Tweet
PROTOCOLS SERVE INTERESTS OF ARMENIA? PROVE IT, SAYS SAFARYAN
Tert.am
06.10.09
"The protest actions are not emotional, people read and understand
very well. Prove that the Protocols serve interests of Armenia,"
Heritage Party parliamentary faction leader Stepan Safaryan said at
a press conference today. He had come to debate with Republican Party
of Armenia MP Karen Avagyan.
According to Avagyan, part of the Diaspora is for and the other part
is against the Protocols. And many of the protest actions taking place
outside Armenia are not sincere, since people are not even familiar
with the contents of the Protocols and they are only protesting based
on information presented to them.
Safaryan opposed Avagyan's idea and is convinced that, especially
when speaking about those who have received a "western education,"
to say that they don't understand the essence of the documents is
simply incorrect and offensive. Safaryan is convinced that the Armenian
president is faced with serious opposition outside the country.
Avagyan was annoyed that all political structures are for the
establishment of Armenian-Turkish relations and opening of the border,
but no one says how it should be implemented. "How else should it be,
that improvement?" Avagyan asked, posing a rhetoric question.
Tert.am
06.10.09
"The protest actions are not emotional, people read and understand
very well. Prove that the Protocols serve interests of Armenia,"
Heritage Party parliamentary faction leader Stepan Safaryan said at
a press conference today. He had come to debate with Republican Party
of Armenia MP Karen Avagyan.
According to Avagyan, part of the Diaspora is for and the other part
is against the Protocols. And many of the protest actions taking place
outside Armenia are not sincere, since people are not even familiar
with the contents of the Protocols and they are only protesting based
on information presented to them.
Safaryan opposed Avagyan's idea and is convinced that, especially
when speaking about those who have received a "western education,"
to say that they don't understand the essence of the documents is
simply incorrect and offensive. Safaryan is convinced that the Armenian
president is faced with serious opposition outside the country.
Avagyan was annoyed that all political structures are for the
establishment of Armenian-Turkish relations and opening of the border,
but no one says how it should be implemented. "How else should it be,
that improvement?" Avagyan asked, posing a rhetoric question.