Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Caught in the Light: Karsh Placed Subjects on Rightful Pedestals

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Caught in the Light: Karsh Placed Subjects on Rightful Pedestals

    The Washington Post
    July 26, 2009 Sunday
    Every Edition

    Caught in the Light;
    Yousuf Karsh Placed His Subjects on Their Rightful Pedestals

    by Sarah Kaufman; Washington Post Staff Writer


    Pick your dreary image: It's a holding cell, a decompression chamber,
    a place so formidably austere you'd think no fantasies could ever form
    there. But however grim the small, darkened gallery at the Canadian
    Embassy appears, walk around the 28 photographs by Yousuf Karsh on
    display in "Karsh at 100: Portraits of Artists," and you'll find that
    the space feels more like a sculpture garden.

    It's a garden of heroes. Sculpted from shadows and reverence and, when
    needed, just the right prop -- a half-smoked cigarette or, in the case
    of Andy Warhol, a house-painting brush with bristles as glossy as his
    own pale comb-over. Light is their enemy, so the room is dimmer even
    than its battleship-gray walls. But time has been kind to these
    faces. Karsh, who died in 2002 at 93, photographed them up to 60 years
    ago, when folks believed in heroes. There is no irony here. Instead,
    there is lyrical idealization. These photos memorialize our
    mid-century faith in the nobility of art, and in the goodness of
    greatness.

    Karsh, an Armenian emigre who lived most of his life in Ottawa, made
    pictures the way the old sportswriters used to ply their trade,
    mythologizing and storytelling Babe Ruth and Joe DiMaggio right up
    onto their pedestals. Don't God up the ballplayers! legendary sports
    editor Stanley Woodward used to say, pressing for a more nuanced and
    honest approach. But what does a little well-placed puffery hurt? From
    Winston Churchill (his first great portrait) to Bill Clinton, Karsh
    Godded up his subjects, none more so than the artists in this show.

    Take Joan Crawford. Cigarette dangling from one hand? Check. Padded
    shoulders? Check. And the dark lipstick, the glamorous wrap, every
    fingernail filed to a point and as polished as a Pontiac. With that
    waxy full mouth and agate-hard eyes, her face an unlined mask -- no
    smoker's creases, no smile lines -- she looks just as untouchable and
    unblemished as her public wished her to be. In 1948, nobody wanted to
    know Mommie Dearest's secrets. Here, she is more than a movie star --
    she is the entirety of what the fan magazines were selling back then,
    the Hollywood dream with a bungalow on the lot and Frank Sinatra on
    the dial and nervous assistants bringing coffee. Karsh packaged
    Crawford as a lifestyle.

    Karsh's portraits seem so much like sculpture not only because of
    their mythic contexts but also because of their textures, the contours
    and solidity of illuminated bone structure. He brings out the
    weightedness of these faces, and turns it into moral weight. Marian
    Anderson gazes just over our shoulder. It's 1945, and she's the black
    Madonna, patience and trials writ in her eyes, looking beyond our
    sins. That velvet skin whose color figured in a national uproar is the
    story here, lighted by Karsh to glow as if from within -- but not to
    glisten. She's cool, flawlessly matte, neither wary nor
    judgmental. The slopes and planes of her face -- the biggest close-up
    in the room -- have a solemn majesty that echoes the grandeur of that
    voice.

    Some of the portraits are less face, more drama. François Mauriac is
    captured in profile, but the French novelist's features are dark,
    limned in a thin glow as if he were in partial solar eclipse. The back
    story is that Paris was experiencing a power outage on this day in
    1949; the fading afternoon sun was all Karsh had to work with. The
    light traces Mauriac's silhouette as if it were a curl of smoke from a
    Gauloise, drifting around his high intellectual forehead and
    double-humped nose, his little brushy mustache and those drawn-in
    lips, made tight, one supposes, from all those frontal Gallic vowels
    in overuse.

    Martha Graham is one of the few full-torso photographs, though she,
    too, is mostly in profile. Like Crawford's, her broad-planed face
    resembles an impenetrable mask, but it's not a pose; it's held in
    listening, inner-directed stillness. All the tension is in her
    muscular fingertips. (An interesting detail to capture, from a dancer
    -- one that a lesser photographer might overlook. But Karsh was famous
    for the attention he paid to hands.) She's sacred above, profane
    below, as the serpentine arrangement of her body hints, the way her
    hip slides away from her spine, the pronounced curve of her breast. A
    difficult, tempestuous drinker? Not this Martha. This is the
    discipline-hard goddess.

    She and Georgia O'Keeffe are soul mates, at least to Karsh. O'Keeffe
    in her desert studio is staged like a cutout in one of Joseph
    Cornell's boxes, like a little work of theater: She's in her
    spinster's black dress, her fingers curved just so, like the
    wind-twisted hunk of tree at her side. There's a steer skull hanging
    overhead; the New Mexican strata can be spied through the rough-hewn
    doorway. The composition is an assemblage of all the familiar O'Keeffe
    totems. Everything looks so dry, you can almost feel the dust in your
    mouth. Of course, O'Keeffe's paintings gorged on life -- those fat
    flowers, the rich, joyous colors. Sensuality written all over
    them. But Karsh frames the artist as an ascetic, exactly as we'd
    imagine her to be, serving her muse in that hard-baked landscape.

    That's the reality of Karsh's work. If you're looking for penetrating
    insights, you won't find them here. He states the obvious. He does it
    beautifully. He states the obvious better than anybody else working
    with big names in luxuriantly silver-rich paper. (Even if Mies van der
    Rohe contemplating triangles seems much too obvious.) There's
    Hemingway in Havana, turtlenecked (in the tropics? But it's a dandy
    sweater, gorgeous suede front), weathered and a bit tortured around
    those dark eyes. There's Henry Moore, shoulder to shoulder with one of
    his marble sculptures, which itself looks a little like a
    self-portrait, its bulges echoing his strong nose and cheekbones. A
    grandfatherly Picasso still looks boyish and playful, as if he's got
    something up the crisp, creased sleeve of his new shirt.

    Christian Dior, half-hidden in shadow, looks past us in silent
    judgment, finger to his lips, one brow cocked above an appraising
    eye. He's just this side of stern; he looks like he might just approve
    -- and secretly, of course, we imagine he would approve if that eye
    flicked in our direction. Karsh knows we'd like to think this, and he
    gives us the Dior of our dreams.

    Karsh dealt in dreams. It seems like an old-fashioned attribute,
    now. We don't see the famous this way anymore -- serene, knowing and
    pearlescent -- and what celebrity today could pose so
    unself-consciously heroically as Anderson, or Crawford? But so it was
    once upon a time, when we put our hearts in DiMaggio's hands and he
    lifted a nation with his hitting streak; when we put our faith in
    Walter Cronkite (whom Karsh also photographed, though that portrait is
    not in this show), and he told us the way it was; and we put our
    heroes under Karsh's lights and he gave them back to us, strong,
    perfect and immortal. That was the way we needed it to be, in our
    imagination as well as his.

    Karsh at 100: Portraits of Artists, closes Dec. 18. At the Embassy of
    Canada, 501 Pennsylvania Ave. NW. Open to the public from 9 a.m. to 5
    p.m. weekdays.
Working...
X