Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenian Patriarch Of Turkey: Religious Or Political Leader?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armenian Patriarch Of Turkey: Religious Or Political Leader?

    ARMENIAN PATRIARCH OF TURKEY: RELIGIOUS OR POLITICAL LEADER?
    By Harut Sassounian

    Asbarez
    www.asbarez.info/2009/05/08/ar menian-patriarch-of-turkey-religious-or-political- leader/
    May 8th, 2009

    year ago, the 53-year-old Patriarch of Turkey, Mesrob Mutafyan, was
    unexpectedly diagnosed with a debilitating and apparently incurable
    illness. His official duties were assumed on a temporary basis by
    Archbishop Aram Ateshian, 55, and Archbishop Shahan Svajian, 83.

    There have been many puzzling questions as to the cause of the
    Patriarch's illness. His doctors have announced that he is suffering
    from an unspecified neurological disorder and loss of memory.

    Members of the Istanbul Armenian community have expressed conflicting
    opinions as to the advisability of replacing the Patriarch. Electing
    a replacement is problematic, as Patriarchs usually serve for
    life. However, such an important seat cannot remain vacant for
    long. Patriarch Mutafyan was elected to his post in 1998.

    There are only about 10 Armenian clergymen worldwide who qualify to
    stand as candidates in a new patriarchal election, since Turkish law
    disqualifies those not born in that country. Two of the 10 clergymen
    reside in Istanbul, while the rest are in Armenia, the United States
    and Germany.

    Since Archbishop Atesyan has already taken on many of the patriarchal
    duties, he may emerge as the front-runner in a future election for
    that post. It is therefore important for the Armenian public to be
    informed about his background, actions and statements.

    In previous patriarchal elections, the Turkish government has indicated
    to the local Armenian community its preferred candidate. An early
    indication of such a preference would be the number of times a
    particular clergyman is invited to Ankara for "consultation."

    To gain insight into Abp. Atesyan's positions on Armenian-Turkish
    issues, here are several excerpts from his lengthy interview with
    Spiegel online, the electronic version of the prominent German Der
    Spiegel magazine.

    The interview was conducted shortly after the Armenian clergyman, along
    with the Jewish Rabbi, the Patriarchal Vicar of the Syriac Orthodox
    Church, and the Islamic Mufti of Istanbul met with Pres. Obama in
    Istanbul last month. The Greek Patriarch met separately with the
    U.S. President.

    Abp. Atesyan told Spiegel that he "spoke with Pres. Obama about the
    events of 1915 and told him that both peoples suffered." He also the
    President: "We, the Armenians in Turkey, are like the children of a
    divorce. In Turkish, we call our homeland 'Anavatan' - that means
    'motherland' - and in Armenian we call it 'Hayrenik,' which means
    'fatherland.' We have lived with our mother for the past 80 years. Now
    we want our parents to finally reconcile."

    Commenting on Pres. Obama's April 24 statement, Abp. Atesyan said:
    "The Turkish government is unhappy that the US president used the term
    'Meds Yeghern,' the 'Great Catastrophe.' That is the common Armenian
    name for the events of 1915 and basically means the same thing. But
    there is also some disappointment among Armenians. Many wished that
    he would specifically use the G-word. But of course he did not. The
    US needs Turkey, it is one of its most important strategic partners."

    Abp. Atesyan proceeded to explain that "Armenians have been living on
    Anatolian soil for the past 2,000 years, and for the last thousand we
    have shared this land with the Turks. Our people were like brothers -
    until the tragic events of 1915. Now there is hope once again, but
    we should not gamble it away. Therefore the next step is diplomatic
    rapprochement between Turkey and Armenia, followed by the opening of
    common borders."

    Interestingly, he dismissed the much talked about possible formation
    of a "historical commission," by asserting that "a closer examination
    of our history will not be attempted for the time being."

    When asked about the Armenian Diaspora's demands for genocide
    recognition, Abp. Atesyan responded very cautiously: "I do not want
    to judge them. I do not want to judge anyone. I am a member of the
    clergy, it's not my responsibility to conduct historical research or
    raise questions of guilt. The only thing I want to say to my Turkish
    and Armenian counterparts is: We know that something very terrible
    happened to my people in 1915.

    We also know that Turks and Muslims suffered. And we know that today
    there is a chance for our people to engage with each other."

    Abp. Atesyan then commented on recent developments in Turkey: "Yes,
    there is certainly a change of mentality in Turkey. Ten years ago,
    no one would have had the courage to ask questions about the events
    of 1915. This fear has receded; today one can write about the issue
    or discuss it on television. In comparison to the 1990s, human rights
    in this country have made a big leap forward. This also affects our
    ability to practice our religion. We are now in a position to freely
    renovate our churches. Until recently, we had to ask permission from
    the government for each new nail.... It is an unwritten law in this
    country that a Christian can never be a government minister or a
    military officer. But I believe that this could change in the future.

    The problem in giving such interviews is that Armenian clergymen in
    Turkey have to be extremely careful about what they say publicly,
    given that country's draconian laws restricting freedom of speech. One
    wrong word can land them in jail or worse! In his case, Abp. Atesyan
    has an even more compelling reason for minding his words. He could
    either ingratiate himself to the Turkish authorities or have them
    veto his patriarchal candidacy.

    The wisest course for an Armenian clergyman in Turkey is to deal
    exclusively with religious issues and not discuss politics, thus
    avoiding the possibility of being used as a propaganda tool for the
    Turkish government.
Working...
X