Tweet
A DEAL, ARF IS SURE
Lragir.am
19/11/09
According to the representative of the ARF Bureau on Hay Dat and
Political issues Kiro Manoyan, Levon Ter-Petrosyan's speech was full
of contradictions. One of them is that on the one hand he demands
the president's resignation and on the other hand he proposes a deal
bringing the example of the Catholicos. The comments of the members
of the Congress in this connection are also contradictory.
The aim of Levon Ter-Petrosyan's speech was to propose a deal to the
president. The government gives possibility to the HAK to become
a political force and in exchange, the HAK gives up demanding the
president's resignation, thinks Kiro Manoyan.
According to him, the HAK has the problem to stay alive by the next
election because precedents in different countries showed that colorful
revolutions that the first president wanted to hold are possible only
during elections.
It is not surprising that Levon Ter-Petrosyan criticized the claiming.
He has never understood its essence and has never wanted to. This
criticism is in reality aimed at the ARF because the HAK lost the
oppositional monopoly because of the ARF. Dissatisfied with this,
it tries to harm the Dashnaktsutyun, the ARF member is sure.
Lragir.am
19/11/09
According to the representative of the ARF Bureau on Hay Dat and
Political issues Kiro Manoyan, Levon Ter-Petrosyan's speech was full
of contradictions. One of them is that on the one hand he demands
the president's resignation and on the other hand he proposes a deal
bringing the example of the Catholicos. The comments of the members
of the Congress in this connection are also contradictory.
The aim of Levon Ter-Petrosyan's speech was to propose a deal to the
president. The government gives possibility to the HAK to become
a political force and in exchange, the HAK gives up demanding the
president's resignation, thinks Kiro Manoyan.
According to him, the HAK has the problem to stay alive by the next
election because precedents in different countries showed that colorful
revolutions that the first president wanted to hold are possible only
during elections.
It is not surprising that Levon Ter-Petrosyan criticized the claiming.
He has never understood its essence and has never wanted to. This
criticism is in reality aimed at the ARF because the HAK lost the
oppositional monopoly because of the ARF. Dissatisfied with this,
it tries to harm the Dashnaktsutyun, the ARF member is sure.