Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Book Review: Spark that consumed a nation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Book Review: Spark that consumed a nation

    Weekend Australian
    May 30, 2009 Saturday
    5 - All-round Review Edition


    Spark that consumed a nation

    by Richard Morrison

    SECTION: REVIEW; Pg. 16

    A new book reveals the tragic cost of Adolf Hitler's first big
    propaganda success, writes Richard Morrison

    BY midnight on that startling evening, the flames from the bonfires
    were leaping 9m into the air. Thousands had gathered to watch the
    spectacle. Joseph Goebbels had already spoken, proclaiming the end of
    ``the age of exaggerated Jewish intellectualism''. But still the books
    burned, thousands of them. And not just on the Opernplatz in Berlin
    but in cities across Germany. By the end of the night a nation had
    voluntarily consigned to the flames the best works of its finest
    living writers.

    The date -- May 10, 1933 -- is now as infamous in the annals of Nazi
    tyranny as the Night of the Long Knives the following year or
    Kristallnacht in 1938. All are seen as symbolic and horrific
    milestones on the road to genocide. But who chose the authors whose
    books were to be so publicly burned and whose reputations were
    instantaneously trashed? Why were some pro-Nazi writers included? And
    what became of the authors in the aftermath?

    Until now, the answers have been sketchy at best. But a gripping new
    book, just out in Germany, tackles these matters with tenacity and
    brilliance. ``I realised I had to write it the first time I saw the
    list of authors whose books were burned,'' says Volker Weidermann, the
    journalist who has written Das Buch der Verbranntem Bucher (The Book
    of the Burning Books).

    ``I've studied German literature of that period and I read books for
    my living [Weidermann is literary editor of the Frankfurter Allgemeine
    Sonntagszeitung]. Yet of the 100-odd German names on the list, I
    hadn't heard of half of them. I thought: `Who were these authors? And
    were they so bad that, even now, they don't deserve to have their
    books read?' So I started tracking down the books and reading them.''

    That wasn't easy. Weidermann found some titles advertised on the
    internet. Some he discovered in antiquarian bookshops. Then, almost as
    he had completed his herculean quest, he came across an old man: a
    book collector living near Munich who had spent all his life and money
    collecting 15,000 first editions of these banned books. ``He's now
    over 80 and desperate for a public library to take on his collection,
    but so far none has agreed. It would be a tragedy if these books were
    lost all over again.''

    What Weidermann discovered when he opened all these banned books
    astonished him. ``There are at least four or five of these banned
    authors whose books, in my opinion, are forgotten masterpieces. People
    such as Maria Leitner, who was terrifically courageous; even when
    banned she kept returning to Germany to write reports that were
    published abroad. She disappeared in 1941. Or Armin Wegner, who wrote
    brilliant eyewitness accounts about the slaughter of the Armenians in
    Turkey. In 1933 he actually wrote an open letter to Hitler, explaining
    why the Jews were important for Germany. It was an amazingly brave
    thing to do. It took just a week or two after that before they found
    him, imprisoned him and tortured him.''

    Weidermann concedes that there are also badly written books among
    those consigned to the flames. ``But as Joseph Roth wrote: `I hold all
    the writers whose books were burned in high esteem because the fire
    has purified them and ennobled them.' And for any book by the banned
    131 authors to have survived the Nazi bonfire is a little triumph:
    evidence that someone, somewhere, was resisting tyranny.''

    But how did the book burning come about? It's easy to generalise that
    the Nazis banned literature, music and art by people they hated. But
    these were the first months of the new regime. The Nazis were far from
    confident, despite the pro-Hitler euphoria, about how quickly they
    could impose anti-Semitic policies. Only a month earlier a boycott of
    Jewish shops organised by the regime had failed embarrassingly. That
    didn't lessen the resolve of Hitler and his henchmen to persecute the
    Jews. But it did make them wary of identifying themselves with any
    more anti-Semitic demonstrations that might fall flat.

    Instead it was university students who played the leading role in
    getting the books burned. That may seem incredible to us today.
    Students are supposed to be free-thinking rebels, not rabble-rousers
    for the far Right. But as Weidermann points out: ``To support the
    Nazis in the early 1930s was an act of rebellion. You were rebelling
    against all the confusion of the Weimar Republic, against the
    humiliating Treaty of Versailles and in favour of a strong, united,
    nationalist Germany.''

    In April 1933, the Nazi Students' League called for the ``public
    burning of subversive Jewish writings by university students in
    response to the shameless anti-German smear campaign conducted by
    international Jewry''. These bonfires, in university cities throughout
    Germany, were to include material seized from university and public
    libraries, as well as bookshops and private
    collections. Astonishingly, there was virtually no opposition from
    booksellers or university professors. Far from defending free
    expression, many academics seemed as enthusiastic about the book
    burning as their students. Cologne University announced that ``the
    Senate and rector have decided to attend the occasion. Dress: dark
    suit.''

