIA

    ArmInfo
    2009-07-14 14:10:00

    ArmInfo. There is an essential difference between the statements
    of official Baku and the Madrid principles issued, deputy Foreign
    Minister of Armenia Shavarsh Kocharyan said in an interview with PTA.

    'In particular, the Azerbaijani president and foreign minister claimed
    that the status of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic will be determined
    by Azerbaijan only. As a result, a panic started in Azerbaijan
    caused by the fact that its authorities actually misinformed the
    society regarding the on-going negotiations. In particular, it denied
    availability of the "Madrid document", around which it agreed to hold
    negotiations, for almost a year', he said.

    According to S. Kocharyan, Baku realizes that the existing document
    means that Azerbaijan undertakes to admit what has become a reality
    far ago, namely, the Nagorno Karabakh Republic has actually no relation
    to Azerbaijan, it is independent and sovereign, and Azerbaijan admits
    by these provisions that it has no authorities with respect to the NKR.

    To note, the OSCE site reports that the presidents of OSCE
    MG co-chair-countries made a joint statement on the Nagorno
    Karabakh Conflict at the L'Aquila Summit of the Eight, July 10,
    2009. The statement says that the Basic Principles reflect a
    reasonable compromise based on the Helsinki Final Act principles
    of Non-Use of Force, Territorial Integrity, and the Equal Rights
    and Self-Determination of Peoples. The Basic Principles include, in
    particular: return of the territories surrounding Nagorno- Karabakh to
    Azerbaijani control; an interim status for Nagorno-Karabakh providing
    guarantees for security and self-governance; a corridor linking Armenia
    to Nagorno- Karabakh; future determination of the final legal status
    of Nagorno-Karabakh through a legally binding expression of will;
    the right of all internally displaced persons and refugees to return
    to their former places of residence; and international security
    guarantees that would include a peacekeeping operation.
Working...
X