Tweet
WHEN INDIFFERENT ABOUT THE DANGER
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments-lraho s15438.html
12:10:04 - 07/10/2009
There is almost no doubt that in Armenia, a public activation
preventing the signature of the Armenian and Turkish protocols, which
contain possible danger for Armenia, will not be found. The lack of
this wave enhances the danger because both Turkey and the international
society witnessed that the Armenian society is completely incompetent
in responding any danger posed to its country and is indifferent
about it. In other words, the Armenian society maybe forced almost
everything. And this thinking, the ground of which both Turkey and
the international public got, is more dangerous that the Armenian
and Turkish protocols themselves.
But is the Armenian society to be blamed? Of course not. The society
has to be organized, educated; a system of values has to be formed
for it for the latter to have stable ideas on public processes,
for each member of the public to understand that there is no refuge
of the public policy which will not influence their lives regardless
direct, quick or slow influence. The society has never been explained
its direct connection with the state and public policy. The political
forces are responsible for it. The Armenian-Turkish protocols, once
again showed the complete bankruptcy and lifelessness of the Armenian
political system the consequence of which is the public's indifference
towards such an important issue.
An ordinary citizen cannot understand which their harm will be if
for example the process on the international recognition of genocide
stops, if Armenia recognizes the present border with Turkey, or if
historians discuss historical archives etc. etc. This damage is not
being explained to the members of the society, the member does not
realize how they will be in harm if the country is in harm. The members
of the society do not absolutely understand their connection with
the state, perhaps understating subconsciously that this explanation
may give way to a question on public control in the future: no one
knows what will happen. Moreover, the Armenian political forces,
almost without exceptions, are not able to understand the connection
between the society and the state and probably do not even imagine
their connection with it.
These political forces do not imagine their mission in the life
of the state. Not the political forces, but a concrete party, say,
the X party, what role it has in the life of the state. The lack of
this system of imaginations brings about the current situation when
the country is completely incompetent towards the problems it has in
home life and external world.
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments-lraho s15438.html
12:10:04 - 07/10/2009
There is almost no doubt that in Armenia, a public activation
preventing the signature of the Armenian and Turkish protocols, which
contain possible danger for Armenia, will not be found. The lack of
this wave enhances the danger because both Turkey and the international
society witnessed that the Armenian society is completely incompetent
in responding any danger posed to its country and is indifferent
about it. In other words, the Armenian society maybe forced almost
everything. And this thinking, the ground of which both Turkey and
the international public got, is more dangerous that the Armenian
and Turkish protocols themselves.
But is the Armenian society to be blamed? Of course not. The society
has to be organized, educated; a system of values has to be formed
for it for the latter to have stable ideas on public processes,
for each member of the public to understand that there is no refuge
of the public policy which will not influence their lives regardless
direct, quick or slow influence. The society has never been explained
its direct connection with the state and public policy. The political
forces are responsible for it. The Armenian-Turkish protocols, once
again showed the complete bankruptcy and lifelessness of the Armenian
political system the consequence of which is the public's indifference
towards such an important issue.
An ordinary citizen cannot understand which their harm will be if
for example the process on the international recognition of genocide
stops, if Armenia recognizes the present border with Turkey, or if
historians discuss historical archives etc. etc. This damage is not
being explained to the members of the society, the member does not
realize how they will be in harm if the country is in harm. The members
of the society do not absolutely understand their connection with
the state, perhaps understating subconsciously that this explanation
may give way to a question on public control in the future: no one
knows what will happen. Moreover, the Armenian political forces,
almost without exceptions, are not able to understand the connection
between the society and the state and probably do not even imagine
their connection with it.
These political forces do not imagine their mission in the life
of the state. Not the political forces, but a concrete party, say,
the X party, what role it has in the life of the state. The lack of
this system of imaginations brings about the current situation when
the country is completely incompetent towards the problems it has in
home life and external world.