    But who would draw up this first list of banned books? After all, it
    wasn't just a matter of including Jewish authors (who comprised only
    40per cent of the list). The Nazis were also keen to suppress the
    pacifists and communists who had dominated the Berlin avant-garde cafe
    scene in the '20s. The task demanded someone who had read a lot, who
    knew the literary scene, yet was firmly fascist. In short, it needed a
    Nazi librarian. Step forward, Wolfgang Herrmann.

    The ambitious, 25-year-old Herrmann was already giving lectures on
    ``Nazi librarianship'' back in 1929, when he was still handing out
    fines for overdue books in Breslau Municipal Library. By 1932 he was
    drawing up lists of ``good books'' for German libraries. Now came the
    other side of the coin: the chance to name and shame ``bad books'' as
    well. Responding to a request by the militant students, he quickly
    wrote down the titles of books by 131 undesirable authors.

    His choice was extraordinary. Several American authors, including
    Ernest Hemingway, were on the list. So, even more inexplicably, were
    three or four pro-Nazi German authors. ``Clearly Herrmann used his big
    moment to bring down some people in the literary world that he simply
    didn't like,'' Weidermann says.

    But Herrmann himself was soon brought down. A year or two earlier he
    had written the true but incautious observation that Hitler's Mein
    Kampf contained ``no intellectually original and theoretically
    well-developed ideas''. A couple of weeks after the book burning, this
    rashview came back to haunt him. This was atime of vicious infighting
    in the Nazis' ranks. Herrmann belonged to one faction. A rival group
    was furious to have fallen behind in the race to purify German
    culture, so it set about purging thepurgers. Herrmann's review of Mein
    Kampf was dredged up. His career never recovered. Foryears he battled
    to prove his loyalty to the fuhrer, without much success. When war
    came he joined the German Army and was killed in 1945.

    Meanwhile, what were the repercussions of May 10 for the Nazi
    leadership and the persecuted writers? The former was horribly
    emboldened. As Goebbels frankly admitted in his speech at the Berlin
    bonfire, the party hierarchy was astonished that ``so swift and
    radical a clearance could be carried out in Germany''.

    They were right to be astonished. Without any coercion, the German
    public had watched with apparent delight as the books of superstar
    authors went up in smoke. Anti-Semitism clearly converged with
    anti-intellectualism that night. The Nazi leaders gleefully took
    note. Within a year, similar purges were being instigated in concert
    life, opera houses, theatres and art galleries.

    There was utter disbelief, too, among the writers whose books were
    burned. But this was disbelief mingled with dismay, fear or plain
    bewilderment. ``My books are burning at the stake in front of the
    university where I used to address thousands of people!'' wrote Stefan
    Zweig to his friend Romain Rolland. ``And not a single German writer
    is protesting at this auto-da-fe. Not even in private letters.''

    ``Some writers were far-sighted enough to sense what would happen in
    Germany, right up to the war and the Holocaust,'' Weidermann says.
    ``Others had no conception of what was going on or its repercussions.
    Some authors immediately emigrated, but many didn't. That wasn't
    necessarily because they approved of the regime. Many felt, as Armin
    Wegner said, that `emigrating is like dying'.''

    One way or another, however, an entire generation of German authors
    was silenced, many permanently, on May 10, 1933. ``Just 20 per cent of
    the 131 writers whose works were burned that night survived the next
    12 years of Hitler's regime,'' Weidermann says. ``Many killed
    themselves, often in exile. Some, like Maria Leitner, probably starved
    to death. With others, we just don't know. Those were years in which
    people simply disappeared.''

    For those who did survive until 1945, there was one last, bitter pill
    to swallow. ``Many of the famous authors returning to Germany after
    the war were devastated to find that there was no audience for them,''
    Weidermann says. ``The public that had burned their books in 1933
    still didn't want them! That was utterly humiliating for someone like
    Thomas Mann, who thought that there was a `better Germany' that would
    welcome him back.''

    By then, of course, a new tyranny was rising in the east, new in
    political complexion but horribly similar in its attitude to literary
    freedom.

    ``During my research I found a list in an antiquarian bookshop of the
    thousands of books banned by the East German authorities in the '50s
    and '60s,'' Weidermann says. ``Many of the authors were the same ones
    that had books burned by the Nazis.''

    The faces of the persecutors had changed but the persecution went on.

    Das Buch der Verbrannten Bucher is published by Kiepenheuer & Witsch,
    Cologne.
Working...
X